Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:55:01.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Female sex pheromone release and the timing of male flight in the red bollworm Diparopsis castanea Hmps. (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae), measured by pheromone traps

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

R. J. Marks
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Makoka Research Station, Private Bag 3, Thondwe, Malawi

Abstract

The female sex pheromone gland of Diparopsis castanea Hmps. consists of modified intersegmental tissue between the eighth and ninth abdominal segments. Glands contain an average of 12·73 ×10–3 μg of pheromone consisting of 80·4±2·0% trans-9, 11-dodecadien-l-yl acetate (range 72·7–86·7%) and 19·6±2·0% 11-dodecen-l-yl acetate (range 13·3–27·3%). Although no significant correlation exists between female body weight and pheromone content of the gland, the duration of sex pheromone release over the lifespan of a female is positively correlated with its weight on emergence. Six behavioural steps may be recognised in the precopulatory behaviour of females but the frequency and duration of sex pheromone release is strongly influenced by both temperature and light intensity. At 25°C females typically ‘call’ on two or more occasions for 41–50% of the night, calling commencing earlier at cool (13·4°C) temperatures than at moderate (19·4°C) or warm (25·0°C) temperatures. Calling by mated females increases considerably from four to five nights after mating but is typically of shorter duration than for virgins. The dispersal flight of Diparopsis males in cotton crops commences almost immediately after sunset and before the end of dusk, with peak male catches in sex pheromone traps occurring earlier in the cooler months of May and June (20.00–22.00 h) than in November (02.00–04.00 h). The Diparopsis synthetic sex pheromone, dicastalure, traps a greater proportion of males and females both earlier and later in the night than virgin females and this ‘timing advantage’ may be important in a pheromone control programme based on disruption of communication between the sexes.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnes, M. M., Peterson, D. M. & O'Connor, J. J. (1966). Sex pheromone gland in female codling moth, Carpocapsa pomonella (Lepidoptera, Olethreutidae).—Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 59, 732734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartell, R. J. & Shorey, H. H. (1969). A quantitative bioassay for the sex pheromone of Epiphyas postvittana (Lepidoptera) and factors limiting male responsiveness.—J. Insect Physiol. 15, 3340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beevor, P. S., Campion, D. G., Moorhouse, J. E. & Nesbitt, B. F. (1973). Cross-attractancy and cross-mating between the red bollworm Diparopsis castanea Hmps. and the Sudan bollworm Diparopsis watersi (Roths.) (Lep., Noctuidae).—Bull. ent. Res. 62, 439442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campion, D. G., Bettany, B. W. & Steedman, R. A.The arrival of male moths of the cotton leaf-worm Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) at a new continuously recording pheromone trap.—Bull. ent. Res. 64, 379386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fatzinger, C. W. (1972). Bioassay, morphology, and histology of the female sex pheromone gland of Dioryctria abietella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae (Phycitinae)).—Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 65, 12081214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finney, D. J. (1964). Probit analysis. 388 pp. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Götz, B. (1951). Die Sexualduftstoffe an Lepidopteren.—Experientia, 7, 406418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammad, S. M. & Jarczyk, H. J. (1958). Contributions to the biology and biochemistry of the cotton leaf-worm, Prodenia litura F. III. The morphology and histology of the sexual scent glands in the female moth of Prodenia litura F.—Bull. Soc. ent. Égypte, 42, 253261.Google Scholar
Jefferson, R. N., Shorey, H. H. & Gaston, L. K. (1966). Sex pheromones of noctuid moths. X. The morphology and histology of the female sex pheromone gland of Trichoplusia ni (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae).—Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 59, 11661169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, R. N., Shorey, H. H. & Rubin, R. E. (1968). Sex pheromones of noctuid moths. XVI. The morphology of the female sex pheromone glands of eight species.—Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 61, 861865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaae., R. S. & Shorey, H. H. (1972). Sex pheromones of noctuid moths. XXVII. Influence of wind velocity on sex pheromone releasing behavior of Trichoplusia ni females.—Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 65, 436440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macfarlane, J. H. & Earle, N. W. (1970). Morphology and histology of the female sex pheromone gland of the salt-marsh caterpillar, Estigmene acrea.—Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 63, 13271332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, R. J. (1976 a). Mating behaviour and fecundity of the red bollworm Diparopsis castanea Hmps. (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae).—Bull. ent. Res. 66, 145158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, R. J. (1976 b). Field studies with the synthetic sex pheromone and inhibitor of the red bollworm Diparopsis castanea Hmps. (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) in Malawi.—Bull. ent. Res. 66, 243265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moorhouse, J. E., Yeadon, R., Beevor, P. S. & Nesbitt, B. E. (1969). Method for use in studies of insect chemical communication.—Nature, Lond. 223, 11741175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nesbitt, B. F., Beevor, P. S., Cole, R.A., Lester, R. & Poppi, R. G. (1973 a). Sex pheromones of two noctuid moths.—Nature New Biol. 244, 208209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nesbitt, B. F., Beevor, P. S., Cole, R. A., Lester, R. & Poppi, R. G. (1973 b). Synthesis of both geometric isomers of the major sex pheromone of the red bollworm moth.—Tetrahedron Lett. no. 47, 46694670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nesbitt, B. F., Beevor, P. S., Cole, R.A., Lester, R. & Poppi, R. G. (1975). The isolation and identification of the female sex pheromones of the red bollworm moth, Diparopsis castanea.—J. Insect Physiol. 12, 10911096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohbayashi, N., Yushima, T., Noguchi, H. & Tamaki, Y. (1973). Timing of mating and sex pheromone production and release of Spodoptera litura (F.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae).—Kontyû, 41, 389395.Google Scholar
Rose, D. W. (1957).—Annual Rep., Gatooma Research Station, Rhodesia, 1957.Google Scholar
Shorey, H. H. (1966). The biology of Trichoplusia ni (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). IV. Environmental control of mating.—Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 59, 502506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sower, L. L., Shorey, H. H. & Gaston, L. K. (1970). Sex pheromones of noctuid moths. XXI. Light: dark cycle regulation and light inhibition of sex pheromone release by females of Trichoplusia ni.—Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 63, 10901092.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sower, L. L., Shorey, H. H. & Gaston, L. K. (1971). Sex pheromones of noctuid moths. XXV. Effects of temperature and photoperiod on circadian rhythms of sex pheromone release by females of Trichoplusia ni.—Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 64, 488492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorpe, W. H. (1956). Learning and instinct in animals.—493 pp. London, Methuen.Google Scholar
Williams, E. V. (1959). Regression analysis.—214 pp. New York, Wiley.Google Scholar