Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:37:08.102Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Changes in the female reproductive system as age indicators in the bushfly Musca vetustissima Wlk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Marina Tyndale-Biscoe  and
R. D. Hughes
Marina Tyndale-Biscoe
Affiliation:
CSIRO, Division of Entomology, Canberra, Australia
R. D. Hughes
Affiliation:
CSIRO, Division of Entomology, Canberra, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Female Musca vetustissima Wlk. may be allocated to one of seventeen classes of development between emergence and the start of the fourth ovarian cycle, the criteria being the amount of pupal fat body, but chiefly the presence and size of the follicular relics (yellow bodies and beads in the ovaries) during successive ovarian cycles. The duration of these cycles was estimated under standard and differing environmental conditions. Withholding protein for up to two weeks merely delayed the first ovarian cycle, but longer deprivation caused reduced fertility. The initial phase of the first ovarian cycle was independent of protein feeding, but a protein feed was necessary to complete the cycle, and a further protein feed was needed to complete the second ovarian cycle. No development in the first cycle took place below 57°F, but between 58 and 78°F development was progressively faster. Unfertilised females developed and laid the first batch of eggs, but were unable to complete a second batch. Oviposition was delayed by lack of favourable sites, and after one week fertility was progressively reduced. It is shown that, because of these variables, valid estimates can be made only of the minimum age of female bushflies.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 59 , Issue 1 , July 1969 , pp. 129 - 141
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, J. R. (1964). Methods for distinguishing nulliparous from parous flies and for estimating the ages of Fannia canicularis and some other cyclorrhaphous Diptera.—Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 57, 226–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christophers, S. R. (1911). The development of the egg follicle in anophelines.—Paludism No. 2, 73–78.Google Scholar
Detinova, T. S. (1962). Age-grouping methods in Diptera of medical importance with special reference to some vectors of malaria.—Monograph Ser. W.H.O. no. 47, 216 pp.Google ScholarPubMed
Detinova, T. S. (1968). Age structure of insect populations of medical importance.—A. Rev. Ent. 13, pp. 427–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewitt, C. G. (1914). The house-fly.—382 pp. Cambridge Univ. Pr.Google Scholar
Kuzina, O. S. (1942). On the gonotrophic relationships in horse-flies (Stomoxys calcitrans and Haematobia stimulans [In Russian].—Medskaya Parazit. 11, pt. 3, 70–78.Google Scholar
Lineva, V. A. (1953). Physiological age of housefly Musca domestica [In Russian].—Ent. Obozr. 33, 161–173.Google Scholar
Mer, G. G. (1936). Experimental study on the development of the ovary in Anopheles elutus Edw. (Dipt. Culic).—Bull. ent. Res. 27, 351–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, T. A. & Treece, R. E. (1968). Gonadotrophic cycles in the face fly, Musca autumnalis.—Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 61, 690–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, A. J. (1921). The development of the ovary and ovarian eggs of the mosquito A. maculipennis Meig.—Q. Jl. microsc. Sci. 65, 395.Google Scholar