Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:12:00.556Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cyclodiene-BHC resistance in Cosmopolites sordidus (Germ.) (Coleoptera, Curculionidae) in New South Wales, Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

V. E. Edge
Affiliation:
Biological and Chemical Research Institute, New South Wales Department of Agriculture, P.M.B. 10, Rydalmere, N.S.W. 2116, Australia

Abstract

Dieldrin, aldrin and γBHC in kerosene were applied topically to adults of Cosmopolites sordidus (Germ.) collected from banana plantations with no history of insecticide application and from plantations that had been treated regularly with dieldrin for many years. Adults from the latter source were highly resistant to dieldrin and aldrin, while resistance to γBHC was lower; those from the former source were susceptible and the results could be used as base line data. Females collected in spring from two untreated plantations showed LD50 values for dieldrin varying by a factor of 1·5, while females collected in the spring were 1·7 times more susceptible than those collected in the autumn from the same plantation. A discriminating dose of 1 μl of 1·0% dieldrin per weevil is considered suitable for detecting resistant individuals.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, W. S. (1925). A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide.—J. econ. Ent. 18, 265267.Google Scholar
Anon. (1969). Beetle borer studies.—Banana Bull. 33 (7), 4.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, B. M. (1958). Ground spray treatments for control of banana beetle borer (Cosmopolites sordidus Germ.).—J. Aust. Inst. agric. Sci. 24, 2734.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, B. M. (1963). The banana beetle borer Cosmopolites sordidus Germ.—Agric. Gaz. N.S.W. 74, 396399, 419.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, B. M. (1967). Banana beetle borer control investigations on the north coast of New South Wales.—Agric. Gaz. N.S.W. 78, 359365.Google Scholar
Brown, A. W. A. (1969). Insect resistance. Part 1—Nature and prevalence of resistance.—Farm. Chem. 132, 5068.Google Scholar
Busvine, J. R. & Shanahan, G. J. (1961). The resistance spectrum of a dieldrin-resistant strain of the blowfly (Lucilia cuprina Wied.).—Entomologia exp. appl. 4, 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feakin, S. D. (Ed.) (1971). Pest control in bananas.—2nd edn, 128 pp. London, PANS. [Foreign and Commonwealth Office, Overseas Development Administration]. (PANS Manual no. 1).Google Scholar
Finney, D. J. (1952). Probit analysis. A statistical treatment of the sigmoid response curve.—2nd edn, 318 pp. London, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guyot, H. & Cuillé, J. (1956). L'utilisation des atomiseurs à débit réduit pour les traitments du sol. La lutte contre le charançon du bananier (Cosmopolites sordidus, Germ.) aux Antilles françaises.—Fruits d'outre mer 11, 249253.Google Scholar
Keiding, J. (1967). Persistence of resistant populations after the relaxation of the selection pressure.—Wld Rev. Pest Contr. 6, 115130.Google Scholar
McCarthy, T. (1920). Banana root borer (Cosmopolites sordidus Germar).—Agric. Gaz. N.S.W. 31, 865872.Google Scholar
Simmonds, N. W. & Simmonds, F. J. (1953). Experiments on the banana borer, Cosmopolites sordidus, in Trinidad, B.W.I.Trop. Agric., Trin. 30, 216223.Google Scholar
Vilardebo, A. (1967). Resistance of the banana tree weevil, Cosmopolites sordidus Germ. (Col., Calandridae) to chlorinated hydrocarbon insecticides.—Int. Congr. Pl. Prot., 586.Google Scholar
Vilardebo, A. (1969). Le charançon du bananier. I—Aspects du problème.—11 pp. Paris, Institut Français de Recherches Fruitières Outre-Mer. (Document IFAC no. 124).Google Scholar
World Health Organization (1963). Thirteenth report of the WHO Expert Committee on Insecticides.—Tech. Rep. Ser. Wld Hlth Org. no. 265, 227 pp.Google Scholar