Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T14:48:24.169Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparing the Efficiency of Insect Traps

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

C. B. Williams
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden.

Extract

An experiment is described in which three light traps were tested for relative efficiency by having three locations in a wood and moving the traps each day so that over a period of three nights each trap had been once in each position. The actual number of moths caught were converted to a logarithmic scale and the mean log. (i.e., log. of the geometric mean catch) was used for comparison. By analysis of variance it is possible to show what portion of the differences between the catches is due to the difference between the locations, to the difference between the nights, and the difference between the traps.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1951

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

French, R. A. (1951). Lepidoptera at light in a Hertfordshire wood in July, 1949.—Entomologist, 84, pp. 4955.Google Scholar
Robinson, H. S. & Robinson, P. J. M. (1950). Some notes on the observed behaviour of Lepidoptera in flight in the vicinity of light-sources together with a description of a light-trap designed to take entomological samples.—Ent. Gaz., 1, pp. 320.Google Scholar
Williams, C. B. (1937). The use of logarithms in the interpretation of certain entomological problems.—Ann. appi. Biol., 24, pp. 404414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, C. B. (1940). An analysis of four years captures of insects in a light trap. Part II.—Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond., 90, pp. 227306.Google Scholar
Williams, C. B. (1948). The Rothamsted light trap.—Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond., (A) 23, pp. 8085.Google Scholar