Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:21:53.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of hempa on the gonads of Locusta Migratoria (L.) (Orthoptera, Acrididae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Vishwa Nath
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Panjab University, Chandigarh-160014, India
P. K. Mittal
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Panjab University, Chandigarh-160014, India
Chander Sheikher
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Panjab University, Chandigarh-160014, India

Abstract

Only a very strong dose of 0·5 mg of hempa caused necrosis in testes of Locusta migratoria (L.). The apical cells, spermatogonia and primary spermatocytes became pycnotic and the germ cells were disorganised. Multinucleated cells also developed, due to failure of spindle formation, and a few hypertrophied spermatids occurred. In ovaries the chromatin of the follicular epithelial cell nuclei was abnormally fragmented; nuclei of the follicular epithelial cells became pycnotic; germinal vesicle was badly damaged; cytoplasm of the follicular epithelial cells was drawn into the peripheral empty space formed by the contraction of the ooplasm; the follicular epithelium degenerated later; and yolk formation was inhibited. With increased doses and post-treatment periods necrosis became more marked. Hempa was more effective in the ovary than in the testes of L. migratoria.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bořkovec, A. B. (1966). Insect chemosterilants. In Metcalfe, R. L. (Ed.) Advances in pest control research. Volume VII.—143 pp. New York, Interscience Publishers.Google Scholar
Campion, D. G. (1972). Insect chemosterilants: a review.—Bull. ent. Res. 61, 577635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campion, D. G. & Lewis, C. T. (1971). Studies of competitiveness, chemosterilant persistence and sperm structure in treated red bollworms, Diparopsis castanea Hmps. In Sterility principle for insect control or eradication. Proceedings of a symposium on the sterility principle for insect control or eradication, jointly organised by the IAEA and FAO and held in Athens, 14–18 September 1970.—183–202. Vienna IAEA (Proceedings series STI/PUB/265).Google Scholar
Chang, S.C, Terry, P. H., Woods, C. W. & Bočkovec, A. B. (1967). Metabolism of hempa uniformly labelled with C14 in male house flies.—J. econ. Ent. 60, 16231631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, G. (1974). Genetic control of insect pests.—158 pp. New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hafez, M., Osman, M. F. & Erakey, M. A. S. (1970). Studies on control of house flies in Egypt by chemosterilants. III. Sterilization of Musca sorbens by apholate, tepa and hempa.—J. econ. Ent. 63, 11671169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooper, G. H. S. (1969). Chemosterilant studies at the University of Queensland, Australia. In IIIème Congrès International des Antiparasitaires, Milan, Italie, 68 octobre 1969. —291–294. Zurich, Centre International des Antiparasitaires.Google Scholar
Klassen, W., Norland, J. F. & Bořkovec, A. B. (1968). Potential chemosterilants for boll-weevils.—J. econ. Ent. 61, 401407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labrecque, G. C. & Smith, C. N., Eds. (1968). Principles of insect chemosterilization.—354 pp. Amsterdam, North-Holland Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Morgan, P. B. (1967). Effects of hempa on the ovarian development of the house fly, Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae).—Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 60, 812818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redfern, R. E. (1970). Evaluations of candidate chemosterilants for control of two-spotted spider mites.—J. econ. Ent. 63, 357359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J. A. & Hays, S. B. (1969). Histological changes in the gonads and reproductive behavior of house flies following treatment with chemosterilants p,p-bis (l-aziridinyl)-N-(3-methoxypropyl) phosphinothioic amide.—J. econ. Ent. 62, 690692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar