Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:12:07.686Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Competitiveness of chemosterilised males and cytoplasmically incompatible translocated males of Culex pipiens fatigans wiedemann (Diptera, Culicidae) in the field

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

K. K. Grover ,
C. F. Curtis ,
V. P. Sharma ,
K. R. P. Singh ,
K. Dietz ,
H. V. Agarwal ,
R. K. Razdan  and
V. Vaidyanathan
K. K. Grover
Affiliation:
WHO/ICMR Research Unit on Genetic Control of Mosquitos, New Delhi, India
C. F. Curtis
Affiliation:
WHO/ICMR Research Unit on Genetic Control of Mosquitos, New Delhi, India
V. P. Sharma
Affiliation:
WHO/ICMR Research Unit on Genetic Control of Mosquitos, New Delhi, India
K. R. P. Singh
Affiliation:
WHO/ICMR Research Unit on Genetic Control of Mosquitos, New Delhi, India
K. Dietz
Affiliation:
WHO/ICMR Research Unit on Genetic Control of Mosquitos, New Delhi, India
H. V. Agarwal
Affiliation:
WHO/ICMR Research Unit on Genetic Control of Mosquitos, New Delhi, India
R. K. Razdan
Affiliation:
WHO/ICMR Research Unit on Genetic Control of Mosquitos, New Delhi, India
V. Vaidyanathan
Affiliation:
WHO/ICMR Research Unit on Genetic Control of Mosquitos, New Delhi, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A technique, based on the release and recapture of marked females, was used to measure the mating competitiveness of sterile males of Culex pipiens fatigans Wied. in villages in Delhi Union Territory, India. Experiments were carried out with chemosterilised and cytoplasmically incompatible translocated (IS-31B) males simultaneously with prolonged release trials with these two types of male. The fertile males in the tests were the indigenous population and the females used were in most cases of wild origin. With each type of male, one test was conducted with a moderate (ca. 13:1) ratio of released to wild males and the other tests used high (ca. 40:1) ratios. The estimated mean mating competitiveness of IS-31B males was somewhat higher than that of chemosterilised males, but the difference was found to be non-significant using a specially devised method of testing statistical significance. In the four experiments 77–94% of the egg rafts laid by recaptured females were sterile, indicating that both types of sterile male were sufficiently competitive to induce a high level of egg sterility in an isolated wild population.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 66 , Issue 3 , September 1976 , pp. 469 - 480
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berryman, A. A. (1967). Mathematical description of the sterile male principle.—Can. Ent., 99, 858–865.Google Scholar
Dame, D. A., Woodard, D. B., Ford, H. R. & Weidhaas, D. E. (1964). Field behavior of sexually sterile Anopheles quadrimaculatus males.—Mosquito News 24, 6–14.Google Scholar
Fried, M. (1971). Determination of sterile-insect competitiveness.—J. econ. Ent. 64, 869–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, L. A. (1964). Simple methods for analyzing three factor interaction in contingency tables.—J. Am. Statist. Ass. 59, 319–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grover, K. K. & Sharma, V. P. (1974). The present status of the work on induced sterility mechanisms for control of mosquitoes Culex pipiens fatigans Wied. and Aedes aegypti (L.) at the WHO/ICMR Research Unit on Genetic Control of Mosquitoes.—J. Com. Dis. 6, 91–97.Google Scholar
Haisch, A. (1970). Some observations on decreased vitality of irradiated Mediterranean fruit fly. In Sterile-male technique for control of fruit flies. Proceedings of a panel on the application of the sterile-male technique for control of insects with special reference to fruit flies. Organised by the Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Atomic Energy in food and Agriculture and held in Vienna, 1–5 September 1969. 71–75. Vienna, International Atomic Energy Agency.Google Scholar
Krishnamurthy, B. S. & Laven, H. (1974). Development of cytoplasmically incompatible and integrated (translocated incompatible) strains of Culex pipiens/fatigans for use in genetic control.—WHO/VBC/74.496 (Mimeographed document).Google Scholar
Krishnamurthy, B. S., Ray, S. N. & Joshi, G. C. (1962). A note on preliminary field studies of the use of irradiated males for reduction of C. fatigans Wied. populations.—Indian J. Malar. 16, 365–373.Google Scholar
Lowe, R. E., Ford, H. R., Cameron, A. L., Smittle, B. J., Dame, D. A., Patterson, R. S. & Weidhaas, D. E. (1974). Competitiveness of sterile male Culex pipiens quinque-fasciatus Say released into a natural population.—Mosquito News 34, 447–453.Google Scholar
Pal, R. (1974). WHO/ICMR programme of genetic control of mosquitos in India.—In Pal, R. & Whitten, M. J. (Eds). The use of genetics in insect control.—73–95. Amsterdam, Elsevier/North Holland.Google Scholar
Petit, C. & Ehrman, L. (1969). Sexual selection in Drosophila.—Evol. Biol. 3, 177–223.Google Scholar
Rao, T. R. (1974). Research on genetic control of mosquitoes in India: Review of the work of the WHO/ICMR Research Unit, New Delhi.—J. Com. Dis. 6, 57–72.Google Scholar
Sharma, V. P., Patterson, R. S. & Ford, H. R. (1972). A device for the rapid separation of male and female mosquito pupae.—Bull. Wld Hlth Org. 47, 429–432.Google Scholar
Sharma, V. P., Patterson, R. S., Grover, K. K. & LaBrecque, G. C. (1973). Chemo-sterilization of the tropical house mosquito Culex pipiens fatigens Wied.: laboratory and field cage studies.—Bull. Wld Hlth Org. 48, 45–48.Google Scholar
Singh, K. R. P., Patterson, R. S., LaBrecque, G. C. & Razdan, R. K. (1975 a). Mass rearing of Culex pipiens fatigans Wied.—J. Com. Dis. 7, 31–53.Google Scholar
Singh, K. R. P., Razdan, R. K., Vaidyanathan, V. & Malhotra, P. R. (1975 b). Caging, marking and transportation of Culex pipiens fatigans Wied. for large scale genetic control operations.—J. Com. Dis. 7, 269–279.Google Scholar
Woodard, D. B., Weidhaas, D. E. & Ford, H. R. (1962). A method to study mating activity of Anopheles quadrimaculatus Say under field conditions.—Proc. Fla. Anti Mosq. Ass. 33, 24 (Abstract).Google Scholar
Yasuno, M., Kazmi, S. J., LaBrecque, G. C. & Rajagopalan, P. K. (1973). Seasonal changes in larval habitats and population density of Culex fatigans in Delhi villages.—WHO/VBC/73.429 (Mimeographed document).Google Scholar
Yasuno, M., Macdonald, W. W., Curtis, C. F., Grover, K. K., Rajagopalan, P. K., Sharma, L. S., Sharma, V. P., Singh, D., Singh, K. R. P., Agarwal, H. V., Das, S., Kazmi, S. J., Menon, P. K. B., Menon, R., Razdan, R. K. & Vaidyanathan, V. (1976). A release experiment with chemosterilized male Culex pipiens fatigans Wied. in a village surrounded by a breeding-free zone.—Indian J. med. Res. (in press).Google Scholar
Yasuno, M., Singh, N. & Chowdhury, D. S. (1972). Field studies on the mating behaviour of Culex fatigans.— WHO/VBC/72.390 (Mimeographed document).Google Scholar