Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:57:32.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A biologically-active compound from pupae of the sandfly Lutzomyia longipalpis (Diptera: Psychodidae) and its possible role in defence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

M.J. Dougherty  and
J.G.C. Hamilton
M.J. Dougherty
Affiliation:
Chemical Ecology Group, Centre for Applied Entomology and Parasitology, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Keele, UK
J.G.C. Hamilton*
Affiliation:
Chemical Ecology Group, Centre for Applied Entomology and Parasitology, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Keele, UK
*
Dr J.G.C. Hamilton, Chemical Ecology Group, Centre for Applied Entomology and Parasitology, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Keele, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Gas chromatography analysis of Lutzomyia longipalpis (Lutz & Neiva) pupae and fourth instar larvae revealed a compound which was not present in other larval stages. Squashed pupae were repellent to conspecific larvae and ants (Lasius niger (Linnaeus) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)), whereas second and third instars were not. Hexane extracts of pupae were repellent to conspecific larvae and L. niger, but extracts of second and third instars were not. The biologically active chemical was isolated from pupae and fourth instars and was found to be repellent to conspecific larvae and L. niger. The possibility that pupae and fourth instars may use a combined chemical and mechanical defensive strategy to avoid predation and cannibalism is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 86 , Issue 1 , February 1996 , pp. 11 - 16
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bettini, S. (1988) Sandfly breeding sites, pp. 179–188in Hart, D.T. (Ed.) Leishmaniasis, the current status and new strategies for control. New York and London, Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Blum, M.S. (1981) Chemical defences of arthropods. New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chapman, R.F. (1985) The insects, structure and function. 3rd edn.919 pp. London, Sydney, Auckland and Toronto, Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
Denno, R.F., Larson, S. & Olmstead, K.L. (1990) Role of enemy-free space and plant quantity in host-plant selection by willow beetles. Ecology 71, 124–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dethier, V.G., Barton, Browne L. & Smith, N. (1960) The designation of chemicals in terms of the responses they elicit from insects. Journal of Economic Entomology 53, 134–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dougherty, M.J., Hamilton, J.G.C & Ward, R.D. (1993) Semiochemical mediation of oviposition by the phlebotomine sandfly Lutzomyia longipalpis. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 7, 219–224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gunawardena, N.E. & Herath, H.M.W.K.B. (1991) Significance of medium chain n-alkanes as accompanying compounds in hemipteran defensive secretions: an investigation on the defensive secretions of Coridius janus. journal of Chemical Ecology 17, 2449–2458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, J.G.C, Dougherty, M.D. & Ward, R.D. (1994) Sex pheromone activity in a single component of tergal gland extract of Lulzomyia longipalpis (Diptera: Psychodidae) from Jacobina, north-eastern Brazil. journal of Chemical Ecology 20, 141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, P.T. & Hertig, M. (1961) The rearing of Phlebotomus sandflies (Diptera: Psychodidae). II. Development and behaviour of Panamanian sandflies in laboratory culture. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 54, 764–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Killick-Kendrick, R., Leaney, A.J. & Ready, P.D. (1977) The establishment maintenance and productivity of a laboratory colony of Lutzomyia longipalpis (Diptera: Psychodidae). journal of Medical Entomology 13, 429–440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lane, R.P. (1993) Sandflies (Phlebotominae). pp. 78–119in Lane, R.P. and Crosskey, R.W. (Eds.) Medical Insects and Arachnids. New York and London, Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leite, A.C.R & Williams, P. (1991) The pupa of Lutzomyia longipalpis (Diptera: Psychodidae–Phlebotominae). Parassitologia 33, Supl. 1, 477–484.Google ScholarPubMed
Malcom, S.B. & Brower, L.P. (1989) Evolutionary and ecological implications of cardenolide sequestration in the monarch butterfly. Experientia 45, 284–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, A. (1979) An introduction to animal behaviour. 3rd edn.London, Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Mukhopadhyay, A.K., Rahaman, S.J. & Chakravarty, A.K. (1990) Effect of flood control on immature stages of sandflies in a flood prone Kala-Azar endemic village of North Bihar, India. WHO/VBC 90.986. World Health Organization.Google Scholar
Service, M.W. (1993) Mosquito Ecology: Field sampling methods. 2nd edn. pp. 759–775. London & New York, Elsevier Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Weaver, D.K. & Macfarlane, J.E. (1990) Repellency of volatile acids present in frass of larval yellow mealworms, Tenebrio molitor L. (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae), to larval conspecifics. journal of Chemical Ecology 16, 585–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar