Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:19:48.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Control of oriental fruit moth (Cydia molesta (Busck) (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae)) with synthetic female pheromone

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

G. H. L. Rothschild
Affiliation:
Division of Entomology, CSIRO, P.O. Box 1700, Canberra City, ACT 2601, Australia

Abstract

Field trials were undertaken in Victoria and New South Wales, Australia, to discover whether synthetic sex pheromone, cis-8-dodecenyl acetate, could be used to control the oriental fruit moth, Cydia molesta (Busck), in peach orchards by the disruption technique. When pheromone was released at rates exceeding 5 mg/ha h from polyethylene capillary tubes males were generally unable to locate synthetic pheromone sources or live virgin females. By maintaining a constant rate of release per unit area it was possible to reduce the number of dispensers from one per 50 m2 to one per 400 m2. There was no significant difference in disruption when pheromone was released from tree crowns at 3·5 m or lower down at 1·5 m. Shoot and fruit damage from trials in commercial orchards suggested that pheromone treatments were as effective as a full seasonal schedule of insecticide applications in reducing damage.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beroza, M., Gentry, C. R., Blythe, J. L. & Muschik, G. M. (1973). Isomer content and other factors influencing captures of oriental fruit moth by synthetic pheromone traps.—J. econ. Ent. 66, 13071311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birch, M., Trammel, K., Shorey, H. H., Gaston, L. K., Cameron, E. A. & Saunders, C. J. (1974). Programmes utilising pheromones in survey or control. In Birch, M. (Ed.) Pheromones.—pp. 411441. Amsterdam, North Holland.Google Scholar
Cameron, E. A., Schwalbe, C. P., Beroza, M. & Knipling, E. F. (1974). Disruption of gypsy moth mating by microencapsulated Disparlure.—Science, N.Y. 183, 972973.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chisholm, R. D., Yetter, W. P. Jr. & Brunson, M. H. (1946). Baits for oriental fruit moth.—J. econ. Ent. 39, 399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dustan, G. G. (1964). Mating behaviour of the oriental fruit moth, Grapholitha molesta (Busck) (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae).—Can. Ent. 96, 10871093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentry, C. R., Beroza, M., Blythe, J. L. & Bierl, B. A. (1974). Efficacy trials with the pheromone of the oriental fruit moth and data on the lesser appleworm.—J. econ. Ent. 67, 607609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glass, E. H., Roelofs, W. L., Arn, H. & Comeau, A. (1970). Sex pheromone trapping red-banded leaf roller moths and development of a long-lasting polyethylene wick.—J. econ. Ent. 63, 370373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, J. R., Shorey, H. H., Gaston, L. K., Kaae, R. S. & Stewart, F. D. (1972). Sex pheromones of Lepidoptera. XXXI. Disruption of sex pheromone communication in Pectinophora gossypiella with Hexalure.—Environ. Entomol. 1, 645650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nel, R. I. (1940). The validity of the bait-trap method of spray timing in codling moth control.—Entomology Mem. Dep. Agric. For. Un. S. Afr. 2, 5576.Google Scholar
Phillips, J. H. H. (1973). Monitoring for oriental fruit moth with synthetic sex pheromone.—Environ. Entomol. 2, 10391042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, J. H. H. & Prcotor, J. R. (1970). Development of methods for sampling the oriental fruit moth, Grapholitha molesta (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), in an Ontario peach orchard.—Can. Ent. 102, 454471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riedl, H. & Croft, B. A. (1974). A study of pheromone trap catches in relation to codling moth (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae) damage.—Can. Ent. 106, 525537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roehrich, R. (1961). Contribution à l'étude ecologique des populations de la tordeuse du pêcher (Grapholitha molesta Busck) dans la région Aquitaine.—Annls Epiphyt. numèro Hors Série, 114 pp.Google Scholar
Roelofs, W. L., CardÉ, R. T. & Tette, J. P. (1973). Oriental fruit moth attractant synergists.—Environ. Entomol. 2, 252254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roelofs, W. L., Comeau, A. & Selle, R. (1969). Sex pheromone of the oriental fruit moth.—Nature, Lond. 224, 723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothschild, G. H. L. (1974). Problems in defining synergists and inhibitors of the oriental fruit moth pheromone by field experimentation.—Entomologia exp. appl. 17, 294302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothschild, G. H. L. & Minks, A. K. (1974). Time of activity of male oriental fruit moths at pheromone sources in the field.—Environ. Entomol. 3, 10031007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shorey, H. H., Gaston, L. K. & Saario, C. A. (1967). Sex pheromones of noctuid moths. XIV. Feasibility of behavioural control by disrupting pheromone communication in cabbage loopers.—J. econ. Ent. 60, 15411545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shorey, H. H.Kaae, R. S., Gaston, L. K. & McLaughlin, J. R. (1972). Sex pheromones in Lepidoptera. XXX. Disruption of sex pheromone communication in Trichoplusiani as a possible means of mating control.—Environ. Entomol. 1, 641645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taschenberg, E. F., CardÉ, R. T. & Roelofs, W. L. (1974). Sex pheromone mass trapping and mating disruption for control of redband leafroller and grape berry moths in vineyards.—Environ. Entomol. 3, 239242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tette, J. P. (1974). Pheromones in insect population management. In Birch, M. (Ed.) Pheromones.—pp. 401410. Amsterdam, North Holland.Google Scholar
Trammel, K., Roelofs, W. L. & Glass, E. H. (1974). Sex-pheromone trapping of males for control of redbanded leafroller in apple orchards.—J. econ. Ent. 67, 159164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar