Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:40:51.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The dispersal and survival of laboratory-bred and native Glossina morsitans morsitans Westw. (Diptera, Glossinidae) in the field

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

D. A. Dame ,
D. R. Birkenmeyer ,
T. A. M. Nash  and
A. M. Jordan
D. A. Dame
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Salisbury, Rhodesia
D. R. Birkenmeyer
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Salisbury, Rhodesia
T. A. M. Nash
Affiliation:
Tsetse Research Laboratory, University of Bristol, School of Veterinary Science, Langford, Bristol BS18 7DU, England
A. M. Jordan
Affiliation:
Tsetse Research Laboratory, University of Bristol, School of Veterinary Science, Langford, Bristol BS18 7DU, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The performance of native and laboratory-bred Glossina morsitans morsitans Westw. was observed in Kariba, Rhodesia, the original natural habitat of the colonised Langford strain. After two years in captivity, the Langford strain was similar to the native strain in survival, dispersal, and rate of recovery in the field. No differences were detected in laboratory studies of the mating behaviour of the two strains. Native-strain males sterilised in the pupal stage with tepa were similar to untreated males in dispersal, survival, and rate of recovery. Also, both the released laboratory-bred flies and the released native strain flies compared favourably with the native population.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 65 , Issue 3 , October 1975 , pp. 453 - 457
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Buxton, P. A. (1955). The natural history of tsetse flies. An account of the biology of the genus Glossina (Diptera).—Mem. Lond. Sch. Hyg. trop. Med. no. 10, 816 pp.Google Scholar
Dame, D. A. & Ford, H. R. (1966). Effect of the chemosterilant tepa on Glossina morsitans Westw.—Bull. ent. Res. 56, 649–658.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dame, D. A., Birkenmeyer, D. R. & Bursell, E. (1969). Development of the thoracic muscle and flight behaviour of Glossina morsitans orientalis Vanderplank.—Bull. ent. Res. 59, 345–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dame, D. A., Azevedo, J. F., Smith, H. C. & Ferreira, A. E. (1970). Behaviour of colonized and native male Glossina morsitans orientalis Vanderplank in the laboratory. In de Azevedo, J. F. (Ed.) Tsetse fly breeding under laboratory conditions and its practical application. 1st International Symposium 22nd and 23rd 04 1969. 91–96. Lisbon, Junta de Investigaçöes do Ultramar.Google Scholar
Jordan, A. M., Nash, T. A. M. & Trewern, M. A. (1970). The performance of crosses between wild and laboratory-bred Glossina morsitans orientalis Vanderplank.—Bull. ent. Res. 60, 333–337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kernaghan, R. J. & Nash, T. A. M. (1964). A technique for the dispatch of pupae of Glossina and other insects by air from the tropics.—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 58, 355–358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nash, T. A. M. (1969). The establishment and value of large, self-maintaining colonies of tsetse flies (Glossina spp.).—Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 1, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar