Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:21:28.204Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The control of migratory urge in aphis fabae scopoli (hemiptera: aphididae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

N. A. C. Kidd
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University College, Cardiff, Wales, UK
A. M. Cleaver
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University College, Cardiff, Wales, UK

Abstract

Some flightworthy alate exules of Aphis fabae Scopoli reproduce before taking off while others do not. This difference in behaviour is influenced by crowding and has previously been taken as an indication of the urge to migrate, although it has never been conclusively demonstrated. In this study, the flight performance of those aphids depositing some nymphs before take-off (‘flyers’) was compared with those which did not (‘migrants’). In fact, no significant difference was found between migrants and flyers in any of the aspects of post-take-off flight or settling behaviour tested. In tethered flight, large alatae flew for longer than small ones, irrespective of their pre-flight reproductive behaviour. In free flight, however, large alatae flew for a shorter period before actively landing on a plant. Large alatae were also subsequently more reluctant to leave the plant than small alatae, spending more time in sedentary activities such as probing and less time preparing to take off. It is concluded, therefore, that migratory urge is related more to aphid size, a product of plant nutritive quality, than to take-off urge, as measured by pre-flight reproductive behaviour. However, as high population densities tend to occur when the nutritional quality of the host is declining, take-off urge and migratory urge are likely to be synchronized in the field.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cockbain, A. J. (1961 a). Fuel utilization and duration of tethered flight in Aphis fabae Scop.—J. exp. Biol. 38, 163174.Google Scholar
Cockbain, A. J. (1961 b). Water relationships of Aphis fabae Scop. during tethered flight.—J. exp. Biol. 38, 175180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cockbain, A. J. (1961 c). Viability and fecundity of alate alienicolae of Aphis fabae Scop. after flights to exhaustion.—J. exp. Biol. 38, 181187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, A. F. G. (1969). Population dynamics of the sycamore aphid, Drepanosiphum platanoides (Schr.) (Hemiptera: Aphididae): migratory and trivial flight activity.—J. Anim. Ecol. 38, 585606.Google Scholar
Dixon, A. F. G. (1971 a). The role of intra-specific mechanisms and predation in regulating the numbers of the lime aphid, Eucallipterus tiliae L.Oecologia 8, 179193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dixon, A. F. G. (1971 b). Migration in aphids.—Sci. Prog., Lond. 59, 4153.Google ScholarPubMed
Dixon, A. F. G. (1985 a). Structure of aphid populations.—A. Rev. Ent. 30, 155174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, A. F. G. (1985 b). Aphid ecology.—157 pp. Glasgow, Blackie.Google Scholar
Dixon, A. F. G., Burns, M. D. & Wangboonkong, S. (1968). Migration in aphids: response to current adversity.—Nature, Lond. 220, 13371338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dixon, A. F. G., Chambers, R. J. & Dharma, T. R. (1982). Factors affecting size in aphids with particular reference to the black bean aphid, Aphis fabae.—Entomologia exp. appl. 32, 123128.Google Scholar
Dixon, A. F. G. & Dharma, T. R. (1980). Number of ovarioles and fecundity in the black bean aphid, Aphis fabae.—Entomologia exp. appl. 28, 114.Google Scholar
Haine, E. (1955). The flight activity of the sycamore aphid, Drepanosiphum platanoides Schr. (Hemiptera, Aphididae).—J. Anim. Ecol. 24, 388394.Google Scholar
Ibbotson, A. & Kennedy, J. S. (1959). Interaction between walking and probing in Aphis fabae Scop.—J. exp. Biol. 36, 377390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, B. (1957). Studies on the degeneration of the flight muscles of alate aphids—I. A comparative study of the occurrence of muscle breakdown in relation to reproduction in several species.—J. Insect Physiol. 1, 248256.Google Scholar
Johnson, B. (1958). Factors affecting the locomotor and settling responses of alate aphids.—Anim. Behav. 6, 926.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. G. (1969). Migration and dispersal of insects by flight.—763 pp. London, Methuen.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. G. (1976). Lability of the flight system: a context for functional adaptation.—pp. 217–234 in Rainey, R. C. (Ed.). Insect flight.—287 pp. London, Blackwell (Symp. R. ent. Soc. Lond. no. 7).Google Scholar
Kennedy, J. S. (1961). A turning point in the study of insect migration.—Nature, Lond. 189, 785791.Google Scholar
Kennedy, J. S. & Booth, C. O. (1963 a). Free flight of aphids in the laboratory.—J. exp. Biol. 40, 6785.Google Scholar
Kennedy, J. S. & Booth, C. O. (1963 b). Co-ordination of successive activities in an aphid. The effect of flight on the settling responses.—J. exp. Biol. 40, 351369.Google Scholar
Kennedy, J. S. & Ludlow, A. R. (1974). Co-ordination of two kinds of flight activity in an aphid.—J. exp. Biol. 61, 173196.Google Scholar
Kidd, N. A. C. (1977). The influence of population density on the flight behaviour of the lime aphid, Eucallipterus tiliae.—Entomologia exp. appl. 22, 251261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidd, N. A. C. & Cleaver, A. M. (1984). The relationship between pre-flight reproduction and migratory urge in alatae of Aphis fabae Scopoli (Hemiptera: Aphididae).—Bull. ent. Res. 74, 517527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lees, A. D. (1966). The control of polymorphism in aphids.—Adv. Insect Physiol. 3, 207277.Google Scholar
Murdie, G. (1969). Some causes of size variation in the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum Harris.—Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 121, 423442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaefers, G. A. (1972). The role of nutrition in alary polymorphism among the Aphididae—an overview.—Search Agriculture 2 (4), 8 pp.Google Scholar
Shaw, M. J. P. (1970 a). Effects of population density on alienicolae of Aphis fabae Scop. I. The effect of crowding on the production of alatae in the laboratory.—Ann. appl. Biol. 65, 191196.Google Scholar
Shaw, M. J. P. (1970 b). Effects of population density on alienicolae of Aphis fabae Scop. II. The effects of crowding on the expression of migratory urge among alatae in the laboratory.—Ann. appl. Biol. 65, 197203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, M. J. P. (1973). Effects of population density on alienicolae of Aphis fabae Scop. V. Variations in size, relative wing length and numbers of antennal sensoria of field alatae.—Ann. appl. Biol. 74, 916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southwood, T. R. E. (1962). Migration of terrestrial arthropods in relation to habitat.—Biol. Rev. 37, 171214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutherland, O. R. W. (1969). The role of crowding in the production of winged forms by two strains of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum.—J. Insect Physiol. 15, 13851410.Google Scholar
Taylor, L. R. (1958). Aphid dispersal and diurnal periodicity.—Proc. Linn. Soc. Lond. 169, 6773.Google Scholar
Toba, H. H., Paschke, J. D. & Friedman, S. (1967). Crowding as the primary factor in the production of the agamic alate form of Therioaphis maculata (Homoptera: Aphididae).—J. Insect Physiol. 13, 381396.Google Scholar
Tsitsipis, J. A. & Mittler, T. E. (1976). Embryogenesis in parthenogenetic and sexual females of Aphis fabae.—Entomologia exp. appl. 19, 263270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walters, K. F. A. & Dixon, A. F. G. (1983). Migratory urge and reproductive investment in aphids: variation within clones.—Oecologia 58, 7075.Google Scholar
Wiktelius, S. (1982). Flight and settling behaviour of Rhopalosiphum padi (L.) (Hemiptera: Aphididae).—Bull. ent. Res. 72, 157163.Google Scholar