Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:11:13.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of forced egg-retention on the oviposition patterns of female Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

D. D. Chadee
Affiliation:
Insect Vector Control Division, Ministry of Health, 3 Queen Street, St Joseph, Trinidad, West Indies

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Short Communication
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Apostal, B.L., Black, W.C. IV, Reiter, P. & Miller, B.R. (1994) Use of randomly amplified polymorphic DNA amplified by polymerase chain reaction markers to estimate the number of Aedes aegypti families at oviposition sites in San Juan, Puerto Rico. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 51, 8997.Google Scholar
Bos, R., Fevrier, M. & Knudsen, A.B. (1988) Saint Lucia revisited. Parasitology Today 4, 295298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chadee, D.D. (1984) An evaluation of temephos in water drums in Trinidad, W. I. Mosquito News 44, 5153.Google Scholar
Chadee, D.D. (1987) Factors influencing spatial and temporal patterns of oviposition by Aedes aegypti (L.) (Diptera: Culicidae). PhD Thesis. University of Dundee, UK.Google Scholar
Chadee, D.D. (1988) Landing periodicity of the mosquito Aedes aegypti in Trinidad in relation to the timing of insecticidal space spraying. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 2, 189192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chadee, D.D. (1993) Oviposition response of Aedes aegypti (L.) to the presence of conspecific eggs in the field in Trinidad, W.I. Journal of the Florida Mosquito Control Association 64, 6366.Google Scholar
Chadee, D.D., Corbet, P.S. & Greenwood, J.J.D. (1990) Egg-laying yellow fever mosquitoes avoid sites containing eggs laid by themselves or by conspecifics. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 57, 295298.Google Scholar
Christophers, S.R. (1960) Aedes aegypti (L.). The yellow fever mosquito, pp. 739. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clements, A.N. (1992) The biology of mosquitoes, vol. 1. Development, nutrition and reproduction. London, Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbet, P.S. & Chadee, D.D. (1993) An improved method for detecting substrate preferences shown by mosquitoes that exhibit ‘skip oviposition’. Physiological Entomology 18, 114118.Google Scholar
Else, J.G. & Judson, C.L. (1972) Enforced egg-retention and its effects on vitellogenesis in the mosquito, Aedes aegypti. Journal of Medical Entomology 9, 527530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gubler, D.J. (1989) Aedes aegypti and Aedes aegypti-borne disease control in the 1990s. Top down or bottom up. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 40, 571578.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Havertz, D.S. & Curtin, T.J. (1967) Reproductive behavior of Aedes aegypti (L.) sublethally exposed to DDT. Journal of Medical Entomology 4, 143145.Google Scholar
Judson, C.L. (1968) Physiology of feeding and oviposition behavior in Aedes aegypti (L.) Experimental dissociation of feeding and oogenesis. Journal of Medical Entomology 5, 2123.Google Scholar
Lloyd, L.S., Winch, P., Ortega-Canto, J. & Kendell, C. (1992) Results of a community-based Aedes aegypti control program in Merida, Yucatan, Mexico. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 46, 635642.Google Scholar
McDonald, J.L. (1972) Viability of mosquito eggs produced by female mosquitoes denied oviposition sites. Mosquito News 32, 463466.Google Scholar
Meola, R. & Lea, A.O. (1972) Humoral inhibition of egg development in mosquitoes. Journal of Medical Entomology 9, 99103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, C.G. & Fisher, B.R. (1969) Competition in mosquitoes. Density and species ratio effects on growth, mortality, fecundity and production of growth retardants. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 62, 13251331.Google Scholar
Mulla, M.S. (1979) Chemical ecology of mosquitoes: auto and transpecific regulating chemicals in nature. Proceeding of the California Mosquito Control Association 47, 6568.Google Scholar
PAHO (1994) Dengue and dengue hemorrhagic fever in the Americas: guidelines for prevention and control. Scientific Pub. no. 548. Pan American Health Organization, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Reiter, P., Amador, M.A., Anderson, R.A. & Clark, G.G. (1995) Dispersal of Aedes aegypti in an urban area after blood feeding as demonstrated by rubidium-marked eggs. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 52, 177179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenbaum, J., Nathan, M.B., Ragoonanansingh, R., Rawlins, S., Gayle, C., Chadee, D.D. & Lloyd, L.S. (1995) Community participation in dengue prevention and control: a survey of knowledge, attitudes, and practice in Trinidad and Tobago. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 52, 111117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabestian, A., Myint Sein, M., Myat Thu, M. & Corbet, P.S. (1990) Suppression of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) using augmentative release of dragonfly larvae (Odonata: Libellulidae) with community participation in Yangon, Myanmar. Bulletin of Entomological Research 80, 223232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokal, R.R. & Rohlf, F.J. (1980) Biometry. The principles and practice of statistics in biological research. 2nd edn, San Francisco, Freeman.Google Scholar
Trpis, M. (1972) Dry season survival of Aedes aegypti eggs in various breeding sites in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 47, 433437.Google Scholar
Woke, P.A. (1937) Deferred oviposition in Aedes aegypti (Linnaeus) (Diptera: Culicidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 48, 3946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodall, J.P. & Bertram, D.S. (1959) Transmission of Semliki Forest virus by Aedes aegypti L. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 53, 440444.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed