Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T16:37:43.216Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Do nymphs and adults of three Neotropical zoophytophagous mirids damage leaves and fruits of tomato?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2016

D.B. Silva ,
V.H.P. Bueno ,
F.J. Calvo  and
J.C. van Lenteren
D.B. Silva
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Biological Control, Department of Entomology, Federal University of Lavras, P.O. Box 3037, 37200–000 Lavras, MG, Brazil
V.H.P. Bueno*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Biological Control, Department of Entomology, Federal University of Lavras, P.O. Box 3037, 37200–000 Lavras, MG, Brazil Laboratory for Chemical Ecology and Insect Behavior, Department of Entomology and Acarology, ESALQ/USP, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
F.J. Calvo
Affiliation:
R&D Department, Koppert Spain SL, Calle Cobre 22, Polıgono Industrial Ciudad del Transporte, 04745 La Mojonera, Almeria, Spain
J.C. van Lenteren
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Chemical Ecology and Insect Behavior, Department of Entomology and Acarology, ESALQ/USP, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil Laboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
*
*Author for correspondence Phone: +55 (19) 3429-4199 Fax: +55 (19) 3429-4120 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The predators Macrolophus basicornis (Stal), Engytatus varians (Distant) and Campyloneuropsis infumatus (Carvalho) consume large numbers of tomato pests such as Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) and Tuta absoluta (Meyrick). However, they are zoophytophagous and feed on plant parts as well. We evaluated the type and effect of injury caused by nymphs and adults of these mirids on tomato seedlings and fruit in the absence of prey. For each mirid species, seedlings were exposed to groups of 20 nymphs or adults for 72 h, and fruits were exposed for 48 h to groups of four nymphs or adults. Type and the number of injury on stems, petioles and leaflets of tomato seedlings and fruits were recorded after removal of insects. Nymphs and adults of these mirids caused necrotic rings on the leaflets, but no injury was observed on stem and petioles. The necrotic rings on leaflets consisted of blemishes, characterized by feeding punctures surrounded by a yellowish, bleached area. The number of necrotic rings did not exceed one per individual mirid and seedlings developed normally. Nymphs also caused feeding punctures on tomato fruit, but in even lower numbers than on leaflets. Two weeks after the start of the experiment the tomato fruit still looked fresh and feeding punctures had disappeared. Adults did not cause any injury to tomato fruit. The results indicate that nymphs and adults of these zoophytophagous mirids cause little injury to tomato seedlings and fruit, even when present in high densities and in the absence of prey, making them interesting candidates for biological control.

Keywords

Macrolophus basicornisEngytatus variansCampyloneuropsis infumatusTuta absolutaplant injuryfruit injurybiological control
Type
Research Papers
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 107 , Issue 2 , April 2017 , pp. 200 - 207
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albajes, R., Castané, C., Gabarra, R. & Alomar, O. (2006) Risks of plant damage caused by natural enemies introduced for arthropod biological control. pp. 132–144 in Bigler, F., Babendreier, D., Kuhlmann, U. (Eds) Environmental Impact of Invertebrates for Biological Control of Arthropods: Methods and Risk Assessment. Wallingford, UK, CABI.Google Scholar
Alomar, O. & Albajes, R. (1996) Greenhouse whitefly (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) predation and tomato fruit injury by the zoophytophagous predator Dicyphus tamaninii (Heteroptera: Miridae). pp. 155–177 in Alomar, O. & Wiedenmann, R.N. (Eds) Zoophytophagous Heteroptera: Implications for Life History and Integrated Pest Management. Lanham, USA, Entomological Society of America.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alomar, O. & Wiedenmann, R.N. (1996) Zoophytophagous Heteroptera: Implications for Life History and Integrated Pest Management. Lanham, USA, Entomological Society of America, 202p.Google Scholar
Arnó, J., Matas, M., Marti, M., Ariño, J., Roing, J. & Gabarra, R. (2005) Coexistence between Trialeurodes vaporariorum and Bemisia tabaci and impact of natural enemies in tomato crops under Mediterranean conditions. IOBC/WPRS Bulletin 28, 1–4.Google Scholar
Arnó, J., Castañe, C., Riudavets, J. & Gabarra, R. (2006) Characterization of damage to tomato plants produced by the zoophytophagous predator Nesidiocoris tenuis . IOBC/WPRS Bulletin 29, 249–254.Google Scholar
Arnó, J., Castañe, C., Riudavets, J. & Gabarra, R. (2010) Risk of damage to tomato crops by the generalist zoophytophagous predator Nesidiocoris tenuis (Reuter) (Hemiptera: Miridae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 100, 105–115.Google Scholar
Bueno, V.H.P. & van Lenteren, J.C. (2012) Predatory bugs (Heteroptera). pp. 539–569 in Panizzi, A.R. & Parra, J.R.P. (Eds) Insect Bioecology and Nutrition for Integrated Pest Management. Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press.Google Scholar
Bueno, V.H.P., Montes, F.C., Pereira, A.M.C., Lins, J.C. Jr. & van Lenteren, J.C. (2012) Can recently found Brazilian hemipteran predatory bugs control Tuta absoluta? IOBC/WPRS Bulletin 80, 63–67.Google Scholar
Bueno, V.H.P., van Lenteren, J.C., Lins, J.C. Jr., Calixto, A.M.C., Montes, F.C., Silva, D.B., Santiago, L. & Pérez, L.H. (2013) New records of Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) predation by Brazilian Hemipteran predatory bugs. Journal of Applied Entomology 137, 29–34.Google Scholar
Calvo, F.J., Bolckmans, K., Stansly, P. & Urbaneja, A. (2009) Predation by Nesidiocoris tenuis on Bemisia tabaci and injury to tomato. BioControl 54, 237–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvo, F.J., Bolckmans, K. & Belda, J. (2011) Control of Bemisia tabaci and Frankliniella occidentalis in cucumber by Amblyseius swirskii . BioControl 56, 185–192.Google Scholar
Calvo, F.J., Bolckmans, K. & Belda, J.E. (2012 a) Release rate for a pre-plant application of Nesidiocoris tenuis for Bemisia tabaci control in tomato. BioControl 57, 809–817.Google Scholar
Calvo, F.J., Lorente, M.J., Stansly, P. & Belda, J.E. (2012 b) Preplant release of Nesidiocoris tenuis and supplementary tactics for control of Tuta absoluta and Bemisa tabaci in greenhouse tomato. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 143, 111–119.Google Scholar
Calvo, F.J., Soriano, J., Bolckmans, K. & Belda, J.E. (2012 c) A successful method for whitefly and Tuta absoluta control in tomato. Evaluation after two years of application in practice. IOBC/WPRS Bulletin 80, 237–244.Google Scholar
Calvo, F.J., Torres-Ruiz, A., Velázquez-González, J.C., Rodríguez-Leyva, E. & Lomeli-Flores, J.R. (2016) Evaluation of Dicyphus hesperus for biological control of sweet potato whitefly and potato psyllid on greenhouse tomato. BioControl 61, 415–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, W. (1973) Insects in Relation to Plant Disease. 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, 759p.Google Scholar
Castañé, C., Alomar, O. & Riudavets, J. (2003) Potential risk of damage to zucchinis caused by mirid bugs. IOBC/WPRS Bulletin 26, 135–138.Google Scholar
Castañé, C., Alomar, O., Goula, M. & Gabarra, R. (2004) Colonization of tomato greenhouses by the predatory mirid bugs Macrolophus caliginosus and Dicyphus tamaninii . Biological Control 30, 591–597.Google Scholar
Castañé, C., Arnó, J., Gabarra, R. & Alomar, O. (2011) Plant damage to vegetable crops by zoophytophagous mirid predators. Biological Control 59, 22–29.Google Scholar
Cohen, A.C. (1996) Plant feeding by predatory Heteroptera: evolutionary and adaptational aspects of trophic switching. pp. 1–17 in Alomar, O. & Wiedenmann, R.N. (Eds) Zoophytophagous Heteroptera: Implications for Life History and Integrated Pest Management. Lanham, USA, Entomological Society of America.Google Scholar
Coll, M. & Guershon, M. (2002) Omnivory in terrestrial arthropods: mixing plant and prey diets. Annual Review of Entomology 47, 267–297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Desneux, N., Luna, M.G., Guillema, U.D.T. & Urbaneja, A. (2011) The invasive South American tomato pinworm, Tuta absoluta, continues to spread in Afro-Eurasia and beyond: the new threat to tomato world production. Journal of Pest Science 84, 403–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Dessouki, S.A., El-Kifl, A.H. & Helal, H.A. (1976) Life cycle, host plants and symptoms of damage of the tomato bug, Nesidiocoris tenuis Reut. (Heteroptera: Miridae) in Egypt. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection 83, 204–220.Google Scholar
EPPO - European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization (2015) Data base on quarantine pests. Available online at http://www.eppo.int. (accessed 13 March 2016).Google Scholar
FAOSTAT (2015) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available online at http://faostat3.fao.org/download/Q/QC/E. (accessed 13 March 2016).Google Scholar
Gillespie, D. & Mcgregor, R. (2000) The functions of plant feeding in the omnivorous predator Dicyphus hesperus: water places limits on predation. Ecological Entomology 25, 380–386.Google Scholar
Gillespie, D.R., Mcgregor, R., Sanchez, J.A., Van Laerhoven, S.L., Quiring, D.M.J., Roitberg, B.D., Foottit, R.G., Schwartz, M.D. & Shipp, J.L. (2007) An endemic omnivorous predator for control of greenhouse pests. pp. 128–135 in Vincent, C., Goettel, M. & Lazarovits, G. (Eds) Biological Control: A Global Perspective. Wallingford, UK, CABI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guedes, R.N.C. & Siqueira, H.A.A. (2012) The tomato borer Tuta absoluta: insecticide resistance and control failure. CAB Reviews 7, 1–7.Google Scholar
Hamdi, F., Chadoeuf, J. & Bonato, O. (2013) Functional relationships between plant feeding and prey feeding for a zoophytophagous bug. Physiological Entomology 38, 241–245.Google Scholar
Lalonde, R.G., McGregor, R.R., Gillespie, D.R. & Roitberg, B.D. (1999) Plant-feeding by arthropod predators contributes to the stability of predator-prey population dynamics. Oikos 1, 603–608.Google Scholar
Lucas, É. & Alomar, O. (2002) Impact of Macrolophus caliginosus presence on damage production by Dicyphus tamaninii (Heteroptera: Miridae) on tomato fruits. Journal of Economic Entomology 95, 1123–1129.Google Scholar
McGregor, R.R., Gillespie, D.R., Park, C.G., Quiring, D.M.J. & Foisy, M.R.J. (2000) Leaves or fruit? The potential for damage to tomato fruits by the omnivorous predator, Dicyphus hesperus . Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 95, 325–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moerkens, R., Berckmoes, E., Van Damme, V., Ortega-Parra, N., Hanssen, I., Wuytack, M. & De Vis, R. (2016) High population densities of Macrolophus pygmaeus on tomato plants can cause economic fruit damage: interaction with pepino mosaic virus? Pest Management Science 72, 1350–1358.Google Scholar
Mohamed, E., Mahmoud, M., Elhaj, M., Mohamed, S. & Ekesi, S. (2015) Host plants record for tomato leaf miner Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) in Sudan. EPPO Bulletin 45, 108–111.Google Scholar
Mollá, O., Biondi, A., Alonso-Valiente, M. & Urbaneja, A. (2014) A comparative life history study of two mirid bugs preying on Tuta absoluta and Ephestia kuehniella eggs on tomato crops: implications for biological control. BioControl 59, 175–183.Google Scholar
Naranjo, S.E. & Gibson, R.L. (1996) Phytophagy in predaceous Heteroptera: effects on life history and population dynamics. pp. 57–93 in Alomar, O. & Wiedenmann, R. (Eds) Zoophytophagous Heteroptera: Implications for Life History and Integrated Pest Management. Lanham, USA, Entomological Society of America.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, D., Muniappan, R., Sall, D., Diatta, P., Diongue, A. & Dieng, E. (2013) First record of Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) in Senegal. Florida Entomologist 96, 661–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pimentel, D. & Burgess, M. (2014) Environmental and economic costs of the application of pesticides primarily in the United States. pp. 47–71 in Pimentel, D. & Peshin, R. (Eds) Integrated Pest Management. Dordrecht, The Netherlands, Springer.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team (2014) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria, R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Sanchez, J.A. (2008) Zoophytophagy in the plantbug Nesidiocoris tenuis . Agricultural and Forest Entomology 10, 75–80.Google Scholar
Sanchez, J.A. (2009) Density thresholds for Nesidiocoris tenuis (Heteroptera: Miridae) in tomato crops. Biological Control 51, 493–498.Google Scholar
Sanchez, J.A. & Lacasa, A. (2008) Impact of the zoophytophagous plant bug Nesidiocoris tenuis (Heteroptera: Miridae) on tomato yield. Journal of Economic Entomology 101, 1864–1870.Google Scholar
Sanchez, J.A., Gillespie, D.R. & McGregor, R.R. (2003) The effects of mullein plants (Verbascum thapsus) on the population dynamics of Dicyphus hesperus (Heteroptera: Miridae) in tomato greenhouses. Biological Control 28, 313–319.Google Scholar
Shipp, J.L. & Wang, K. (2006) Evaluation of Dicyphus hesperus (Heteroptera: Miridae) for biological control of Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on greenhouse tomato. Journal of Economic Entomology 99, 414–420.Google Scholar
Silva, D.B., Bueno, V.H.P., Montes, F.C. & van Lenteren, J.C. (2016) Population growth of three mirid predatory bugs feeding on eggs and larvae of Tuta absoluta on tomato. BioControl. doi: 10.1007/s10526-016-9736-1.Google Scholar
Urbaneja, A., Tapia, G. & Stansly, P. (2005) Influence of host plant and prey availability on developmental time and survivorship of Nesidiocoris tenuis (Het.: Miridae). Biocontrol Science and Technology 15, 513–518.Google Scholar
Urbaneja, A., Montón, H. & Mollá, O. (2009) Suitability of the tomato borer Tuta absoluta as prey for Macrolophus pygmaeus and Nesidiocoris tenuis . Journal of Applied Entomology 133, 292–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Lenteren, J.C. (2012) The state of commercial augmentative biological control: plenty of natural enemies, but a frustrating lack of uptake. BioControl 57, 1–20.Google Scholar
van Lenteren, J.C., Bueno, V.H.P., Calvo, F.J., Calixto, A.M., Montes, F.C. & Soares, M.A. (2016 a) Phytophagy and comparative effectiveness of three new Neotropical mirid predators of Tuta absoluta on tomato. BioControl (under review).Google Scholar
van Lenteren, J.C., Hemerik, L., Lins, J.C. & Bueno, V.H.P. (2016 b) Functional responses of three Neotropical mirid predators to eggs of Tuta absoluta on tomato. Insects. doi: 10.3390/insects7030034.Google Scholar
Wheeler, A.G. (2001) Biology of the Plant Bugs (Hemiptera: Miridae): Pests, Predators, Opportunists. Ithaca, USA, Cornell University Press, 507 p.Google Scholar
White, T.C.R. (1978) The importance of a relative shortage of food in animal ecology. Oecologia 33, 71–86.Google Scholar
Wiedenmann, R.N., Legaspi, J.C. & O'Neil, J.O. (1996) Impact of prey density and facultative plant feeding on the life history of the predator Podisus maculiventris (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). pp. 94–118 in Alomar, O. & Wiedenman, R.N. (Eds) Zoophytophagous Heteroptera: Implications for Life History and Integrated Pest Management. Lanham, USA, Entomological Society of America.Google Scholar