Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:43:00.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The cereal rust mite Abacarus hystrix (Acari: Eriophyoidea) is a complex of species: evidence from mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 August 2009

A. Skoracka  and
M. Dabert
A. Skoracka*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Taxonomy and Ecology, Institute of Environmental Biology, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Umultowska 89, 61-614Poznan, Poland
M. Dabert
Affiliation:
Molecular Biology Techniques Laboratory, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Umultowska 89, 61-614Poznan, Poland
*
*Author for correspondence Fax: +48 61 8295663 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The cereal rust mite Abacarus hystrix (Nalepa), a significant pest of grasses, has been regarded as one of a few exceptions among eriophyoid mites with reference to the pattern of host plant utilization. At least 60 grass species have been recorded as its hosts. Thus, the mite has long been considered as a host generalist in which host specialization would not be likely to evolve. However, recent studies have revealed that host-associated specialization is possible in A. hystrix. Here, we aimed to discriminate between the three populations of A. hystrix associated with the different hosts (namely quackgrass, ryegrass and smooth brome) on the basis of mitochondrial (COI) and nuclear (D2 region of 28S rDNA) DNA sequences. The phylogenetic trees obtained with the maximum likelihood analysis of both COI and D2 region data sets showed that host-adapted strains of A. hystrix form distinct clades. Furthermore, on the COI nucleotide tree, the quackgrass- and brome-associated strains were internally divided each into two well-supported monophyletic clusters. The nucleotide D2 region data set tree showed that brome-associated strain is polyphyletic in origin. There is clear co-variation of DNA results with earlier morphological and ecological traits, as well as the results of crossing experiments. We showed that reproductively incompatible strains of A. hystrix exhibit more than 20% sequence divergence in the COI gene and 0.2% sequence divergence in the D2 28S rDNA. Our results did not confirm the placement of three host-associated strains of A. hystrix within one, ostensibly generalist, species.

Keywords

cryptic speciesCOIcytochrome oxidase subunit ID2 region of 28S rDNADNA barcodeEriophyidaehost specialization
Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 100 , Issue 3 , June 2010 , pp. 263 - 272
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrahamson, W.G., Eubanks, M.D., Blair, C.P. & Whiipple, A.V. (2001) Gall flies, inquilines, and goldenrods: a model for host-race formation and sympatric speciation. American Zoologist 41, 928–938.Google Scholar
Abascal, F., Zardoya, R. & Posada, D. (2005) ProtTest: Selection of best-fit models of protein evolution. Bioinformatics 21, 2104–2105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amrine, J.W. Jr, & Stasny, T.A. (1994) Catalog of the Eriophyoidea (Acarina, Prostigmata) of the World. 798 pp. West Bloomfield, MI, USA, Indira Publishing House.Google Scholar
Anderson, D.L. & Morgan, M.J. (2007) Genetic and morphological variation of bee-parasitic Tropilaelaps mites (Acari: Laelapidae): new and re-defined species. Experimental and Applied Acarology 43, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Avise, J.C. (2000) Phylogeography: The History and Formation of Species. 447 pp. Cambridge, MA, USA, Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, R.D.H. & Hebert, P.D.N. (2005) Identifying spiders through DNA barcoding. Canadian Journal of Zoology 83, 481–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, C.P., Abrahamson, W.G., Jackman, J.A. & Tyrrell, L. (2005) Cryptic speciation and host-race formation in a purportedly generalist tumbling flower beetle. Evolution 59, 304–316.Google Scholar
Bush, G.L. (1969) Sympatric host race formation and speciation in frugivorous flies of the genus Rhagoletis (Diptera, Tephritidae). Evolution 23, 237–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charaabi, K., Carletto, J., Chavigny, P., Marrakchi, M., Makni, M. & Vanlerberghe-Masutti, F. (2008) Genotypic diversity of the cotton-melon aphid Aphis gossypii (Glover) in Tunisia is structured by host plants. Bulletin of Entomological Research 98, 333–341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clarke, A.R. & Walter, G.H. (1995) ‘Strains’ and the classical biological control of insect pests. Canadian Journal of Zoology 73, 1777–1790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dabert, J., Ehrnsberger, R. & Dabert, M. (2008) Glaucalges tytonis sp. n. (Analgoidea, Xolalgidae) from the barn owl Tyto alba (Strigiformes, Tytonidae): compiling morphology with DNA barcode data for taxon descriptions in mites (Acari). Zootaxa 1719, 41–52.Google Scholar
Diehl, S.R. & Bush, G.L. (1984) An evolutionary and applied perspective of insect biotypes. Annual Review of Entomology 29, 471–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downes, B.J. (1990) Host-induced morphology in mites: implications for host-parasite coevolution. Systematic Zoology 39, 162–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drés, M. & Mallet, J. (2002) Host races in plant-feeding insects and their importance in sympatric speciation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 357, 471–492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edwards, D.D. & Labhart, M. (2000) Genetic differences among host-associated populations of water mites (Acari: Unionicolidae: Unionicola): allozyme variation supports morphological differentiation. The Journal of Parasitology 86, 1008–1011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Emelianov, I., Marec, F. & Mallet, J. (2004) Genomic evidence for divergence with gene flow in host races of the larch budmoth. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 271, 97–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferrari, J., Godfray, H.C.J., Faulconbridge, A.S., Prior, K. & Via, S. (2006) Population differentiation and genetic variation in host choice among pea aphids from eight host plant genera. Evolution 60, 1574–1584.Google ScholarPubMed
Harrison, S. (1991) Local extinction in a metapopulation context: an empirical evaluation. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 42, 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassanin, A. (2006) Phylogeny of Arthropoda inferred from mitochondrial sequences: Strategies for limiting the misleading effects of multiple changes in pattern and rates of substitution. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 38, 100–116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hebert, P.D.N., Cywinska, A., Ball, S.L. & deWaard, J.R. (2003a) Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 270, 313–321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hebert, P.D.N., Ratnasingham, S. & deWaard, J.R. (2003b) Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit I divergences among closely related species. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 270 (Suppl.), S96–S99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hebert, P.D.N., Penton, E.H., Burns, J.M., Janzen, D.H. & Hallwachs, W. (2004) Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 101, 14812–14817.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaenike, J. (1981) Criteria for ascertaining the existence of host races. American Naturalist 117, 830–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaenike, J. (1990) Host specialization in phytophagous insects. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 21, 243–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jobb, G. (2008) TREEFINDER version of March 2008. Munich, Germany. Distributed by the author at www.treefinder.de.Google Scholar
Kimura, M. (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution 16, 111–120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, T. & Ó Foighil, D. (2004) Hidden Floridian biodiversity: mitochondrial and nuclear gene trees reveal four cryptic species within the scorched mussel, Brachidontes exustus, species complex. Molecular Ecology 13, 3527–3542.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindquist, E.E. (1996) Phylogenetic relationships. pp. 301–327in Lindquist, E.E., Sabelis, M.W. & Bruin, J. (Eds) Eriophyoid Mites – Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindquist, E.E. & Amrine, J.W. Jr, (1996) Systematics, diagnoses for major taxa, and keys to families and genera with species on plant of economic importance. pp. 33–87in Lindquist, E.E., Sabelis, M.W. & Bruin, J. (Eds) Eriophyoid Mites – Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPheron, B.A., Smith, D.C. & Berlocher, S.H. (1988) Genetic differences between host races of the apple maggot fly. Nature 336, 64–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monti, M.M., Nappo, A.G. & Giorgini, M. (2005). Molecular characterization of closely related species in the parasitic genus Encrasia (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) based on the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit gene I. Bulletin of Entomological Research 95, 401–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mopper, S. & Strauss, S.Y. (1998) Genetic Structure and Local Adaptation in Natural Insect Populations: Effects of Ecology, Life History, and Behavior. 449 pp. New York, NY, USA, Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nault, L.R. & Styer, W.E. (1969) The dispersal of Aceria tulipae and three other grass-infesting eriophyid mites in Ohio. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 62, 1446–1455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navajas, M., Tsagkarakou, A., Lagnel, J. & Perrot-Minnot, M.J. (2000) Genetic differentiation in Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae): polymorphism, host races or sibling species? Experimental and Applied Acarolology 24, 365–376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nicholas, K.B. & Nicholas, H.B. Jr, (1997) GeneDoc: a tool for editing and annotating multiple sequence alignments. Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center's National Resource for Biomedical Supercomputing, ver. 2.7.000. http://www.nrbsc.org/downloads (accessed 2 March 2007).Google Scholar
Ohshima, I. (2008) Host race formation in the leaf-mining moth Acrocercops transecta (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 93, 135–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oldfield, G.N. (1996) Diversity and host plant specificity. pp. 199–216in Lindquist, E.E., Sabelis, M.W. & Bruin, J. (Eds) Eriophyoid Mites – Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oldfield, G.N. & Proeseler, G. (1996) Eriophyoid mites as vectors of plant pathogens. pp. 259–273in Lindquist, E.E., Sabelis, M.W. & Bruin, J. (Eds) Eriophyoid Mites – Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pegler, K.R., Evans, L., Stevens, J.R. & Wall, R. (2005) Morphological and molecular comparison of host-derived populations of parasitic Psoroptes mites. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 19, 392–403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Posada, D. & Crandall, K.A. (1998) MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14, 817–818.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Price, B.W., Barker, N.P. & Villet, M.H. (2007) Patterns and processes underlying evolutionary significant units in the Platypleura stridula L. species complex (Hemiptera: Cicadidae) in the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. Molecular Ecology 16, 2574–2588.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rach, J., DeSalle, R., Sarkar, I.N., Schierwater, B. & Hadrys, H. (2008) Character-based DNA barcoding allows discrimination of genera, species and populations in Odonata. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 275, 237–247.Google ScholarPubMed
Sabelis, M.W. & Bruin, J. (1996) Evolutionary ecology: Life history patterns, food plant choice and dispersal. pp. 329–365in Lindquist, E.E., Sabelis, M.W. & Bruin, J. (Eds) Eriophyoid Mites – Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheffer, S.J. & Hawthorne, D.J. (2007) Molecular evidence of host-associated genetic divergence in the holly leafminer Phytomyza glabricola (Diptera: Agromyzidae): apparent discordance among marker systems. Molecular Ecology 16, 2627–2637.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skoracka, A. (2008) Reproductive barriers between populations of the cereal rust mite Abacarus hystrix confirm their host specialization. Evolutionary Ecology 22, 607–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skoracka, A. (2009) Quackgrass- and ryegrass-adapted populations of the cereal rust mite, Abacarus hystrix (Acari: Eriophyidae), differ in their potential for wheat, Triticum aestivum, colonization. Bulletin of Entomological Research 99, 33–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skoracka, A. & Kuczyński, L. (2006) Is the cereal rust mite, Abacarus hystrix really a generalist? – testing colonization performance on novel hosts. Experimental and Applied Acarology 38, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skoracka, A., Kuczyński, L. & Magowski, W. (2002) Morphological variation in different host populations of Abacarus hystrix (Nalepa, 1896) (Acari: Prostigmata: Eriophyoidea). Experimental and Applied Acarology 26, 187–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skoracka, A., Kuczyński, L. & Rector, B. (2007) Divergent host-acceptance behavior suggests host specialization in populations of the polyphagous mite Abacarus hystrix (Nalepa) (Acari: Prostigmata: Eriophyidae). Environmental Entomology 36, 899–909.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sonnenberg, R., Nolte, A.W. & Tautz, D. (2007) An evaluation of LSU rDNA D1-D2 sequences for their use in species identification. Frontiers in Zoology 4, doi:10.1186/1742-9994-4-6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stireman, J.O., Nason, J.D. & Heard, S.B. (2005) Host-associated genetic differentiation in phytophagous insects: general phenomenon or isolated exceptions? Evidence from a goldenrod-insect community. Evolution 59, 2573–2587.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swofford, D.L. (2002) PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4. Sunderland, MA, USA, Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Tamura, K., Dudley, J., Nei, M. & Kumar, S. (2007) MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24, 1596–1599.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tixier, M.S., Kreiter, S., Croft, B.A. & Cheval, B. (2008) Kampimodromus aberrans (Acari: Phytoseiidae) from the USA: morphological and molecular assessment of its density. Bulletin of Entomological Research 98, 125–134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Witt, J.D.S., Threloff, D.L. & Hebert, P.D.N. (2006) DNA barcoding reveals extraordinary cryptic diversity in an amphipod genus: implications for desert spring conservation. Molecular Ecology 15, 3073–3082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, C. & Beckenbach, A.T. (1983) Evidence for extensive genetic differentiation between the sex-ratio and the standard arrangement of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis and identification of hybrid sterility factors. Genetics 105, 71–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar