Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T15:01:26.078Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Case of mistaken identity: resolving the taxonomy between Trioza eugeniae Froggatt and T. adventicia Tuthill (Psylloidea: Triozidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2019

Gary S. Taylor Open the ORCID record for Gary S. Taylor [Opens in a new window]  and
Francesco Martoni Open the ORCID record for Francesco Martoni [Opens in a new window]
Gary S. Taylor*
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics & Evolution, Australian Centre for Evolutionary Biology & Biodiversity, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, North Terrace, SA5005, Australia
Francesco Martoni
Affiliation:
Agriculture Victoria Research, AgriBio Centre, Bundoora, VIC3083, Australia
*
Author for correspondence: Gary S. Taylor, Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The ‘Eugenia psyllid’ or ‘Lilly pilly psyllid’, widely recognized in Australia and in the USA as Trioza eugeniae Froggatt (Hemiptera: Triozidae), is not T. eugeniae, but rather T. adventicia Tuthill. In this study we assessed morphological comparisons of materials from throughout the native and introduced ranges and re-examined original descriptions of both taxa, together with Froggatt's type specimens of T. eugeniae. Furthermore, through DNA barcoding analyses, we confirmed the validity of both T. adventicia and T. eugeniae as separate species. We re-described both species to include additional characters not previously included and designated a lectotype for T. eugeniae. T. eugeniae has smaller fore wings that are slightly more elongate. These lack infuscation around veins R and R1, vein Rs is relatively longer, meeting the costa closer to the wing apex; with certain veins bearing long, fine divergent setae, a character not previously described. It has consistently three inner and one outer metatibial spurs. The male parameres appear narrowly pyriform with a weak dorsolateral lobe and weakly sclerotized apices. T. adventicia has larger fore wings that are slightly more ovate with dark infuscation around veins R and R1; vein Rs is relatively shorter, meeting the costa further from the wing apex, with veins lacking long, fine divergent setae. The usual configuration of two inner and one outer metatibial spurs, previously used to separate the two species, appears inconsistent. The male parameres appear a little more broadly pyriform with slightly more sclerotized apices. T. eugeniae refers to a distinct species which has a restricted distribution only in its native range in southern subcoastal New South Wales, Australia. T. adventicia refers to a separate species, with a natural distribution in eastern subcoastal Australia, but has been introduced widely in southern Australia, to New Zealand and the USA. This study elucidates a long history of misidentification of T. eugeniae in the nursery industry and in almost 30 years of literature on its biological control in the USA. Regardless, the biological control program, unknowingly, targeted the correct species of psyllid, T. adventicia, in its foreign exploration and importation of the appropriate parasitoid as a biocontrol agent in the USA. Despite being firmly entrenched in both the nursery trade and scientific literature, the name T. eugeniae is misapplied. While the acceptance of the valid name, T. adventicia, might be regarded as both problematic and protracted, this is the correct taxonomical attribution.

Keywords

Biological controlDNA barcodingeugenia psyllidlilly pilly psyllidmisidentificationmorphology
Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 110 , Issue 3 , June 2020 , pp. 340 - 351
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Australian Plant Census (2019) Australian Plant Census, IBIS database, Centre for Australian National Biodiversity Research, Council of Heads of Australasian Herbaria. Available at http://www.chah.gov.au/apc/index.html (Accessed 6 August 2019).Google Scholar
Bandelt, H, Forster, P and Röhl, A (1999) Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16, 37–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collins, RA, Boykin, LM, Cruickshank, RH and Armstrong, KF (2012) Barcoding's next top model: an evaluation of nucleotide substitution models for specimen identification. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 3, 457–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlsten, DL, Kent, DM, Rowney, DL, Copper, WA, Young, TE and Tassan, RL (1995) Parasitoid shows potential for biocontrol of eugenia psyllid. California Agriculture 49, 36–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dale, PJ (1985) A Review of the Psylloidea (Insecta: Hemiptera) of the New Zealand Subregion (Unpublished PhD thesis). The University of Auckland, 628 pp.Google Scholar
Downer, JA, Koehler, CS and Paine, TD (1991) Biology and management of the Eugenia Psyllid (Trioza eugeniae Froggatt). Journal of Environmental Horticulture 9, 141–144.Google Scholar
Doyle, JJ and Doyle, JL (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin 19, 11–15.Google Scholar
Dreistadt, SH, Flint, ML and Clark, JK (2004) Pests of Landscape Trees and Shrubs: An Integrated Pest Management Guide, 2nd Edn.Statewide Integrated Pest Management Program, University of California: Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources Publication 3359, 501 pp.Google Scholar
Ferris, GF and Klyver, FD (1932) Report upon a collection of Chermidae (Homoptera) from New Zealand. Transactions and Proceedings of the New Zealand Institute 63, 34–61.Google Scholar
Folmer, O, Black, M, Hoe, W, Lutz, R and Vrijenhoek, R (1994) DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology 3, 294–299.Google ScholarPubMed
Froggatt, WW (1901) Australian psyllidae. Part II. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales 26, 242–298.Google Scholar
Hall, AA, Morrow, JL, Fromont, C, Steinbauer, MJ, Taylor, GS, Johnson, SN, Cook, JM and Riegler, M (2016) Codivergence of the primary bacterial endosymbiont of psyllids versus host switches and replacement of their secondary bacterial endosymbionts. Environmental Microbiology 18, 2591–2603.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hollis, D (1984) Afrotropical jumping plant lice of the family Triozidae. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Entomology Series 49, 1–102.Google Scholar
Hollis, D (2004) Australian Psylloidea: Jumping Plantlice and Lerp Insects. Australian Government, Department of Environment and Heritage. Canberra: Goanna Print.Google Scholar
Kimura, M (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution 16, 111–120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kumar, S, Stecher, G, Li, M, Knyaz, C and Tamura, K (2018) MEGA x: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Molecular Biology and Evolution 35, 1547–1549.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leigh, JW and Bryant, D (2015) PopART: full-feature software for haplotype network construction. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 6, 1110–1116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luft, PA and Paine, TD (1997 a) Behavioral cues associated with oviposition by Trioza eugeniae. Entomologia experimentalis et applicata 84, 293–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luft, PA and Paine, TD (1997 b) Evaluation of environmental and plant-associated cues for nymphal settling preference by Trioza eugeniae. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 85, 105–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luft, PA and Paine, TD (1998) Potential biotic factors influencing settling of Trioza eugeniae nymphs (Homoptera: Triozidae) on young foliage. Environmental Entomology 27, 1425–1430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luft, PA, Paine, TD and Redak, RA (2001 a) Limiting the potential for intraspecific competition: regulation of Trioza eugeniae oviposition on unexpanded leaf tissue. Ecological Entomology 26, 395–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luft, PA, Paine, TD and Walker, GP (2001 b) Interactions of colonisation density and leaf environments on survival of Trioza eugeniae nymphs. Ecological Entomology 26, 263–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martoni, F (2017) Biodiversity, Evolution and Microbiome of the New Zealand Psylloidea (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha) (PhD thesis). Lincoln University, New Zealand, 279 pp. Available at https://hdl.handle.net/10182/9340.Google Scholar
Martoni, F and Armstrong, K (2019) Acizzia errabunda sp. nov. and Ctenarytaina insularis sp. nov.: descriptions of two new species of psyllids (Hemiptera: Psylloidea) discovered on exotic host plants in New Zealand. PLoS ONE, 1–21. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214220Google ScholarPubMed
Martoni, F, Burckhardt, D and Armstrong, K (2016) An annotated checklist of the psyllids of New Zealand (Hemiptera: Psylloidea). Zootaxa 4144, 556–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martoni, F, Bulman, SR, Pitman, A, Taylor, G and Armstrong, K (2018) DNA barcoding highlights cryptic diversity in the New Zealand Psylloidea (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha). Diversity 50, 10.Google Scholar
Mead, FW (1994) Eugenia psyllid, Trioza eugeniae Froggatt (Homoptera: Psyllidae). Entomology Circular, Florida Department of Agriculture, Gainesville, No 367, pp. 1–3.Google Scholar
Morgan, FD (1984) The Psylloidea of South Australia. Adelaide, South Australia: D. J. Woolman, Government Printer.Google Scholar
Morrow, JL, Hall, AAG and Riegler, M (2017) Symbionts in waiting: the dynamics of incipient endosymbiont complementation and replacement in minimal bacterial communities of psyllids. Microbiome 5, 58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oshanin, B (1912) Katalog der paläarktischen Hemipteren (Heteroptera, Homoptera-Auchenorhyncha und Psylloideae). Berlin, Germany: R. Friedländer & Sohn, 187 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ouvrard, D (2019) Psyl'list – the world psylloidea database. Available at http://www.hemiptera-databases.com/psyllist (Accessed 2 February 2019).Google Scholar
Ouvrard, D, Campbell, BC, Bourgoin, T and Chan, KL (2000) 18S rRNA Secondary structure and phylogenetic position of Peloridiidae (Insecta, Hemiptera). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 16, 403–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ouvrard, D, Chalise, P and Percy, DM (2015) Host-plant leaps versus host-plant shuffle: a global survey reveals contrasting patterns in an oligophagous insect group (Hemiptera, Psylloidea). Systematics and Biodiversity 13, 434–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Percy, D (2017) Making the most of your host: the Metrosideros-feeding psyllids (Hemiptera, Psylloidea) of the Hawaiian Islands. ZooKeys 649, 1–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Percy, D, Rung, A and Hoddle, MS (2012) An annotated checklist of the psyllids of California (Hemiptera: Psylloidea). Zootaxa 3193, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, C, Buckley, TR, Frati, F, Stewart, JB and Beckenbach, AT (2006) Incorporating molecular evolution into phylogenetic analysis, and a new compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers for animal mitochondrial DNA. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 37, 545–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamura, K and Nei, M (1993) Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Molecular Biology and Evolution 10, 512–526.Google ScholarPubMed
Taylor, GS, Austin, AD, Jennings, JT, Purcell, MF and Wheeler, GS (2010) Casuarinicola, a new genus of jumping plant lice (Hemiptera: Triozidae) from Casuarina (casuarinaceae). Zootaxa 2601, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, GS, Jennings, JT, Purcell, MF and Austin, AD (2011) A new genus and ten new species of jumping plant lice (Hemiptera: Triozidae) from Allocasuarina (casuarinaceae) in Australia. Zootaxa 3009, 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, GS, Fagan-Jeffries, EP and Austin, AD (2016) A new genus and twenty new species of Australian jumping plant-lice (Psylloidea: Triozidae) from Eremophila and Myoporum (scrophulariaceae: Myoporeae). Zootaxa, Monograph 4073, 1–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thao, ML, Moran, NA, Abbot, P, Brennan, EB, Burckhardt, DH and Baumann, P (2000) Cospeciation of psyllids and their primary prokaryotic endosymbionts. Applied Environmental Microbiology 66, 2898–2905.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tuthill, LD (1952) On the Psyllidae of New Zealand (Homoptera). Pacific Science 6, 83–125.Google Scholar
Young, GR (2003) Life history, biology, host plants and natural enemies of the lilly pilly psyllid, Trioza eugeniae Froggatt (Hemiptera: Triozidae). Australian Entomologist 30, 31–38.Google Scholar
Xie, Q, Tian, Y, Zheng, L and Bu, W (2008) 18S rRNA hyper-elongation and the phylogeny of Euhemiptera (Insecta: Hemiptera). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 47, 463–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuparko, RL, De Queiroz, DL and La Salle, J (2011) Two new species of Tamarixia (hymenoptera: Eulophidae) from Chile and Australia, established as biological control agents of invasive psyllids (Hemiptera: Calophyidae, Triozidae) in California. Zootaxa 2921, 13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Taylor and Martoni supplementary material

Taylor and Martoni supplementary material

Download Taylor and Martoni supplementary material(File)
File 19.1 KB