Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:13:13.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of perforated polyethylene sheeting on the alighting behaviour of aphids (Hemiptera: Aphididae) and their infestation of potato crops

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Anne L. Wilson  and
L. R. Taylor
Anne L. Wilson
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts., UK
L. R. Taylor
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts., UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Potato plots in southern England were covered by polyethylene sheeting perforated by 9-mm slits that opened to permit expansion as the plants grew. The slits admitted rain and also some aphids. Covered plants received 93% less immigrant aphids than exposed plants. The greatest protection was from Myzus persicae (Sulz.) (99%), whilst noncolonising species were reduced by 77%. It is improbable that the barrier to movement presented by the polyethylene would differentiate between incoming species or that M. persicae, for which potato is a preferred host, would escape more readily once inside the cover. This suggests that the behavioural barrier to alighting is in response to the reflection of high wavelength light at the polyethylene surface which affected M. persicae more than other species. The method has potential in protection of crops from aphids.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 71 , Issue 3 , September 1981 , pp. 395 - 402
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon. (1976). Growing potatoes before anyone else.—Br. Farm. & Stockbreeder 26.6.76, p. 33.Google Scholar
Adlerz, W. C. & Everett, P. H. (1968). Aluminium foil and white polyethylene mulches to repel aphids and control watermelon mosaic.—J. econ. Ent. 61, 1276–1279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cadman, C. H. & Chambers, J. (1960). Factors affecting the spread of aphid-borne viruses in potato in eastern Scotland. III. Effects of planting date, roguing and age of crop on the spread of potato leaf-roll and Y viruses.—Ann. appl. Biol. 48, 729–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eastop, V. F. (1955). Selection of aphid species by different kinds of insect traps.—Nature, Lond. 176, 936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fusco, R. A. & Thurston, R. (1970). Effect of coloured foils on green peach aphid infestations of hurley tobacco.—Tab. Sci. 14, 126–127.Google Scholar
Heathcote, G. D. (1968). Protection of sugar beet stecklings against aphids and viruses by cover crops and aluminium foil.—Pl. Path. 17, 158–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinze, K. (1967). Die Vergilbungskrankheit der Kohl- und Wasserrübe als Krankheitsursache auf Zierpflanzen.—Mitt. biol. BundAnst. Ld- u. Forstw. 121, 132–139.Google Scholar
Hille, Ris Lambers D. (1971). Aphids: their life cycles and their role as virus vectors.—pp. 36–56 in de Bokx, J. A. (Ed.). Viruses of potatoes and seed potato production.— 232 pp. Wageningen, Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation.Google Scholar
Kennedy, J. S., Booth, C. O. & Kershaw, W. J. S. (1959 a). Host finding by aphids in the field. I. Gynoparae of Myzus persicae (Sulzer).—Ann. appl. Biol. 47, 410–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, J. S., Booth, C. O. & Kershaw, W. J. S. (1959 b). Host finding by aphids in the field. II. Aphis fabae Scop, (gynoparae) and Brevicoryne brassicae L.; with a re-appraisal of the role of host-finding behaviour in virus spread.—Ann. appl. Biol. 47, 424–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, J. S., Booth, C. O. & Kershaw, W. J. S. (1961). Host finding by aphids in the field. III. Visual attraction.—Ann. Appl. Biol. 49, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kring, J. B. (1964). New ways to repel aphids.—Front. Pl Sci. 17, 6–7.Google Scholar
Lang, H. (1977). Folieneinsatz im zünftigen Frühkartoffelanbau.—Kartoffelbau 28, 10–13.Google Scholar
Moericke, V. (1950). Über das Farbensehen der Pfirsichblattlaus (Myzodes persicae Sulz.).—Z. Tierpsychol. 7, 265–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, H. J. (1958). The behaviour of Aphis fabae in selecting its host plants, especially different varieties of Vicia faba.—Entomologia exp. appl. 1, 66–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, H. J. (1962). Über die Ursachen der unterschiedlichen Resistenz von Vicia faba L. gegenüber der Bohnenblattlaus, Aphis (Doralis) fabae Scop. VIII. Das Verhalten geflügelter Bohnenläuse nach der Landung auf Wirten und Nichtwirten.—Entomologia exp. appl. 5, 189–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawicki, R. M., Devonshire, A. L., Rice, A. D., Moores, G. D., Petzing, S. M. & Cameron, A. (1978). The detection and distribution of organophosphorus and carbamate insecticide-resistant Myzus persicae (Sulz.) in Britain in 1976.—Pestic. Sci. 9, 189–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shands, W. A. & Simpson, G. W. (1972). Effects of aluminium foil mulches upon abundance of aphids on, and yield of potatoes in northeastern Maine.—J. econ. Ent. 65, 507–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, F. F., Johnson, G. V., Kahn, R. P. & Bing, A. (1964). Repellency of reflective aluminium to transient aphid virus-vectors.—Phytopathology 54, 748.Google Scholar
Taylor, L. R. (1965). Flight behaviour and aphid migration.—Proc. N. cent. Brch Ent. Soc. Amer. 20, 9–19.Google Scholar
Taylor, L. R. (1974). Monitoring change in the distribution and abundance of insects.—Rep. Rothamsted exp. Stn 1973, Part 2, 202–239.Google Scholar
Taylor, L. R. (1977 a). Aphid forecasting and the Rothamsted Insect Survey.—Jl R. agric. Soc. 138, 75–97.Google Scholar
Taylor, L. R. (1977 b). Migration and the spatial dynamics of an aphid, Myzus persicae.—J. Anim. Ecol. 46, 411–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, L. R. & French, R. A. (1979). Rothamsted Insect Survey. Tenth annual summary.—Rep. Rothamsted exp. Stn 1978, Part 2, 137–173.Google Scholar