Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T09:15:04.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of relatedness on the response of Adalia bipunctata L. to oviposition deterring cues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2012

X. Martini ,
A.F.G. Dixon  and
J.-L. Hemptinne
X. Martini*
Affiliation:
Université de Toulouse - ENFA, UMR CNRS 5174 Evolution and Diversité Biologique, BP 22687, F-31326, Castanet Tolosan Cedex, France University of Florida, Citrus Research and Education Center, Lake Alfred, FL 33850, USA
A.F.G. Dixon
Affiliation:
Institute of Systems Biology and Ecology, AS CR, Na sadkach 7, Cz-37005 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic
J.-L. Hemptinne
Affiliation:
Université de Toulouse - ENFA, UMR CNRS 5174 Evolution and Diversité Biologique, BP 22687, F-31326, Castanet Tolosan Cedex, France
*
*Author for correspondence Fax: +33 (0)561750309 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Larvae of aphidophagous ladybirds leave a cue in their tracks that deters oviposition. The influence of relatedness on this behaviour is for the first time explored in this paper. Two-spot ladybird females (Adalia bipunctata L.) under different conditions (young and naive, young and experienced, and old and naive) were exposed either to (i) clean filter paper, (ii) filter paper contaminated with unrelated larval tracks or (iii) filter paper contaminated with related larval tracks from their offspring. Oviposition time was recorded during nine hours. Oviposition was inhibited by larval tracks, and was more so by related than unrelated ones. Experienced females showed the same behaviour but with lower intensity. With old females, response was not significant with any type of larval tracks. This is the first report of the effect of relatedness on a ladybird's response to larval tracks.

Keywords

Coccinellidaerelatednesskinlarval tracksoviposition deterring pheromone
Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 103 , Issue 1 , February 2013 , pp. 14 - 19
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agarwala, B.K. & Dixon, A.F.G. (1993) Kin recognition: egg and larval cannibalism in Adalia bipunctata (Coleoptera, Coccinellidae). European Journal of Entomology 90, 45–50.Google Scholar
Agboka, K., Schulthess, F., Chabi-Olaye, A., Labo, I., Gounou, S. & Smith, H. (2002) Self-, intra-, and interspecific host discrimination in Telenomus busseolae Gahan and T-isis Polaszek (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae), sympatric egg parasitoids of the African cereal stem borer Sesamia calamistis Hampson (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Journal of Insect Behavior 15, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, A.F.G. & Agarwala, B.K. (2002) Triangular fecundity function and ageing in ladybird beetles. Ecological Entomology 27, 433–440.Google Scholar
Doumbia, M., Hemptinne, J.-L. & Dixon, A.F.G. (1998) Assessment of patch quality by ladybirds: role of larval tracks. Oecologia 113, 197–202.Google Scholar
Faraji, F., Janssen, A., Van Rijn, P.C.J. & Sabelis, M.W. (2000) Kin recognition by the predatory mite Iphiseius degenerans: discrimination among own, conspecific, and heterospecific eggs. Ecological Entomology 25, 147–155.Google Scholar
Fréchette, B., Alauzet, C. & Hemptinne, J.-L. (2003) Oviposition behaviour of two-pot ladybird beetle Adalia bipnctata (L.) (Coleopter:Coccinellidae) on plants with conspecific larval tracks. pp. 73–77 in Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Ecology of Aphidophaga: Biology, Ecology and Behaviour of Aphidophagous Insects. Arquipélago, Life and Marine Science. University of the Azores, Horta, Portugal.Google Scholar
Fréchette, B., Dixon, A.F.G., Alauzet, C. & Hemptinne, J.-L. (2004) Age and experience influence patch assessment for oviposition by an insect predator. Ecological Entomology 29, 578–583.Google Scholar
Gagne, I., Coderre, D. & Mauffette, Y. (2002) Egg cannibalism by Coleomegilla maculata lengi neonates: preference even in the presence of essential prey. Ecological Entomology 27, 285–291.Google Scholar
Hemptinne, J.-L., Lognay, G. & Dixon, A.F.G. (1998) Mate recognition in the two-spot ladybird beetle, Adalia bipunctata: role of chemical and behavioural cues. Journal of Insect Physiology 44, 1163–1171.Google Scholar
Hemptinne, J.-L., Lognay, G., Gauthier, C. & Dixon, A.F.G. (2000) Role of surface chemical signals in egg cannibalism and intraguild predation in ladybirds (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Chemoecology 10, 123–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemptinne, J.-L., Lognay, G., Doumbia, M. & Dixon, A.F.G. (2001) Chemical nature and persistence of the oviposition deterring pheromone in the tracks of the larvae of the two spot ladybird, Adalia bipunctata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Chemoecology 11, 43–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, S.B., Snyder, W.E. & Moore, A.J. (1999) Cannibalizing Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) larvae use endogenous cues to avoid eating relatives. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 12, 792–797.Google Scholar
Khan, M.R., Khan, M.R. & Hussein, M.Y. (2003) Cannibalism and interspecfic predation in ladybird beetle Coccinella septempuncta (L.), (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) in laboratory. Pakistan Journal of Biological Science 6, 2013–2016.Google Scholar
Klewer, N., Ruzicka, Z. & Schulz, S. (2007) (Z)-Pentacos-12-ene, an oviposition-deterring pheromone of Cheilomenes sexmaculata. Journal of Chemical Ecology 33, 2167–2170.Google Scholar
Lacy, R.C. & Sherman, P.W. (1982) Kin recognition by phenotype matching. The American Naturalist. 121, 489–512.Google Scholar
Laubertie, E., Martini, X., Cadena, C., Treilhou, M., Dixon, A.F.G. & Hemptinne, J.-L. (2006) The immediate source of the oviposition-deterring pheromone produced by larvae of Adalia bipunctata (L.) (Coleoptera, Coccinellidae). Journal of Insect Behavior 19, 231–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magro, A., Tene, J.N., Bastin, N., Dixon, A.F.G. & Hemptinne, J.-L. (2007) Assessment of patch quality by ladybirds: relative response to conspecific and heterospecific larval tracks a consequence of habitat similarity? Chemoecology 17, 37–45.Google Scholar
Mangel, M. (1989) Evolution of host selection in parastoids: Does the state of the parasitoid matter? American Naturalist 133, 688–705.Google Scholar
Martini, X., Haccou, P., Olivieri, I. & Hemptinne, J.-L. (2009) Evolution of cannibalism and female's response to oviposition-deterring pheromone in aphidophagous predators. Journal of Animal Ecology 78, 964–972.Google Scholar
McKay, T. & Broce, A.B. (2004) Discrimination of self-parasitized hosts by the pupal parasitoid Muscidifurax zaraptor (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 97, 592–599.Google Scholar
Mills, N.J. (1982) Voracity, cannibalism ans Coccinelid predation. Annals of Applied Biology 101, 144–148.Google Scholar
Nufio, C.R. & Papaj, D.R. (2001) Host marking behavior in phytophagous insects and parasitoids. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 99, 273–293.Google Scholar
Osawa, N. (1989) Sibling and non sibling cannibalism by larvae of a lady beetle Harmonia axyridis Pallas (Coleoptera, Coccinellidae) in the field. Researches on Population Ecology 31, 153–160.Google Scholar
Osawa, N. (2003) The influence of female oviposition strategy on sibling cannibalism in the ladybird beetle Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). European Journal of Entomology 100, 43–48.Google Scholar
Roitberg, B.D. & Mangel, M. (1988) On the evolutionary ecology of marking pheromones. Evolutionary Ecology 2, 289–315.Google Scholar
Ruzicka, Z. (1996) Oviposition-deterring pheromone in chrysopidae (Neuroptera): Intra- and interspecific effects. European Journal of Entomology 93, 161–166.Google Scholar
Ruzicka, Z. (1997) Recognition of oviposition-deterring allomones by aphidophagous predators (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae, Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). European Journal of Entomology 94, 431–434.Google Scholar
Ruzicka, Z. (2002) Persistence of deterrent larval tracks in Coccinella septempunctata, Cycloneda limbifer and Semiadalia undecimnotata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). European Journal of Entomology 99, 471–475.Google Scholar
Ruzicka, Z. (2006) Oviposition-deterring effects of conspecific and heterospecific larval tracks on Cheilomenes sexmaculata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). European Journal of Entomology 103, 757–763.Google Scholar
Ruzicka, Z. & Havelka, J. (1998) Effects of oviposition-deterring pheromone and allomones on Aphidoletes aphidimyza (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae). European Journal of Entomology 95, 211–216.Google Scholar
Sloggett, J.J. & Lorenz, M.W. (2008) Egg composition and reproductive investment in aphidophagous ladybird beetles (Coccinellidae: Coccinellini): egg development and interspecific variation. Physiological Entomology 33, 200–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ueno, T. (1994) Self recognition by the parasitic wasp Itoplectis naranyae (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae). Oikos 70, 333–339.Google Scholar
van Alphen, J.J.M. & Visser, M.E. (1990) Superparasitism as an adaptive strategy for insect parasitoids. Annual Review of Entomology 35, 59–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vandijken, M.J., Vanstratum, P. & Vanalphen, J.J.M. (1992) Recognition of individual specific marked parasitized hosts by the solitary parasitoid Epidinocarsis lopezi. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 30, 77–82.Google Scholar
van Zweden, J.S. & d'Ettorre, P. (2010) Nestmate recognition in social insects and the role of hydrocarbure. pp. 222–243in Blomquist, G.J. & Bagnères, A.-G. (Eds) Insect Hydrocarbons. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yasuda, H., Takagi, T. & Kogi, K. (2000) Effects of conspecific and heterospecific larval tracks on the oviposition behaviour of the predatory ladybird, Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). European Journal of Entomology 97, 551–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar