Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:41:50.590Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Castniomera humboldti (Boisduval), a Pest of Bananas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

George Salt
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

For a number of years reports have been received from the banana-growing districts of Central and northern South America of a large white grub occasionally discovered in extensive borings in the base of banana pseudostems. While in the Santa Marta region of Colombia, the writer readily succeeded in rearing the adult, which turned out to be the Castniid moth, Castniomera humboldti (Boisduval), and was able to devote a short time to the study of the insect, discovering not only that it is far more abundant than has been supposed, but also that its presence has a very serious effect on the production of bananas.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , August 1929 , pp. 187 - 193
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1929

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bodkin, G. E. 1913a. Insects injurious to sugar-cane in British Guiana, and their natural enemies.—Jour. Bd. Agric. Br. Guiana 7 (2), pp. 29–32.Google Scholar
Bodkin, G. E. 1913b. A new insect pest of coconut palms in British Guiana, Castnia daedalus Cramer.—Jour. Bd. Agric. Br. Guiana 7 (2), pp. 87–90.Google Scholar
Bodkin, G. E. 1916. Report of the economic biologist.—Rept. Dept. Sci. and Agric. Br. Guiana, for the nine months ended 31st December 1915. Georgetown, 10 pp. (Abstract in Rev. App. Ent. (A) 5, pp. 169–170.)Google Scholar
Boisduval, J. A. 1874. Species Général des Lép. Hét., I, Sphingides, Sésiides, Castnides, iv+567 pp., 11 pls.Google Scholar
Dyar, H. G. 1905. Larva of Castnia licus Drury.—Proc. Ent. Soc. Washington 7, pp. 83–84.Google Scholar
Fawcett, W. 1913. The banana, its cultivation, distribution, and commercial uses.—London, x+287 pp., 8 pls., 10 figs.Google Scholar
Grünberg, K. 1909. Zur Metamorphose von Castnia acraeoides Gray.—Deutsch. Ent. Zeitschr. 1909 (2), pp. 127–130, 2 figs.Google Scholar
Houlbert, C. 1918. Révision monographique de la Sous-Famille des Castniinae.—Et. Lép. Comp. Oberthür., fasc. 15 ; xvi+730 pp., 26 col. pls., 242 figs.Google Scholar
Lathy, P. I. 1922. An account of the Castniinae in the collection of Madame Gaston Fournier.—Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (9) 9, pp. 68–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marlatt, C. L. 1905. The Giant Sugar-cane Borer (Castnia licus Fabr.).—U.S. Dept. Agric., Bur. Ent. Bull. 54, pp. 71–75, 1 pl.Google Scholar
Philippi, R. A. 1863. Metamorphose von Castnia.—Stett. Ent. Zeit. 24 (10–12), pp. 337–341, 1 col. pl.Google Scholar
Reyne, A. 1923. Verslag van den Entomoloog.—Dept. Landbouw, Nijverheid, Handel Suriname. Verslag 1922. Paramaribo, pp. 32–39.Google Scholar
Rothschild, Lord. 1919. Supplementary notes to the review of Houlbert and Oberthür's monograph of Castniinae by Talbot and Prout.—Nov. Zool. 26 (2), pp. 1–27.Google Scholar
Strand, E. 1913. The American Bombyces and Sphinges.—Seitz Macrolep. World (II) 6, pp. 3–31, 8 col. pls.Google Scholar
Weiss, H. B. 1916. Gonepteryx rhamni Linn. and Castnia therapon Koll. in New Jersey.—Jour. Econ. Ent. 9 (3), p. 378.Google Scholar
Wolcott, G. N. 1913. Report on a trip to Demerara, Trinidad and Barbados during the winter of 1913.—Jour. Econ. Ent. 6 (6), pp. 443–457, 2 pls.CrossRefGoogle Scholar