Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:36:34.568Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Feeding behaviour and host preferences of British mosquitoes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

M. W. Service
M. W. Service
Affiliation:
The Nature Conservancy, Monks Wood Experimental Station, Abbots Ripton, Huntingdon, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The arrival of mosquitoes at human bait under natural conditions could be divided into three behavioural phases, the exploratory, the penetration and feeding periods. The duration of these periods was recorded in Mansonia richiardii (Fie), Anopheles plumbeus Steph., Aedes punctor (Kby.), Ae. detritus (Hal.), Ae. cinereus Mg. and Ae. cantans (Mg.). Adults of M. richiardii took the longest (about 4 min) and those of Ae. cinereus the shortest (about 2 min) time to obtain a blood-meal. Penetration by the mosquitoes' mouthparts was felt in about 17% of the feeds, and irritation was caused by about 18% of the mosquitoes during feeding. The natural host preferences of these, and 11 other species, were determined by precipitin tests on blood engorged mosquitoes. Adults of Culex pipiens L., C. torrentium Mart, Culiseta morsitans (Theo.) and C. litorea (Shute) were essentially avian feeders; three adults of the latter two species had also fed on unidentified reptiles. Most adults of the other species had fed mainly on mammals. There were few multiple feeds. Although the ability of a mosquito to take a blood-meal quickly from a host was recognised as important, other phenomena such as uninterrupted feeding, simultaneous feeding by large numbers of mosquitoes and host desensitisation to bites were also considered important in contributing to the success or failure of a mosquito in obtaining a blood-meal.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 60 , Issue 4 , June 1971 , pp. 653 - 661
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bang, F. B. & Reeves, W. C. (1942). Mosquitoes and encephalitis in Yakima Valley, Washington. III. Feeding habits of Culex tarsalis Coq., a mosquito host of the viruses of western equine and St. Louis encephalitis. —/. infect. Dis. 70, 273–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbet, P. S. & Downe, A. E. R. (1966). Natural hosts of mosquitoes in Northern Ellesmere Island. —Arctic 19, 153–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danielova, V. (1962). Afinita komaru k ñekteryin ptakum a savcum v jihomorasvkem lužni'm lese. —Cslkd Parasit. 9, 143–152.Google Scholar
Downe, A. E. R. (1960). Blood-meal sources and notes on host preferences of some Aedes mosquitoes (Diptera; Culicidae). —Can. J. Zool. 38, 689–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downe, A. E. R. (1962). Some aspects of host selection by Mansonia perturbans (Walk.) (Diptera: Culicidae). —Can. J. Zool. 40, 725–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downe, A. E. R. & West, A. S. (1954). Progress in the use of the precipitin test in entomological studies. —Can. Ent. 86, 181–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
East African Virus Research Institute (1969). Report, 1968, no. 18, 114 pp.Google Scholar
Edman, J. D. & Downe, A. E. R. (1964). Host-blood sources and multiple-feeding habits of mosquitoes in Kansas. —Mosquito News 24, 154–160.Google Scholar
Gillett, J. D. (1967). Natural selection and feeding speed in a blood-sucking insect. —Proc. R. Soc. B 167, 316–329.Google Scholar
Gordon, R. M. & Crewe, W. (1948). The mechanisms by which mosquitoes and tsetse-flies obtain their blood-meal, the histology of the lesions produced, and the subsequent reactions of the mammalian host; together with some observations on the feeding of Chrysops and Cimex. —Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 42, 334–356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gordon, R. M. & Lumsden, W. H. R. (1939). A study of the behaviour of the mouth-parts of mosquitoes when taking up blood from living tissue together with some observations on the ingestion of microfilariae. —Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 33, 259–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, R. B. & Gordon, R. M. (1952). An apparatus which enables the process of feeding by mosquitoes to be observed in the tissues of a live rodent; together with an account of the ejection of saliva and its significance in malaria. —Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 46, 311–319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harold, C. H. H. (1926). Studies in mosquito bionomics. —//. R. Army med. Corps 47, 81–94.Google Scholar
Mckiel, J. A. (1959). Sensitization to mosquito bites. —Can. J. Zool. 37, 341–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mckiel, J. A. & West, A. S. (1961). Nature and causation of insect bite reactions. —Pediat. Clins. N. Am. 8, 795–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellanby, K. (1946). Man's reaction to mosquito bites. —Nature, Lond. 158, 554.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Minar, J. (1969). Natural focus of the Tahyfia virus in south Moravia. Ecological investigations of mosquitoes. In Arboviruses of the California complex and Bunyamwera group. —Proc. Sym. Arboviruses, Smolenice (1966), 139–145.Google Scholar
Monchadskii, A. S. (1956). Mosquito attacks directed at man in the seaside part of the Volga delta. —Parazitol. sb. 16, 89–144.Google Scholar
Muirftead-Thomson, R. C. (1956 a). The part played by woodland mosquitoes of the genus Aedes in the transmission of myxomatosis in England. —/. Hyg., Camb. 54, 461–471.Google Scholar
Muirhead-Thomson, R. C. (1956 b). Field studies of the role of Anopheles atroparvus in the transmission of myxomatosis in England. —J. Hyg., Camb. 54, 472–477.Google ScholarPubMed
O'rourke, F. J. (1956). Observations on pool and capillary feeding in Aedes aegypti (L.). —Nature, Lond. 177, 1087–1088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rempel, J. G., Riddeix, W. A. & Mcnelly, E. M. (1946). Multiple feeding habits of Saskatchewan mosquitoes. —Can. J. Res. E. 24, 71–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riddeix, W. A., Rempel, J. G. & Mcnelly, E. M. (1947). The specificity of the precipitin reaction as used in the study of mosquito feeding habits. —Can. J. Res. E 25, 210–215.Google Scholar
Roy, D. N. (1936). On the role of blood in ovulation in Aedes aegvpti Linn. —Bull. ent. Res. 27, 423–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Service, M. W. (1968). Observations on feeding and oviposition in some British mosquitoes. —Entomologia exp. appl. 11, 277–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Service, M. W. (1969). Observations on the ecology of some British mosquitoes. —Bull. ent. Res. 59, 161–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Service, M. W. (1971). A reappraisal of the role of mosquitoes in the transmission of myxomatosis in Britain. —J. Hyg., Camb. 69, 105–111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shemanchuk, J. A., Downe, A. E. R. & Burgess, L. (1963). Hosts of mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) from the irrigated areas of Alberta. —Mosquito News 23, 336–341.Google Scholar