Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-lvwk9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-18T15:59:22.133Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of different plant foods on the fecundity, fertility and development of a cotton stainer, Dysdercus superstitiosus (F.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Q. A. Geering  and
T. H. Coaker
Q. A. Geering
Affiliation:
Empire Cotton Growing Corporation, Cotton Research Station, Namulonge, Uganda
T. H. Coaker
Affiliation:
Empire Cotton Growing Corporation, Cotton Research Station, Namulonge, Uganda
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Dysdercus superstitiosus (F.) is capable of utilising a much wider range of food-plants than was previously supposed, and is able to complete a full breeding cycle on the several diets other than cotton. This has been demonstrated by rearing and breeding adults and nymphs in the laboratory, in Uganda, on selected food material, e.g., Sorghum vulgare, Pennisetum typhoides, Zea mays and Vigna unguiculata, immature seeds of each being used. Diets other than mature cotton seeds are less suitable for breeding, as judged by fecundity of females and development of nymphs, but the influence of nymphal diet on adult fecundity is not consistent. Females reared on sorghum are smaller than those reared on cotton seed and they may lay fewer eggs.

There is an indication that varieties of sorghum may differ in their suitability for producing maximum fecundity and fertility. Those varieties to which the stainer exhibits a predisposition in the field may not be the most suitable.

When adults are fed on cotton bolls of ages 1–10 weeks, the fecundity of females, and the rate of egg-production increase with increasing age of boll, and the preoviposition period decreases.

Stored cotton seed may be less suitable for egg-production than freshly harvested seed cotton.

Extraction of oil from cotton seed with petroleum ether does not wholly impair the fecundity rate of females fed on the seed, but may reduce the fertility and nymphal survival in the first instar.

A diet of cotton seed, heat treated at 150–190°C. for one hour, reduces the fecundity in the females, possibly by destroying the accessary food factors. Nymphal survival is possible on such treated seed, but not when thus heated for two hours at or above 150°C.

Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 51 , Issue 1 , April 1960 , pp. 61 - 76
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baillie, A. F. H. (1953). Entomology.—Progr. Rep. Exp. Stas Emp. Cott. Gr. Corp. 1951–1952 N. Nigeria pp. 11–25.Google Scholar
Bebbington, A. G. & Allan, W. (1936). Northern Rhodesia. Research Station, Mazabuka. Progress report on the cotton work, season 1934–35.—Progr. Rep. Exp. Stas Emp. Cott. Gr. Corp. 1934–1935 pp. 61–67.Google Scholar
Creighton, J. T. (1938). Factors influencing insect abundance.—J. econ. Ent. 31 pp. 735–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahms, R. G., Snelling, R. O. & Fenton, F. A. (1936). Effect of several varieties of sorghum and other host plants on biology of the chinch bug.—J. econ. Ent. 29 pp. 1147–1153.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, G. & Blewett, M. (1946). Linoleic acid, vitamin E and other fatsoluble substances in the nutrition of certain insects, Ephestia kuehniella, E. elutella, E. cautella and Plodia interpunctella (Lep.).—J. exp. Biol. 22 pp. 172–190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friend, W. G. (1958). Nutritional requirements of phytophagous insects.—Annu. Rev. Ent. 3 pp. 57–74.Google Scholar
Geering, Q. A. (1953). A cotton stainer (Dysdercus superstitiosus Fabr.) as a potential pest of sorghum.—Emp. J. exp. Agric. 20 pp. 234–239.Google Scholar
Geering, Q. A. (1956). A method for controlled breeding of cotton stainers, Dysdercus spp. (Pyrrhocoridae).—Bull. ent. Res. 46 pp. 743–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haddow, A. J. (1960). Studies on the biting habits and medical importance of East African mosquitos in the genus Aëdes. I.—Bull. ent. Res. 50 pp. 759–779.Google Scholar
Harris, P. L., Quaife, M. L. & Swanson, W. J. (1950). Vitamin E content of foods.—J. Nutr. 40 pp. 367–381.Google Scholar
Hilditch, T. P. (1947). The chemical constitution of natural fats.—2nd edn., 553 pp. London, Chapman & Hall; New York, Wiley.Google Scholar
Milne, A. (1959). Biology and ecology of the garden chafer, Phyllopertha horticola (L.). VI. The flight season: reproductive state of females.—Bull. ent. Res. 50 pp. 467–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milne, A. & Laughlin, R. (1956). Biology and ecology of the garden chafer, Phyllopertha horticola (L.). I. The adult and egg production.—Bull. ent. Res. 47 pp. 7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, E. O. (1934). Preliminary observations on cotton stainers and internal boll disease of cotton in S. Africa.—Bull. ent. Res. 25 pp. 383–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, E. O. (1937). Investigations on cotton stainers and internal boll disease.—Progr. Rep. Exp. Stas Emp. Cott. Gr. Corp. 1935–36 pp. 37–42.Google Scholar
Rainey, R. C. (1948). Observations on the development of the cotton boll, with particular reference to changes in susceptibility to pests and diseases.—Ann. appl. Biol. 35 pp. 64–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raw, F. (1951). The ecology of the garden chafer, Phyllopcrtha horticola (L.) with preliminary observations on control measures.—Bull. ent. Res. 42 pp. 605–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trager, W. (1947). Insect nutrition.—Biol. Rev. 22 pp. 148–177.Google Scholar
Trouvelot, B. & Grison, P. (1935). Variations de fécondité du Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say avec les Solanum tubifères consommés par l'insecte.—C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 201 pp. 1053–1055.Google Scholar
Wigglesworth, V. B. (1950). The principles of insect physiology.—4th edn., 544 pp. London, Methuen; New York, Dutton.Google Scholar