Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T09:48:46.747Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The development of Monoctonus paludum Marshall* (Hym., Braconidae) in Nasonovia ribis-nigri on lettuce, and immunity reactions in other Lettuce Aphids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

D. C. Griffiths
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Durham, King's College, Newcastle upon Tyne.

Extract

Aphids belonging to the species Nasonovia ribis-nigri (Mosley), Aulacorthum circumflexum (Buckt.), Macrosiphum euphorbiae (Thos.), Myzus persicae (Sulz.) and A. solani (Kalt.) were exposed to attack by the parasite, Monoctonus paludum Marshall, and were sectioned and dissected at various time-intervals after attack in order to observe the developmental processes of the parasite.

The egg was always laid in the posterior mass of fused ventral nerve ganglia in the thorax of the aphid host.

The development of the parasite in N. ribis-nigri, its normal host on lettuce, is described.

In the species A. circumflexum the development of the parasite was arrested after approximately 24 hours by the secretion around it of a thin brown capsule formed by certain of the host's blood cells.

In the other three species, Macrosiphum euphorbiae, Myzus persicae and A. solani, no capsule formation occurred. The development of the parasite embryos was rather variable in these but it was common for parasites in Macrosiphum euphorbiae to reach the stage normal for 24-hour embryos and for parasites in Myzus persicae and A. solani to reach stages rather less advanced than this before degenerative changes set in.

The degenerative changes in the parasite embryos are described for each species of aphid and the nature of these changes is discussed.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beirne, B.P. (1942). Observations on the developmental stages of some Aphidiinae (Hym., Braconidae).—Ent. mon. Mag. 78 pp. 283286.Google Scholar
Bess, H.A. (1939). Investigations on the resistance of mealybugs (Homoptera) to parasitization by internal Hymenopterous parasites, with special reference to phagocytosis.—Ann. ent. Soc. Amer. 32 pp. 189226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanders, S.E. (1934). The secretion of the colleterial glands in the parasitic Chalcids.—J. econ. Ent. 27 pp. 861862.Google Scholar
Griffiths, D.C. (1960). The behaviour and specificity of Monoctonus paludum Marshall (Hym., Braconidae), a parasite of Nasonovia ribis-nigri (Mosley) on lettuce.—Bull. ent. Res. 51 pp. 303319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollande, A.C. (1911). Etude histologique comparée du sang des insectes à hémorrhée et des insectes sans hémorrhées.—Arch. Zool. exp. gén. (5) 6 pp. 283323.Google Scholar
Jackson, D.J. (1935). Giant cells in insects parasitised by Hymenopterous larvae.—Nature, Lond. 135 pp. 10401041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchal, P. (1906). Recherches sur la biologie et le développement des Hyménoptères parasites. II. Les Platygasters.—Arch. Zool. exp. gén. (4) 4 pp. 485640.Google Scholar
Muldrew, J.A. (1953). The natural immunity of the larch sawfly (Pristophora erichsonii (Htg.)) to the introduced parasite Mesoleius tenthredinis Morley, in Manitoba and Saskatchewan.—Canad. J. Zool. 31 pp. 313332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pantin, C. F. A. (1946). Notes on microscopical technique for zoologists.—75 pp. Cambridge, Univ. Pr.Google Scholar
Salt, G. (1955). Experimental studies in insect parasitism. VIII. Host reactions following artificial parasitization.—Proa, roy, Soc. (B) 144 pp. 380398.Google ScholarPubMed
Salt, G. (1956). Experimental studies in insect parasitism. IX. The reactions of a stick insect to an alien parasite.—Proc. roy. Soc. (B) 146 pp. 93108.Google Scholar
Salt, G. (1957). Experimental studies in insect parasitism. X. The reactions of some endopterygote insects to an alien parasite.—Proc. roy. Soc. (B) 147 pp. 167184.Google Scholar
Schneider, F. (1950). Die Abwehrreaktion des Insektenblutes und ihre Beeinflussung durch die Parasiten.—Vjschr. naturf. Ges. Zürich 95 pp. 2244.Google Scholar
Spencer, H. (1926). Biology of the parasites and hyperparasites of aphids.—Ann. ent. Soc. Ainer. 19 pp. 119157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starý, P. (1959). A revision of the European species of the genus Monoctonus Haliday.—Ada. Soc. ent. Čsl. 56 pp. 237250.Google Scholar
Strickland, E. H. (1930). Phagocytosis of internal insect parasites.—Nature, Land. 126 p. 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar