Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:38:44.584Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diapause and laboratory breeding of Phlebotomus perniciosus Newstead and Phlebotomus ariasi Tonnoir (Diptera: Psychodidae) from southern France

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

P. D. Ready  and
H. Croset
P. D. Ready
Affiliation:
Laboratoire d’Ecologie médicale et Pathologie parasitaire, Faculté de Médecine de Montpellier, France
H. Croset
Affiliation:
Laboratoire d’Ecologie médicale et Pathologie parasitaire, Faculté de Médecine de Montpellier, France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Observations are reported on diapause and laboratory breeding of Phlebotomus perniciosus Newst. and P. ariasi Tonnoir, the two phlebotomine sandflies incriminated as vectors of visceral leishmaniasis in southern France. Previous field studies had suggested that both species are univoltine in southern France, but the present laboratory investigations showed that diapause is obligatory for neither species. Temperature (both species) and photoperiod (P. perniciosus) were found to affect diapause-induction, and diapause was commonly determined before the overwintering stage (the fourth-instar larva). The results showed that P. perniciosus can be mass-reared for at least three uninterrupted generations each year if it is maintained at 28°C in LD 17:7. Further investigations are needed if P. ariasi is also to be bred in sufficient numbers for epidemiological experiments; its colonisation was prevented primarily by low fertility, and attempts at forced insemination were unsuccessful.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 70 , Issue 3 , September 1980 , pp. 511 - 523
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, S. & Theodor, O. (1935). Investigations on Mediterranean kala azar. VIII.—Further observations on Mediterranean sandflies.—Proc. R. Soc. (B) 116, 505–515.Google Scholar
Barretto, M. P. (1941). Sôbre a astenobiose do Phlebotomus whitmani Antunes e Coutinho, 1939 (Diptera, Psychodidae).—Revta bras. Biol. 1, 305–310.Google Scholar
Chaniotis, B. N. (1967). The biology of California Phlebotomus (Diptera: Psychodidae) under laboratory conditions.—J. med. Entomol. 4, 221–233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Croset, H. (1969). Ecologie et systématique des Phlebotomini.—516 pp. Doctoral thesis, Univ. Montpellier, France.Google Scholar
Croset, H., Rioux, J. A., Léger, N., Houin, R, Soussi, M. C, Benmansour, N. & Maistre, M. (1977). Les méthodes d’échantillonnage des populations de phlébotomes en région Méditerranéenne.—Colloques int. Cent. natn. Rech. scient. no. 239, 139–151.Google Scholar
Harwood, R. F. (1965). Observations on distribution and biology of Phlebotomus sandflies from northwestern North America (Diptera: Psychodidae).—Pan-Pacif. Ent. 41, 1–4.Google Scholar
Johnson, P. T. & Hertig, M. (1961). The rearing of Phlebotomus sandflies (Diptera: Psychodidae). II. Development and behavior of Panamanian sandflies in laboratory culture.—Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 54, 764–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Killick-Kendrick, R., Leaney, A. J. & Ready, P. D. (1977). The establishment, maintenance and productivity of a laboratory colony of Lutzomyia longipalpis (Diptera: Psychodidae).—J. med. Entomol. 13, 429–440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lees, A. D. (1955). The physiology of diapause in arthropods.—151 pp. Cambridge University Press (quoted by Saunders, 1976).Google Scholar
Lewis, D. J. (1971). Phlebotomid sandflies.—Bull. Wld Hlth Org. 44, 535–551.Google ScholarPubMed
Lindquist, A. W. (1936). Notes on the habits and biology of a sand fly, Phlebotomus diabolicus Hall, in southwestern Texas (Diptera: Psychodidae).—Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 38, 29–32.Google Scholar
Perfil’ev, P. P. (1968). Insecta Diptera. Vol. III no. 2. Sandflies (family Phlebotomidae).—363 pp. Jerusalem, Israel Programme for Scientific Translations. [Translated from Fauna SSSR N. S. no. 93, 384 pp. Moscow, Zool. Inst. Akad. Nauk SSSR. 1966.]Google Scholar
Ranque, J., Quilici, M. & Dunan, S. (1975). Les leishmanioses du sud-est de la France. Écologie.—épidémiologie—prophylaxie.—Acta Tropica 32, 371–380.Google Scholar
Ready, P. D. & Croset, H. (1977). Rearing methods for two sandfly species (Diptera: Phlebotomidae) from the “Midi,” France.—Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 71, 384.Google Scholar
Rioux, J. A., Croset, H., Gabinaud, A., Papierok, B. & Belmonte, A. (1973). Hérédité monofactorielle de ’autogenèse chez Aedes (Ochlerotatus) detritus (Haliday, 1833) (Diptera—Culicidae).—C. r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris, D 276, 991–994.Google Scholar
Rioux, J. A., Golvan, Y. J., Croset, H., Tour, S., Houin, R., Abonnenc, E., Petitdidier, M., Vollhardt, Y., Dedet, J. P., Albaret, J. L., Lanotte, G. & Quilici, M. (1969). Epidémiologie des leishmanioses dans le sud de la France.—223 pp. Monographie INSERM, no. 37, Paris.Google Scholar
Rioux, J. A..Killick-Kendrick, R., Leaney, A. J., Turner, D. P, Young, C. J. & Lanotte, G. (in press). The ecology of leishmaniasis in the south of France. Mark-release-recapture of Phlebotomus ariasi infected with Leishmania donovani: the biology of the fly and its role as a vector.—Annls Parasit. hum. comp.Google Scholar
Roubaud, E. (1927). L’hétérodynamie et le rôle de l’athermobiose dans le cycle évolutif de Phlebotomus papatasii.—Bull. Soc. Path. exot. 20, 613–619.Google Scholar
Roubaud, E. (1928 a). Longue durée de l’asthénobiose pseudo-hivernale chez Phlebotomus papatasii: action réactivante de l’athermobiose prolongée.—Bull. Soc. Path. exot. 21, 107–108.Google Scholar
Roubaud, E. (1928 b). Asthénobiose et hibernation obligatoire provoquées chez Phlebotomus papatasii Scop.—Bull. Soc. Path. exot 21, 436–439.Google Scholar
Roubaud, E. & Colas-Belcour, J. (1927). Recherches biologiques sur les phlébotomes de la Tunisie du nord.—Archs Inst. Pasteur Tunis 16, 59–80.Google Scholar
Saunders, D. S. (1976). Insect clocks.—279 pp. Oxford, Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Siegel, S. (1956). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences.—312 pp. New York, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Theodor, O. (1934). Observations on the hibernation of Phlebotomus papatasii (Dipt.).—Bull. ent. Res. 25, 459–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, R. D. & Killick-Kendrick, R. (1974). Field and laboratory observations on Psychodopygus lainsoni Fraiha & Ward and other sandflies (Diptera, Phlebotomidae) from the Transamazônica highway, Pará State, Brazil.—Bull. ent. Res. 64, 213–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittingham, H. E. & Rook, A. F. (1923). Observations on the life-history and bionomics of Phlebotomus papatasii.—Br. med. J. no. 3285, 1144–1151.Google Scholar