Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:00:32.068Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of temperature and photoperiod on diapause induction in Erioischia brassicae (Bch.) (Diptera, anthomyiidae) under controlled conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

S. K. Soni
Affiliation:
National Vegetable Research Station, Wellesbourne, Warwick, CV35 9EF, England

Abstract

Experiments were carried out to determine the optimum temperatures and photoperiods for inducing diapause in the cabbage root fly, Erioischia brassicae (Bch.). The induction of diapause occurred at certain receptive stages between the first and third instars of larval development. When developing larvae were subjected to 20±1°C and a 16-h photoperiod for 7–14 days followed by 13±0·5°C and a 10-h photoperiod for 28–35 days, diapause was induced in 84–97% of the pupae; 88–99% of pupae entered diapause when developing larvae were subjected to 13±0·5°C and a 10-h photoperiod for 28–42 days followed by 20±1°C and a 16-h photoperiod for 11–18 days. Similar results were obtained when developing larvae were subjected to 13±0·5°C (day)/7±0·5°C (night) and a 6-h photoperiod. The fecundity of flies from the diapausing pupae was not adversely affected. Application of these results should enable cabbage root fly to be cultured economically for intermittent use.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Coaker, T. H. & Wright, D. W. (1963). The influence of temperature on the emergence of the cabbage root fly (Erioischia brassicae (Bouché)) from over-wintering pupae.—Ann. appl. Biol. 52, 337343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finch, S. & Coaker, T. H. (1969). A method for the continuous rearing of the cabbage root fly Erioischia brassicae (Bch.) and some observations on its biology.—Bull. ent. Res. 58, 619627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, C. R. & Svec, H. J. (1966). Mass rearing of the cabbage maggot under controlled environmental conditions, with observations on the biology of cyclodiene-susceptible and resistant strains.—J. econ. Ent. 59, 569573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, R. D. (1960). Induction of diapause in Erioischia brassicae (Bouche) (Dipt., Antho-myiidae).—J. exp. Biol. 37, 218223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansingh, A. & Smallman, B. N. (1966). Photoperiod control of an ‘obligatory’ pupal diapause.—Can. Ent. 98, 613616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mcleod, D. G. R. & Driscoll, G. R. (1967). Diapause in the cabbage maggot, Hylemya brassicae (Diptera: Anthomyiidae).—Can. Ent. 99, 890893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Missonnier, J. (1960). Contribution à l'étude du cycle biologique et de la diapause de Chortophila brassicae Bouché (Diptera: Muscidae).—C. r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris 251, 143145.Google Scholar
Missonnier, J. (1963). Etude écologique du développement nymphal de deux diptères muscides phytophages: Pegemyia betae Curtis et Chortophila brassicae BouchéAnnls Epiphyt. 14, 293310.Google Scholar
Read, D. C. (1965). Notes on factors influencing diapause in the cabbage maggot, Hylemya brassicae (Bouché).—Can. Ent. 97, 177181.Google Scholar
Read, D. C. (1969). Rearing the cabbage maggot with and without diapause.—Can. Ent. 101, 725737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zabirov, Sh. M. (1961). Conditions influencing the seasonal cycles of development of the beet fly Pegomyia hyosciami Panz. and the cabbage fly Hylemyia brassicae Bouché (Diptera, Anthomyiidae).—Ént. Obozr. 40, 275281. [In Russian]Google Scholar
Zabirov, Sh. M. (1962). On the ecology of the beet fly Pegomyia hyo.sciami Panz. and the cabbage fly Hylemyia brassicae Bouché (Diptera, Anthomyiidae).—Vest. Leningr. Univ., Ser. Biol. 17 (21), 5462. [In Russian]Google Scholar