Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:58:17.042Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factors affecting parasitism by Microctonus aethiopoides (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) and parasitoid development in natural and novel host species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

B.I.P. Barratt  and
P.D. Johnstone
B.I.P. Barratt*
Affiliation:
AgResearch, Invermay Agricultural Centre, Private Bag 50034, Mosgiel, New Zealand
P.D. Johnstone
Affiliation:
AgResearch, Invermay Agricultural Centre, Private Bag 50034, Mosgiel, New Zealand
*
*Fax: +64 3 489 3739 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A laboratory study of aspects of parasitoid host acceptance, suitability and physiological regulation in natural and novel host species was carried out to investigate the degree of variability encountered with different hosts and to determine the value of such observations in host range determination. The parasitoid Microctonus aethiopoides Loan was exposed to a natural host, Sitona discoideus Gyllenhal (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and three novel hosts, the New Zealand native Nicaeana cervinaBroun, the introduced weed biological control agent Rhinocyllus conicus (Froehlich), and a congeneric pest species, Sitona lepidus Gyllenhal (all Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Per cent parasitism of these species was 54%, 43%, 39% and 0%, respectively. The results indicated that for both S. discoideus and R. conicus more males than females were parasitized (69% cf. 45%, and 49% cf. 32% respectively) but host size was not a significant factor. Overall, superparasitism was recorded in about 29% of parasitized weevils and there was evidence that host discrimination to avoid superparasitism occurred in the natural host. Conversely, superparasitism occurred more frequently than would be expected in N. cervina (42%) coupled with higher survival of larvae in superparasitized hosts in this species. The frequency distribution of attack of R. conicus by M. aethiopoides was not different from random. Parasitoid development was more rapid in the natural host, S. discoideus, and parasitoid size was positively correlated with host size. There was a strong positive relationship between parasitoid larval survival and the presence of teratocytes in all hosts. Host fecundity and fertility were reduced by parasitism for most species, and in some cases, by exposure to parasitoids in the absence of detectable parasitism. It was concluded that laboratory observations can provide useful information on the compatibility between host and parasitoid which can complement traditional host range tests to predict field host range.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 91 , Issue 4 , August 2001 , pp. 245 - 253
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aeschlimann, J.P. (1983) Sources of importation, establishment and spread in Australia of Microctonus aethiopoides Loan (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), a parasitoid of Sitona discoideus Gyllenhal (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Journal of the Australian Entomological Society 22, 325–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alonso-Zarazaga, M.A. & Lyal, C.H.C. (1999) A world catalogue of families and genera of Curculionoidea (Insecta: Coleoptera). 315 pp. Barcelona, Entomopraxis.Google Scholar
Barratt, B.I.P. & Sutherland, M. (2001) Development of teratocytes associated with Microctonus aethiopoides Loan (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in natural and novel host species. Journal of Insect Physiology 47, 257–262..CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barratt, B.I.P., Barker, G.M. & Addison, P.J. (1996) Sitona lepidus Gyllenhal (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), a potential clover pest new to New Zealand. New Zealand Entomologist 19, 23–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barratt, B.I.P., Evans, A.A. & Johnstone, P.D. (1996) Effect of the ratios of Listronotus bonariensis and Sitona discoideus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) to their respective parasitoids Microctonus hyperodae and Microctonus aethiopoides (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), on parasitism, host oviposition and feeding in the laboratory. Bulletin of Entomological Research 86, 101–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barratt, B.I.P., Evans, A.A. & Ferguson, C.M. (1997a) Potential for control of Sitona lepidus Gyllenhal by Microctonus spp. pp. 37–40 in O'Callaghan, M.R. (Ed.) Proceedings of the 50th New Zealand Plant Protection Conference,Lincoln University,New Zealand Plant Protection Society Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barratt, B.I.P., Evans, A.A., Ferguson, C.M., Barker, G.M., McNeill, M.R. & Phillips, C.B. (1997b) Laboratory nontarget host range of the introduced parasitoids Microctonus aethiopoides and Microctonus hyperodae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) compared with field parasitism in New Zealand. Environmental Entomology 26, 694–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barratt, B.I.P., Evans, A.A., Stoltz, D.B., Vinson, S.B. & Easingwood, R. (1999) Virus-like particles in the ovaries of Microctonus aethiopoides Loan (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), a parasitoid of adult weevils (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 73, 182–188..CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barratt, B.I.P., Ferguson, C.M., McNeill, M.R. & Goldson, S.L. (1999b) Parasitoid host specificity testing to predict host range. pp. 70–83 in Withers, T.M., Barton Browne, L. & Stanley, J.N. (Eds) Host specificity testing in Australasia: towards improved assays for biological control. CRC for Tropical Pest Management, Brisbane, Australia.Google Scholar
Barratt, B.I.P., Goldson, S.L., Ferguson, C.M., Phillips, C.B. & Hannah, D.J. (1999c) Predicting the risk from biological control agent introductions: a New Zealand approach. pp. 59–75 in Follett, P.A. & Duan, J.J. (Eds) Nontarget effects of biological control introductions. Norwell, Massachusetts, Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Beckage, N.E. (1998) Parasitoids and polydnaviruses. Bioscience 48, 305–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cullen, J.M. (1997) Biological control and impacts on non-target species. pp. 195–201 in O'Callaghan, M.R. (Ed.) Proceedings of the 50th New Zealand Plant Protection Conference, Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand, New Zealand Plant Protection Society Inc.Google Scholar
Dahlman, D.L. (1990) Evaluation of teratocyte functions: an overview. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology 13, 159–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danyk, T.P. & Mackauer, M. (1993) Discrimination between self- and conspecific-parasitized hosts in the aphid parasitoid Praon pequodorum Viereck (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae). Canadian Entomologist 125, 957–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emberson, R.M. (1994) Taxonomic impediments to the development of sustainable practices in conservation and production. pp. 71–78 in Green, O.R. (Ed.) Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Conference of the Entomological Society of New Zealand, 15–18 May 1994, Auckland, Entomological Society of New Zealand.Google Scholar
Evans, A.A. (1997) Associative effects of the parasitoid Microctonus aethiopoides on target and non-target hosts. 140 pp. MSc thesis, Department of Entomology, Lincoln University, Lincoln.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C.M., Roberts, G.M., Barratt, B.I.P. & Evans, A.A. (1994) The distribution of the parasitoid Microctonus aethiopoides Loan (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in southern South Island Sitona discoideus Gyllenhal (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) populations. pp. 261–265 in O'Callaghan, M.R. (Ed.) Proceedings of the 47th New Zealand Plant Protection Conference, 9–11 August 1994 Waitangi Hotel, Pahia, New Zealand, New Zealand Plant Protection Society Inc.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C.M., Cresswell, A.S., Barratt, B.I.P. & Evans, A.A. (1998) Non-target parasitism of the weed biological control agent, Rhinocyllus conicus Froelich (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) by Microctonus aethiopoides Loan (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). pp. 517–524 in Zalucki, M., Drew, R., & White, G. (Eds) Pest management – future challenges: Proceedings of the 6th Australasian Applied Entomological Research Conference, 29 September–2 October 1998 Brisbane, The Cooperative Research Centre for Tropical Pest Management.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C.M., Barratt, B.I.P. & Cresswell, A.S. (1999) Field parasitism of the weed biological control agent Rhinocyllus conicus by the introduced braconid, Microctonus aethiopoides. p. 275 in O'Callaghan, M.R. (Ed.) Proceedings of the 52nd New Zealand Plant Protection Society Conference, Auckland, New Zealand Plant Protection Society.Google Scholar
Flanders, S.E., Teran, A.L., DeBach, P., Blumberg, D. & Luck, R.F. (1990) Differences in the rates of superparasitism between two strains of Comperiella bifasciata (Howard) (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) parasitizing California red scale (Homoptera: Diaspididae): an adaptation to circumvent encapsulation? Annals of the Entomological Society of America 83, 591–597.Google Scholar
Fusco, R.A. & Hower, A.A. (1973) Host influence on the laboratory production of the parasitoid, Microctonus aethiops (Nees). Environmental Entomology 2, 971–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldson, S.L., McNeill, M.R., Phillips, C.B. & Proffitt, J.R. (1992) Host specificity testing and suitability of the parasitoid Microctonus hyperodae (Hym.: Braconidae, Euphorinae) as a biological control agent of Listronotus bonariensis (Col.: Curculionidae) in New Zealand. Entomophaga 37, 483–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guillot, F.S., Joiner, R.L. & Vinson, S.B. (1974) Host discrimination: isolation of hydrocarbons from Dufour's gland of a braconid parasitoid. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 67, 720–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howarth, F.G. (1991) Environmental impacts of classical biological control. Annual Review of Entomology 36, 489–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jessep, C.T. (1975) Introduction of a weevil for biological control of nodding thistle. pp. 205–206 in Hartley, M.J. (Ed.) Proceedings of the 28th New Zealand Weed and Pest Control Conference28.Google Scholar
Jones, D., Jones, G., Rudnicka, M., Click, A., Reck, Malleczewen V. & Iwaya, M. (1986) Pseudoparasitism of host Trichoplusia ni by Chelonus spp. as a new model system for parasite regulation of host physiology. Journal of Insect Physiology 32, 315–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuschel, G. (1995) A phylogenetic classification of Curculionoidea to family and subfamily level. pp. 5–36 in Anderson, R.S. & Lyal, C.H.C. (Eds) Biology and phylogeny of Curculionoidea: Proceedings of the XVIII International Congress of Entomology, July 1988, Vancouver, Canada, Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Washington.Google Scholar
Loan, C.C. (1967) Studies on the taxonomy and biology of the Euphorinae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). II. Host relations of six Microctonus species. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 60, 236–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loan, C. & Holdaway, F.G. (1961) Microctonus aethiops (Nees) auctt. and Perilitis rutilis (Nees) auctt. (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), European parasites of Sitona weevils (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Canadian Entomologist 93, 1057–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackauer, M. (1990) Host discrimination and larval competition in solitary endoparasitoids. pp. 41–62 in Mackauer, M., Ehler, L.E. & Roland, J. (Eds) Critical issues in biological control. Andover, Hants, Intercept.Google Scholar
McNeill, M.R., Goldson, S.L. & Baird, D.B. (1996) Evidence of host discrimination by Microctonus hyperodae Loan (Hymenoptera: Braconidae, Euphorinae), a parasitoid of the Argentine stem weevil Listronotus bonariensis (Kuschel) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Biocontrol Science and Technology 6, 77–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeill, M.R., Barratt, B.I.P. & Evans, A.A. (2000) Behavioural acceptability of Sitona lepidus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) to the parasitoid Microctonus aethiopoides (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) using the pathogenic bacterium Serratia marcescens Bizio. Biocontrol Science and Technology 10, 205–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, H. (1963) Zur populations dynamik von Sitona Germar (Curculionidae) auf luzerne und Rotklee unter besonderen berucksichtigung entomophager parasiten. Zoologische Jahrbucher Abteilung für Systematik Okologie und Geographie der Tiere 90, 659–696.Google Scholar
Munster Swendsen, M. (1994) Pseudoparasitism: detection and ecological significance in Epinotia tedella (Cl.) (Tortricidae). pp. 329–335 in Insect parasitoids: biology and ecology. Honne Conference Center, Biri, Norway, Agricultural University of Norway.Google Scholar
Nelder, J.A. and Wedderburn, R.W.M. (1972) Generalised linear models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A 135, 370–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okuda, T., Barratt, B.I.P. & Knutelski, S. (2000) Significance of teratocytes as a source of nutrients for developing larvae of three species of euphorine parasitoids of adult hosts. in Proceedings of the XXI International Congress of Entomology,Brasil, (abstract).Google Scholar
Phillips, C.B. (1996) Intraspecific variation in Microctonus hyperodae and M. aethiopoides (Hymenoptera: Braconidae); significance for their use as biological control agents. 169 pp. PhD thesis, Department of Entomology, Lincoln University, Lincoln, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Simberloff, D. & Stiling, P. (1996a) How risky is biological control? Ecology 77, 1965–1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simberloff, D. & Stiling, P. (1996b) Risks of species introduced for biological control. Biological Conservation 78, 185–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, O.J. (1952) Biology and behaviour of Microctonus vittatae Muesebeck. University of California Berkeley Publications in Entomology 9, 315–344.Google Scholar
Stufkens, M.W., Farrell, J.A. & Goldson, S.L. (1987) Establishment of Microctonus aethiopoides, a parasitoid of the sitona weevilin New Zealand. pp. 31–32 in Popay, A.J. (Ed.) Proceedings of the 40th New Zealand Weed and Pest Control Conference.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Lenteren, J.C. (1997) Benefits and risks of introducing exotic macro-biological control agents into Europe.pp. 15–27 in Smith, I.M. (Ed.) EPPO/CABI workshopon safety and efficacy of biological control in Europe. Oxford, Blackwell Science Ltd.Google Scholar
Zwolfer, H. & Harris, P. (1971) Host specificity determination of insects for biological control of weeds. Annual Review of Entomology 16, 159–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar