Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T02:24:02.857Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of groundnut crop density on the population dynamics of Aphis craccivora Koch (Hemiptera, Aphididae) in Malawi

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

J. A. K. Farrell
J. A. K. Farrell
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Council of Malawi, P.O. Lilongwe, Malawi
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Three plant spacings, 30 cm, 7·5 cm and 2·5 cm within rows 90 cm apart, equivalent to about 36, 143 and 430 thousand plants/ha respectively, were used in three field trials on the population dynamics of Aphis craccivora Koch on groundnuts at Chitedze, Malawi in 1964–1967. Aphid density per infested plant was consistently higher, while numbers of aphid-infested plants per unit area were consistently lower, in 30 cm than in 2·5 cm spacing. Aphid numbers per unit area increased to similar levels at all spacings in crops under 40–50 days old, but subsequently aphid density was consistently lower in 2·5 cm than in 30 cm spacing. This effect could not be related to the intensity of fungus disease infection, parasitism, predation, the availability of feeding sites or the rate of emigration. Aphid groups were, however, consistently smaller in 2·5 cm than in 30 cm spacing in one trial. The potential rate of increase was studied in two trials using the methods of Hughes (1962), and was found to be consistently lower in 2·5 cm than in 30 cm spacing. The rate of plant growth was relatively depressed in 2·5 cm spacing, particularly after 40 days. The effect of spacing on aphid numbers was attributed to the effect of host-plant condition on the potential rate of increase.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 66 , Issue 2 , June 1976 , pp. 317 - 329
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

A'Brook, J. (1964). The effect of planting date and spacing on the incidence of groundnut rosette disease and of the vector Aphis craccivora Koch, at Mokwa, Northern Nigeria.—Ann. appl. Biol. 54, 199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, A. N. (1967). The vectors and alternative hosts of groundnut rosette virus in Central Province, Malawi—Rhod. Zambia, Malawi J. agric. Res. 5, 145–151.Google Scholar
Booker, R. H. (1963). The effect of sowing date and spacing on rosette disease of groundnuts in Northern Nigeria, with observations on the vector, Aphis craccivora.—Ann. appl. Biol. 52, 125–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, J. C. (1972). Studies on the ecology of Aphis craccivora Koch (Hem., Aphididae), the vector of rosette disease of groundnuts, in Uganda.—Bull. ent. Res. 62, 169–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, A. C. (1954). Groundnut rosette disease in Tanganyika. 1. Field studies.—Ann. appl. Biol. 41, 189–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, J. A. K. (1972). The effects of cultural control measures on the spread of groundnut rosette virus disease by Aphis craccivora Koch and the effects of arthropod feeding damage on groundnut yield.—122 pp. Ph.D. thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. A. K. (1976). Effects of groundnut sowing date and plant spacing on rosette virus disease in Malawi.—Bull. ent. Res. 66, 159–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutierrez, A. P., Morgan, D. J. & Havenstein, D. E. (1971). The ecology of Aphis craccivora Koch and subterranean clover stunt virus. I. The phenology of aphid populations and the epidemiology of virus in pastures in south-east Australia.—J. appl. Ecol. 8, 699–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, R. D. (1962). A method for estimating the effects of mortality on aphid populations.—J. Anim. Ecol. 31, 389–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, R. D. (1963). Population dynamics of the cabbage aphid, Brevicoryne brassicae (L.).—J. Anim. Ecol. 32, 393–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, R. (1964). Spread of groundnut rosette virus by Aphis craccivora (Koch).—Nature, Lond. 202, 213–214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, B. (1965). Wing polymorphism in aphids. II. Interaction between aphids.—Entomologia exp. appl. 8, 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Painter, R. H. (1951). Insect resistance in crop plants.—520 pp. New York, MacMillan Co.Google Scholar
RÉal, P. (1955). Le cycle annuel du puceron de l'arachide (Aphis leguminosae Theob.) en Afrique Noire Française et son déterminisme.—Rev. Path. vég. Ent. agric. 34, 3–122.Google Scholar
Shaw, M. J. P. (1970). The effects of population density on alienicolae of Aphis fabae Scop. I. The effect of crowding on the production of alatae in the laboratory.—Ann. appl. Biol. 65, 191–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storey, H. H. (1935). Virus diseases of East African plants. III. Rosette disease of groundnuts.—E. Afr. agric. J. 1, 206–211.Google Scholar
Storey, H. H. & Bottomley, A. M. (1928). The rosette disease of peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.).—Ann. appl. Biol. 15, 26–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Way, M. J. & Banks, C. J. (1967). Intra-specific mechanisms in relation to the natural regulation of numbers of Aphis fabae Scop.—Ann. appl. Biol. 59, 189–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Way, M. J. & Heathcote, G. D. (1966). Interactions of crop density of field beans, abundance of Aphis fabae Scop., virus incidence and aphid control by chemicals.—Ann. appl. Biol. 57, 409–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, E. J. (1961). Fitting a geometric progression to frequencies.—Biometrics 17, 584–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar