Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T01:57:56.424Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Field cage trials with thiotepa-sterilised males of the potato moth, Phthorimaea operculella (Zeller) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

M. N. Nabi
M. N. Nabi
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Lincoln University College of Agriculture, Canterbury, New Zealand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Males of Phthorimaea operculella (Zell.) less than 24 h old were sterilised with thiotepa by circulatory fumigation in the laboratory and then released in cages in a potato field in New Zealand. Laboratory-reared sterile males, normal males and females were released in different ratios. Sterile males competed successfully in mating to suppress reproduction between laboratory-reared normal males and females. Laboratory-reared sterile males were also released in different numbers into field cages containing the resident population and additional field-collected males and females. The results showed that the sterile males were slightly less competitive than normal ones, but they were effective in suppressing the population in the cages.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 73 , Issue 3 , September 1983 , pp. 405 - 409
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Borkovec, A. B. (1966). Insect chemosterilants. — 143 pp. New York, J. Wiley & Sons (Advances in Pest Control Research, Volume VII).Google ScholarPubMed
Campion, D. G. (1972). Insect chemosterilants: a review. — Bull ent Res. 61, 577–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CIE (COMMONWEALTH INSTITUTE OF ENTOMOLOGY) (1968). Phthorimaea operculella (Zell.).—Distrib. Maps Insect Pests (A) no. 10 (revised). London, Commonw. Agric Bur.Google Scholar
Finney, G. L., Flanders, S. E., Smith, H. S. (1947). Mass culture of Macrocentrus ancylivorus and its host, the potato tuber moth. — Hilgardia. 17, 437–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flint, H. M., Borkovec, A. B. & Palmer, D. L. (1974). Fumigation: a new method of chemosterilising the pink bollworm. — Environ. Entomol. 3, 172–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harwalkar, M. R., Khaire, S. N. & Rahalkar, G. W. (1971). Chemosterilization of potato tuberworm. 1. Effect of metepa on the fertility of males. — J. econ Ent.. 64, 358–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meifert, D. W., LaBrecque, G. C., Smith, C. N. & Morgan, P. B. (1967). Control of house flies on some West Indies islands with metepa, apholate, and trichlorfon baits. — J. econ Ent.. 60, 480–485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nabi, M. N. (1978). Some aspects of the reproductive biology and chemosterilisation of the potato moth, Phthorimaea operculella (Zeller) (Gelechiidae: Lepidoptera). — 346 pp. Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. Canterbury, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Rahalkar, G. W., Harwalkar, M. R. & Khaire, S. N. (1971). Chemosterilization of potato tuberworm moth, Phthorimaea operculella (Zeller). II. Factors modifying the sterilizing effect of metepa.—pp. 135–140. in Application of induced sterility for control of lepidopterous populations. Proceedings of a panel …: organized by the Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Atomic Energy in Food and Agriculture and held in Vienna. 1–5 June 1970. — 169 pp. Vienna, Int. Atom. Energy Ag.Google Scholar
Sharma, V. P., Patterson, R. S., Grover, K. K. & Labrecque, G. C. (1973). Chemosterilization of the tropical house mosquito Culex pipiens fatigans Wied.: laboratory and field cage studies. — Bull. Wld Hlth Org. 48, 45–48.Google ScholarPubMed
Wearne, G. R. (1969). The use of heat for the recovery of potato tuber moth larvae fromfoliage. — J Aust entomol Soc. 8, 212–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weidhaas, D. E. (1968). Field development and evaluation of chemosterilants. —pp. 275–314 in LaBrecque, G. C. & Smith, C. N. (Eds.). Principles of insect chemosterilization. — 354pp. Amsterdam, North-Holland Publ. Co.Google Scholar