Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T06:19:40.072Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparative life tables of leek moth, Acrolepiopsis assectella (Zeller) (Lepidoptera: Acrolepiidae), in its native range

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

W.H. Jenner ,
U. Kuhlmann ,
P.G. Mason  and
N. Cappuccino
W.H. Jenner*
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, ON, K1S 5B6, Canada
U. Kuhlmann
Affiliation:
CABI Europe - Switzerland, 1 Rue des Grillons, Delémont, CH-2800, Switzerland
P.G. Mason
Affiliation:
Eastern Cereal and Oilseed Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 960 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, ON, K1A 0C6
N. Cappuccino
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, ON, K1S 5B6, Canada
*
*Author for correspondence Fax: +41-32-421-4871 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Leek moth, Acrolepiopsis assectella (Zeller) (Lepidoptera: Acrolepiidae), is an invasive alien species in eastern Canada, the larvae of which mine the green tissues of Allium spp. This study was designed to construct and analyse life tables for leek moth within its native range. Stage-specific mortality rates were estimated for the third leek moth generation at three sites in Switzerland from 2004 to 2006 to identify some of the principle factors that inhibit leek moth population growth in areas of low pest density. The contribution of natural enemies to leek moth mortality was measured by comparing mortality on caged and uncaged leeks. Total pre-imaginal mortality on uncaged plants was 99.6%, 99.1% and 96.4% in 2004, 2005 and 2006, respectively. Variation in mortality was greater among years than among sites. Total larval mortality was greater than that in the eggs and pupae. This was due largely to the high mortality (up to 83.3%) of neonates during the brief period between egg hatch and establishment of the feeding mine. Leek moth pupal mortality was significantly greater on uncaged than on caged leeks, indicating an impact by natural enemies, and this pattern was consistent over all three years of study. In contrast, the other life stages did not show consistently higher mortality rates on uncaged plants. This observation suggests that the pupal stage may be particularly vulnerable to natural enemies and, therefore, may be the best target for classical biological control in Canada.

Keywords

Acrolepiopsis assectellaexclusionfecunditykey factorlife tablestage-specific mortalitynatural enemy impact
Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 100 , Issue 1 , February 2010 , pp. 87 - 97
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, J., Jenner, W., Cappuccino, N. & Mason, P.G. (2007) Oviposition and feeding preference of Acrolepiopsis assectella Zell. (Lep., Acrolepiidae). Journal of Applied Entomology 131, 690–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auerbach, M.J., Connor, E.F. & Mopper, S. (1995) Minor miners and major minors: population dynamics of leaf-mining insects. pp. 83–110 in Cappuccino, N. & Price, P.W. (Eds) Population Dynamics: New Approaches and Synthesis. San Diego, CA, Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barron, M.C., Barlow, N.D. & Wratten, S.D. (2003) Non-target parasitism of the endemic New Zealand red admiral butterfly (Bassaris gonerilla) by the introduced biological control agent Pteromalus puparum. Biological Control 27, 329–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellows, T.S. Jr., Van Driesche, R.G. & Elkinton, J.S. (1992) Life-table construction and analysis in the evaluation of natural enemies. Annual Review of Entomology 37, 587–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cappuccino, N. (1991) Mortality of Microrhopala vittata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in outbreak and nonoutbreak sites. Environmental Entomology 20, 865–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, J.R. (2001) Insect biodemography. Annual Review of Entomology 46, 79–110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cornell, H.V. & Hawkins, B.A. (1995) Survival patterns and mortality sources of herbivorous insects: some demographic trends. The American Naturalist 145, 563–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornell, H.V. & Pimentel, D. (1978) Switching in the parasitoid Nasonia vitripennis and its effects on host competition. Ecology 59, 297–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornell, H.V., Hawkins, B.A. & Hochberg, M.E. (1998) Towards an empirically-based theory of herbivore demography. Ecological Entomology 23, 340–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debach, P. & Rosen, D. (1991) Biological Control by Natural Enemies. 465Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Duan, J.J., Messing, R.H. & Dukas, R. (2000) Host selection of Diachasmimorpha tryoni (Hymenoptera: Braconidae): comparative response to fruit-infesting and gall-forming tephritid flies. Environmental Entomology 29, 838–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elkinton, J.S., Buonaccorsi, J.P., Bellows, T.S. Jr. & Van Driesche, R.G. (1992) Marginal attack rate, k-values and density dependence in the analysis of contemporaneous mortality factors. Researches on Population Ecology 34, 29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elton, C.S. (1958) The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants. 181London, Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floater, G.J. & Zalucki, M.P. (1999) Life tables of the processionary caterpillar Ochrogaster lunifer Herrich-Schäffer (Lepidoptera: Thaumetopoeidae) at local and regional scales. Australian Journal of Entomology 38, 330–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frediani, D. (1954) Ricerche morfo-biologiche sull'Acrolepia assectella Zell. (Lep. Plutellidae) nell'Italia centrale. Redia 39, 187–249.Google Scholar
Furlong, M.J., Shi, Z., Liu, S. & Zalucki, M.P. (2004) Evaluation of the impact of natural enemies on Plutella xylostella L. (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae) populations on commercial brassica farms. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 6, 311–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girardoz, S., Tomov, R., Eschen, R., Quicke, D.L.J. & Kenis, M. (2007) Two methods of assessing the mortality factors affecting the larvae and pupae of Cameraria ohridella in the leaves of Aesculus hippocastanum in Switzerland and Bulgaria. Bulletin of Entomological Research 97, 445–453.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harcourt, D.G. (1969) The development and use of life tables in the study of natural insect populations. Annual Review of Entomology 12, 175–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jary, S.G. & Rolfe, S.W. (1945) The leek moth. Agriculture 52, 35–37.Google Scholar
Jenner, W.H. (2008). Evaluation of a candidate classical biological control agent and critical assessment of suggested host specificity testing guidelines. PhD thesis, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada.Google Scholar
Jenner, W.H. & Kuhlmann, U. (2005) Biological control of leek moth, Acrolepiopsis assectella. Annual Report 2004/2005. 13Delémont, CABI Europe – Switzerland.Google Scholar
Kuhlmann, U., Carl, K.P. & Mills, N.J. (1998) Quantifying the impact of insect predators and parasitoids on populations of the apple ermine moth, Ypnomeuta malinellus (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae), in Europe. Bulletin of Entomological Research 88, 165–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kyi, A., Zalucki, M.P. & Titmarsh, I.J. (1991) An experimental study of early stage survival of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on cotton. Bulletin of Entomological Research 81, 263–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labeyrie, V. (1966) Sous-famille des Acrolepiinae. pp. 233–249in Balachowsky, A.S. (Ed.). Entomologie Appliquée à l'Agriculture. Tome II, Lépidoptères, Vol. 1. Paris, Masson et Cie.Google Scholar
Landry, J.-F. (2007) Taxonomic review of the leek moth genus Acrolepiopsis (Lepidoptera: Acrolepiidae) in North America. Canadian Entomologist 139, 319–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, D.A. (1988) Factors affecting mortality of the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis (Hubner), in Alberta. Canadian Entomologist 120, 841–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luck, R.L., Shepard, B.M. & Kenmore, P.E. (1988) Experimental methods for evaluating arthropod natural enemies. Annual Review of Entomology 33, 367–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markula, M. (1981) Pests of cultivated plants in Finland in 1980. Annales Agriculturae Fenniae 20, 25–27.Google Scholar
Martin, J.L. (1956) The bionomics of the Aspen Blotch Miner, Lithocolletis salicifoliella Cham. (Lepidoptera: Gracillaridae). Canadian Entomologist 88, 155–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, P.G., Appleby, M., Callow, K., Allen, J., Fraser, H. & Landry, J.-F. (2006) Leek moth Acrolepiopsis assectella (Lepidoptera: Acrolepiidae) a pest of Allium spp.: biology and minor use insecticide registration. Final Project Report to ‘Improving Farming Systems Program’, AAFC Pest Management Centre (15 May 2006).Google Scholar
Morris, R.F. (1955) The development of sampling techniques for forest insect defoliators, with particular reference to the spruce budworm. Canadian Journal of Zoology 33, 225–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, R.F. (1959) Single-factor analysis in population dynamics. Ecology 40, 580–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naranjo, S.E. & Ellsworth, P.C. (2005) Mortality dynamics and population regulation in Bemisia tabaci. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 116, 93–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noyes, J.S. (1974) The biology of the leek moth, Acrolepia assectella (Zeller). PhD thesis, University of London, London, UK.Google Scholar
Nyrop, J.P., Shelton, A.M. & Theunissen, J. (1989) Value of a control decision for leek moth infestations in leek. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 53, 167–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereira, E.J.G., Picanço, M.C., Bacci, L., Crespo, A.L.B. & Guedes, R.N.C. (2007) Seasonal mortality factors of the coffee leafminer, Leucoptera coffeella. Bulletin of Entomological Research 97, 421–432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plaskota, E. & Dabrowski, Z.T. (1986) Biological principles of leek moth (Acrolepiopsis assectella Zeller, Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) control. I. Host plants, damage caused by leek moth larvae, and leek moth parasites. Annals of Warsaw Agricultural University 13, 27–34.Google Scholar
Podoler, H. & Rogers, D. (1975) A new method for the identification of key factors from life-table data. Journal of Animal Ecology 44, 85–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, P.W. (1975) Insect Ecology 514 pp. New York, John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Rausher, M.D. (1979) Larval habitat suitability and oviposition preference in three related butterflies. Ecology 60, 503–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SPSS Inc. (2005) SPSS Base 14.0 User's Guide. Chicago, SPSS Inc.Google Scholar
Thibout, E. & Nowbahari, B. (1987) La selection du lieu de nymphose chez la teigne du poireau, Acrolepiopsis assectella (Lep.): déterminisme exogène et variations interpopulations. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France 23, 183–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toepfer, S. & Kuhlmann, U. (2006) Constructing life-tables for the invasive maize pest Diabrotica vergifera vergifera (Col.; Chrysomelidae) in Europe. Journal of Applied Entomology 130, 193–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Driesche, R.G. & Bellows, T.S. Jr. (1996) Biological Control. 560New York, Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varley, G.C. & Gradwell, G.R. (1960) Key factors in population studies. Journal of Animal Ecology 29, 399–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velitchkevitch, A.I. (1924) Biological observations on A. assectella, Zell. in the Novgorod government [abstract]. Review of Applied Entomology 12, 356.Google Scholar
Zalucki, M.P., Clarke, A.R. & Malcolm, S.B. (2002) Ecology and behaviour of first instar larval Lepidoptera. Annual Review of Entomology 47, 361–393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed