Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:02:01.870Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

External sex differences in stored-products Coleoptera

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

D. G. H. Halstead
D. G. H. Halstead
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Council, Pest Infestation Laboratory, Slough, Bucks.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The known external characters, and some new ones, for separating the sexes of pupae and adults of stored-products Coleoptera are described and in many cases figured.

Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 54 , Issue 1 , May 1963 , pp. 119 - 134
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beal, R. S. (1956). Synopsis of the economic species of Trogoderma occurring in the United States with description of a new species (Coleoptera: Dermestidae).—Ann. ent. Soc. Amer. 49 pp. 559–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coombs, C. W. & Woodroffe, G. E. (1955). A revision of the British species of Cryptophagus (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Cryptophagidae).—Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 106 pp. 237–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davey, P. M. (1958). The groundnut bruchid Caryedon gonagra (F.).—Bull. ent. Res. 49 pp. 385–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobson, R. M. (1954). The species of Carpophilus Stephens (Col., Nitidulidae) associated with stored products.—Bull. ent. Res. 45 pp. 389–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, W. W. (1891). The Coleoptera of the British Islands. Vol. V.— London, Reeve.Google Scholar
Hewlett, P. S. (1958). Secondary sexual characters in Alphitobius laevigatus (F.) and A. diaperinus (Panz.) (Col., Tenebrionidae).—Ent. mon. Mag. 94 p. 144.Google Scholar
Hinton, H. E. (1941). The Ptinidae of economic importance.—Bull. ent. Res. 31 pp. 331–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinton, H. E. (1942). Secondary sexual characters of Tribolium.—Nature, Lond. 149 pp. 500–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinton, H. E. (1945). A monograph of the beetles associated with stored products. Vol. I.—443 pp. London, Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.).Google Scholar
Hope, J. A. (1953). A simple method for sexing the confused flour beetle.— Nature, Lond. 171 pp. 265–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefkovitch, L. P. (1959). A revision of the European Laemophloeinae (Coleoptera: Cucujidae).—Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 111 pp. 95–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohamed, Taher El Sayed (1940). The morphology, anatomy and biology of Araecerus fasciculatus DeGeer (Coleoptera: Anthribidae).—Bull. Soc. Fouad ler Ent. 24 pp. 82–151.Google Scholar
Potter, C. (1935). The biology and distribution of Rhizopertha dominica (Fab.). —Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 83 pp. 449–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, P. & Ellington, G. W. (1925). The ham beetle Necrobia rufipes de Geer.—J. agric. Res. 30 pp. 845–863.Google Scholar
Southgate, B. J. (1958). Systematic notes on species of Callosobruchus of economic importance.—Bull. ent. Res. 49 pp. 591–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southgate, B. J., Howe, R. W. & Brett, G. A. (1957). The specific status of Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) and Callosobruchus analis (F.).—Bull. ent. Res. 48 pp. 79–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Surtees, G. (1961). Secondary sexual characters in adult Alphitophagus bifasciatus Say (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae).—Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (B) 30 p. 112.Google Scholar