Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T06:31:53.597Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The ecology of the mosquitos of the Northern Guinea Savannah of Nigeria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

M. W. Service
Affiliation:
Malaria Unit, Ministry of Health, Kaduna, Northern Nigeria.

Extract

The ecology of the adult mosquitos of the Northern Guinea Savannah was studied from 1960 to 1962 in the Kaduna area mainly in two Hausa villages, Anguwun Rimi and Kangimi, and in nearby Fulani settlements. A description of the area and various types of village huts is given together with an account of the climate and meteorological data. Emphasis was on the Anophelines and their relation to malaria but at the same time information on the Culicines is presented.

Biting catches, in which mosquito scouts acting as human bait collected adults in test-tubes, were performed for over a year in A. Rimi. A total of 38 species was caught in these collections, but many appeared only infrequently. By far the commonest mosquito biting man was Anopheles gambiae Giles which had its peak density towards the end of the rains, in September, and although its population was greatly reduced during the dry season it however remained the principal anthropophilous species. In the area in which the catches were performed A. nili (Theo.) was the second commonest mosquito, and with the exception of March it was more abundant than A. funestus Giles. In other areas it was not so common, and in Kangimi A. funestus was almost as abundant during the rains as A. gambiae, and at the beginning of the dry season it became the main Anopheline. Most of the other Anophelines that were taken at bait were only caught in any numbers during the latter part of the wet season; for the remainder of the year they were virtually absent. Mansonia uniformis (Theo.) was abundant in October, but for the rest of the year it was rarely taken; M. africana (Theo.) was found to be uncommon in the area. Due to the close proximity of Kaduna to A. Rimi, Culex pipiens fatigans Weid., a species now associated with urbanisation and not with villages, was common. Both bait catches and pyrethrum spray-sheet collections in houses showed that it greatly increased in numbers at the beginning of the rains, but that this high level of density was not maintained, and during the greater part of the wet season the species was less common than in the early rains. Aedes aegypti (L.) sens. lat. was rare both in houses and in bait catches; the two principal Aedes species were Ae. vittatus (Big.) and Ae. furcifer (Edw.); the latter species is confined to the Savannah zones. The biting cycles of the three main Anophelines were characterised by maximum feeding occurring after midnight. In both A. gambiae and A. nili there were two main peaks, between 2400 and 0100 and between 0300 and 0400 hr.; in A. funestus, maximum biting occurred between 2400 and 0200 and between 0300 and 0400 hr.

By the use of mosquito nets baited with humans, both inside huts and out of doors, the relative attractiveness, to the anthropophilous Anophelines, of man in the two situations was assessed. It was found that A. nili was equally attracted to man in both situations, and although slightly greater numbers of A. gambiae and A. funestus were found biting out of doors, for practical purposes man is equally attractive in both places. Certain species, notably A. coustani Lav. sens, str. and A. hancocki var. brohieri Edw., were rare or absent in the inside and outside bait-net collections, whereas they were readily taken in both situations in test-tube catches performed in the same locality on the same nights. In fact, more specimens of A. coustani sens. str. were taken in the outside test-tube catches than of either A. funestus or A. nili, and A. hancocki var.brohieri was commoner than A. funestus.

Catches of adults from mud walls and thatch roofing of typical round village huts showed that there was generally no appreciable difference in the attractiveness of these two surfaces to either A. gambiae or A. funestus, but as the thatch only comprised about 34–44 per cent, of the internal surface area of the huts the absolute number resting on the walls will be greater than on the roof.

Spray-sheet collections showed that besides large numbers of A. gambiae and A. funestus resting; during the day-time in normal mud-walled living huts of the Hausa, high densities of these species were found in the Fulani huts, which do not incorporate any mud in their design, and moderate numbers were also caught in Hausa villages in the zaures (huts resembling living ones, but without doors, furniture or fires and not normally slept in at night). Collections from outdoor resting places demonstrated that considerable day-time resting occurred in uninhabited huts, under eaves of huts, both inside and under eaves of goat stables, in kitchens, amongst the tightly woven grass mats termed ‘ zana ’ matting, in rodent holes, tree holes, pots, near wells, amongst grass and vegetation and underneath and under the eaves of grain bins. Surprisingly few examples of A. nili were found in any of the outside resting shelters examined, despite the fact that both exit traps and spray-sheet collections showed that it bit freely in huts but rarely stayed in them. The large number of A. gambiae and A. funestus found out of doors, coupled with the exodus of blood-fed individuals from huts, showed that an appreciable amount of exophily occurred in both species. Entrance traps fitted to village huts caught, in addition to unfed, both blood-fed and gravid (taken to include half-gravid and full-gravid) females of A. gambiae and A. funestus, suggesting that a certain amount of exophagy and re-entry of gravid individuals was occurring. Numerous precipitin tests were made on blood-meals obtained from A. gambiae, A. funestus and A. nili. and a few also from most of the other species. Results showed that the three principal Anophelines were strongly anthropophilous but the exophilous population of A. funestus and A. gambiae showed some deviation to other vertebrates. Most of the other Anophelines, e.g., A. rufipes (Gough) sens, lat.,A. hancocki var. brohieri, A. flavicosta Edw. and A. longipalpis var.domicolus Edw., found resting in goat shelters and other outdoor sites had fed mainly on other vertebrates.

On account of the already available information on the infectivity of both A. gambiae and A. funestus in Northern Nigeria, dissections for estimation of sporozoite rates were only carried out on their exophilous populations, and in both species these were shown to contribute to malaria transmission. Attention was concentrated on dissecting the other Anophelines, special attention being paid to A. nili. Only two species were found with infected salivary glands. A. flavicosta had a crude sporozoite rate of 2·74 per cent, of the 73 dissected, and from 998 examples of A. nili a crude sporozoite rate of 0·80 per cent, was obtained. It was thought that as A. flavicosta was mainly zoophilous it was possible that the sporozoites in the glands were of malaria not of human origin. It appeared that where A. nili was common it could become a secondary vector, and on account of its marked exophilic nature it might prove difficult to interrupt transmisssion by this species.

The relatively recent increase in towns of C. p. fatigans and the almost virtual disappearance of C. nebulosus Theo., formerly the predominant Culicine, and the possibility that this change might have been initiated by the practice in recent years of using DDT larvicidal formulations and not oil, is discussed.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adam, J. P., Bruce-Chwatt, L. J. & Hamon, J. (1956). Contribution à l'étude des Culicidae (diptères) de la région éthiopienne. Description du mâle et de quelques variations de la femelle et des premiers stades d'Anopheles domicolus Edwards, 1916.—Bull. Soc. Path. exot. 49 pp. 100108.Google Scholar
Adam, J. P., Hamon, J., Rickenbach, A. & Lips, M. (1956). I. Description du mâle et du pharynx de la femelle d'Anopheles brohieri Edwards 1929 et A. hancocki var. masseguini Hamon 1954. II. Etude des affinités existant entre Anopheles hancocki, A. hancocki var. masseguini, A. brohieri, A. theileri, A. seydeli.—Bull. Soc. Path. exot. 49 pp. 747758.Google Scholar
Bailey, N. T. J. (1959). Statistical methods in biology.200 pp. London, Engl. Univ. Pr.Google Scholar
Barber, M. A., Rice, J. B. & Brown, J. Y. (1932). Malaria studies on the Firestone rubber plantation in Liberia, West Africa.—Amer. J. Hyg. 15 pp. 601633.Google Scholar
Boorman, J. [P. T.] (1960a). Studies of the biting habits of the mosquito Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti, Linn., in a West African village.—W. Afr. med. J. (N.S.) 9 pp. 111122.Google Scholar
Boorman, J. [P. T.] (1960b). Studies on the biting habits of six species of Culicine mosquitoes in a West African village.—W. Afr. med. J. (N.S.) 9 pp. 235246.Google Scholar
Boorman, J. P. T. & Service, M. W. (1960). Some records of mosquitoes (Culicidae Diptera) from the Niger Delta area, southern Nigeria.—W. Afr. med. J. (N.S.) 9 pp. 6772.Google ScholarPubMed
Bruce-chwatt, L. J. (1952). Malaria in Nigeria (Part II).—W. Afr. med. J. 1 pp. 153158.Google Scholar
Bruce-chwatt, L. J. (1953). Report on pre-control malaria surveys of the Western Sokoto area in 1953.—27 pp., multigraph. Yaba, Lagos, Malaria Serv. (Unpublished.)Google Scholar
Bruce-chwatt, L. J. (1955). Malaria control pilot project in Western Sokoto, Northern Nigeria. First annual report, 1954–55.—81 pp., multigraph. Yaba, Lagos, Malaria Serv. (Unpublished.)Google Scholar
Bruce-chwatt, L. J. (1956). Malaria control pilot project in Western Sokoto, Northern Nigeria. Second Annual Report, 1955–56.—48 pp., multi-graph. Yaba, Lagos, Malaria Serv. (Unpublished.)Google Scholar
Burnett, G. F. (1957). Trials of residual insecticides against Anophelines in African-type huts.—Bull. ent. Res. 48 pp. 631668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draper, C. C. & Smith, A. (1957). Malaria in the Pare area of N.E. Tanganyika. Part I: Epidemiology.—Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 51 pp. 137151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelfand, H. M. (1947). Natural malaria infection in Anopheles rufipes (Gough). —J. trop. Med. Hyg. 50 pp. 159160.Google ScholarPubMed
Gillies, M. T. (1954a). Studies of house leaving and outside resting of Anopheles gambiae Giles and Anopheles funestus Giles in East Africa. I.–The outside resting population.—Bull. ent. Res. 45 pp. 361373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillies, M. T. (1954b). Studies in house leaving and outside resting of Anopheles gambiae Giles and Anopheles funestus Giles in East Africa. II.–The exodus from houses and the house resting population.—Bull. ent. Res. 45 pp. 375387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillies, M. T. (1956). The problem of exophily in Anopheles gambiae.—Bull. World Hlth Org. 15 pp. 437449.Google ScholarPubMed
Gordon, R. M., Hicks, E. P., Davey, T. H. & Watson, M. (1932). A study of the house-haunting Culicidae occurring in Freetown, Sierra Leone …Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 26 pp. 273345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadaway, A. B. & Barlow, F. (1951). Studies on aqueous suspensions of insecticides.— Bull. ent. Res. 41 pp. 603622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haddow, A. J., Gillett, J. D. & Highton, R. B. (1947). The mosquitoes of Bwamba County, Uganda. V.—The vertical distribution and biting cycle of mosquitoes in rain forest, with further observations on microclimate.— Bull. ent. Res. 37 pp. 301330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haddow, A. J., van Someren, E. C. C., Lumsden, W. H. R., Harper, J. O. & Gillett, J. D. (1951). The mosquitoes of Bwamba County, Uganda. VIII.—Records of occurrence, behaviour and habitat.—Bull. ent. Res. 42 pp. 207238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamon, J. (in press). Les moustiques anthropophiles de la région de Bobo Dioulasso, République de Haute Volta.—Ann. Soc. ent. Fr.Google Scholar
Hamon, J. & Mouchet, J. (1961). Les vecteurs secondaires du paludisme humain en Afrique.—Méd. trop. 21 pp. 643660.Google Scholar
Hanney, P. W. (1960). The mosquitos of Zaria Province, Northern Nigeria.— Bull. ent. Res. 51 pp. 145171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, E. P. (1932). The transmission of Wuchereria bancrofti in Sierra Leone.—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 26 pp. 407422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgkin, E. P. (1950). On the dissection of mosquitoes for malaria parasites and the information to be derived therefrom.—Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 43 pp. 617634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holstein, M. (1950). Un nouveau vecteur du paludisme en A.O.F. Anopheles rufipes (Gough 1910).—Bull. Soc. Path. exot. 43 pp. 140143.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. B. (1919). Domestic mosquitoes of the northern provinces of Nigeria.—Bull. ent. Res. 9 pp. 325332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattingly, P. F. (1949). Studies on West African forest mosquitos. Part I. The seasonal distribution, biting cycle and vertical distribution of four of the principal species.—Bull. ent. Res. 40 pp. 149168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Meillon, B. (1951). Species and varieties of malaria vectors in Africa and their bionomics.—Bull. World Hlth Org. 4 pp. 419441.Google ScholarPubMed
Muirhead-Thomson, R. C. (1948). Studies on Anopheles gambiae and A. melas in and around Lagos.—Bull. ent. Res. 38 pp. 527558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muirhead-Thomson, R. C. (1951). Studies on salt-water and fresh-water Anopheles gambiae on the East African coast.—Bull. ent. Res. 41 pp. 487502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash, T. A. M. (1948). Tsetse flies in British West Africa.77 pp. [London] Colon. Off.Google Scholar
Rivola, E. & Holstein, M. H. (1957). Note sur une variété d'Anopheles nili Theo.— Bull. Soc. Path. exot. 50 pp. 382387.Google ScholarPubMed
Service, M. W. (1962). Keys to the West African Anophelini.—Acta trop. 19 pp. 120158.Google Scholar
Service, M. W. (1964a). An analysis of individual and seasonal variations occurring in the wing ornamentation of Anopheles (Cellia) funestus Giles (Diptera: Culicidae).—Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (B) 33. (In press.)Google Scholar
Service, M. W. (1964b). Two extreme albinoid Anopheles (Myzomyia) gambiae Giles (Diptera: Culicidae) from Northern Nigeria.—Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (B) 33. (In press.)Google Scholar
Service, M. W. (in press). The attraction of mosquitoes by animal baits in the Northern Guinea Savannah of Nigeria.—J. ent. Soc. S. Afr.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1962). Studies on the domestic habits of A. gambiae that affect its vulnerability to insecticides. Part I. Resting places in huts.—E. Afr. med. J. 39pp. 1524.Google Scholar
Smith, A. & Draper, C. C. (1959). Malaria in the Taveta area of Kenya and Tanganyika. Part I. Epidemiology.—E. Afr. med. J. 36 pp. 99113.Google Scholar
van Someren, E. C. C., Teesdale, C. & Furlong, M. (1955). The mosquitos of the Kenya coast; records of occurrence, behaviour and habitat.—Bull. ent. Res. 46 pp. 463493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, A. (1961). A synoptic catalog of the mosquitoes of the world, supplement I (Diptera: Culicidae).—Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 63 pp. 2952.Google Scholar
Stone, A., Knight, K. L. & Starcke, H. (1959). A synoptic catalog of the mosquitoes of the world (Diptera, Culicidae).358 pp. Washington, D.C., Ent. Soc. Amer.Google Scholar
Taylor, A. W. (1930). The domestic mosquitos of Gadau, Northern Nigeria, and their relation to malaria and filariasis.—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 24 pp. 425435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, T. C. E. (1956). A note on the occurrence of Culex (Culex) pipiens fatigans in Sierra Leone.—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 50 pp. 421425.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed