Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T17:16:58.051Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Binomial sampling plans for the English grain aphid, Sitobion avenae (Homoptera: Aphididae) based on an empirical relationship between mean density and proportion of tillers with different tally thresholds of aphids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

M.G. Feng ,
R.M. Nowierski  and
Z. Zeng
M.G. Feng
Affiliation:
Entomology Research Laboratory, Montana State University, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Field sampling of populations of Sitobion avenae (Fabricius) on spring wheat in the north-western USA from 1988 to 1991 produced a data set consisting of 47 estimates of mean aphid density (m; number of aphids per tiller), variance (s2) and the proportion of tillers (PT) with no more than T = 0, 1, 2, …10, 15, 20, and 25 aphids, respectively; defined as the tally threshold. The average sampling error level of the four-year data set was 0.196 (SE= 0.013). The empirical relationship between m and PT was developed for each T value using the parameters from the linear regression of ln(m) on ln[-ln(Pϒ)] and was satisfactory when T = 2, 3, 4, and 5 (as evidenced by the high r2 values and relatively small mean squared errors from the regression analyses relating to the T values). In comparing the variances estimated from different formulae for predicting m from PT, the variance of Binns & Bostanian (1990b) was found to be more conservative and reliable in estimating the prediction variance. This variance was used in the development of binomial sampling plans for each T and in the determination of associated sampling precision denoted by the half-width of the confidence interval (d). Binomial sample sizes based on the T values of 2–5 were found to be associated with relatively small d values that may actually be reached and thus, are recommended for use in monitoring aphid populations for control decision making. However, at population densities below one aphid per tiller, binomial sampling was found to be feasible only when counts were based on empty tillers (T = 0).

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 83 , Issue 2 , June 1993 , pp. 187 - 196
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Binns, M.R. & Bostanian, N.J. (1988). Binomial and censored sampling in estimation and decision making for the negative binomial distribution. Biometrics 44, 473–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binns, M.R. & Bostanian, N.J. (1990a). Robust binomial decision rules for integrated pest management based on the negative binomial distribution. Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America 36, 50–54.Google Scholar
Binns, M.R. & Bostanian, N.J. (1990b) Robustness in empirically based binomial decision rules for integrated pest management. Journal of Economic Entomology 83, 420–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackman, R.L. & Eastop, V.F. (1984) Aphids on the world's crops: an identification guide. 466 pp. New York, John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Ekbom, B.S. (1987) Incidence counts for estimating densities of Rhopalosiphum padi (Homoptera: Aphididae). Journal of Economic Entomology 80, 933–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, N.C. & Kieckhefer, R.W. (1986) Cereal aphid populations in winter wheat: spatial distributions and sampling with fixed levels of precision. Environmental Entomology 15, 954–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, N.C. & Kieckhefer, R.W. (1987) Spatial distributions of cereal aphids (Homoptera: Aphididae) in winter wheat and spring oats in south Dakota. Environmental Entomology 16, 896–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, N.C., Kieckhefer, R.W. & Walgenbach, D.D. (1990) Binomial sequential sampling methods for cereal aphids in small grains. Journal of Economic Entomology 83, 1381–1387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feng, M.G., Johnson, J.B. & Halbert, S.E. (1991) Natural control of cereal aphids (Homoptera: Aphididae) by entomopathogenic fungi (Zygomycetes: Entomophthorales) and parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Braconidae and Encyrtidae) on irrigated grain crops in southwestern Idaho. Environmental Entomology 20, 1699–1710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerrard, D.J. & Chiang, H.C. (1970) Density estimation of corn rootworm egg populations based upon frequency of occurrence. Ecology 51, 237–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, R.L. & Bishop, G.W. (1987) Economic injury levels and economic thresholds for cereal aphids (Homoptera: Aphididae) on spring-planted wheat. Journal of Economic Entomology 80, 478–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, V.P. (1991) Binomial sampling plans for tentiform leafminer (Lepidoptera: Gratillariidae) on apple in Utah. Journal of Economic Entomology 84, 484–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karandinos, M.G. (1976) Optimal sample size and comments on some published formulae. Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America 22, 417–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuno, E. (1986) Evaluation of statistical precision and design of efficient sampling for the population based on frequency of occurrence. Researches in Population Ecology 28, 305–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nachman, G. (1984) Estimates of mean population density and spatial distribution of Tetranychus urticae (Acarina: Tetranychidae) and Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) based upon the proportion of empty sampling units. Journal of Applied Ecology 21, 903–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyrop, J.P. & Binns, M. (1991) Quantitative methods for designing and analyzing sampling programs for use in pest management, pp. 67–132in Pimentel, D.B.R. (Ed.) CRC handbook of pest management in agriculture. Florida, CRC Press, Inc.Google Scholar
Nyrop, J.P.Agnello, A.M., Kovach, J. & Reissig, W. (1989) Binomial sequential classification sampling plans for European red mite (Acari: Tetranychidae) with special reference to performance criteria. Journal of Economic Entomology 82, 482–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabbinge, R., Drees, E.M., Van Der Graaf, M., Verberne, F.C.M. & Wesselo, A. (1981) Damage effects of cereal aphids in wheat. Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology 87, 217–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossing, W.A.H. (1990) Simulation of damage in winter wheat caused by the grain aphid Sitobion avenae. 1. Quantification of the effects of honeydew on gas exchange of leaves and aphid populations of different size on crop growth. Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology 96, 343–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossing, W.A.H. (1991a) Simulation of damage in winter wheat caused by the grain aphid Sitobion avenae. 3. Calculation of damage at various yield levels. Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology 97, 87–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossing, W.A.H. (1991b) Simulation of damage in winter wheat caused by the grain aphid Sitobion avenae. 2. Construction and evaluation of a simulation model. Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology 97, 25–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaalje, G.B., Butts, R.A. & Lysyk, T.J. (1991) Simulation studies of binomial sampling: a new variance estimator and density predictor, with special reference to the Russian wheat aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae). Journal of Economic Entomology 84, 140–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southwood, T.R.E. (1978) Ecological methods with particular reference to the study of insect populations. 2nd edn.524 pp. New York, John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Taylor, L.R. (1961) Aggregation, variance and the mean. Nature 189, 732–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, L.T. & Room, P.M. (1983) Clumping patterns of fruit and arthropods in cotton with implications for binomial sampling. Environmental Entomology 12, 50–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wratten, S.D. (1975) The nature of the effects of the aphids Sitobion avenae and Metopolophium dirhodum on the growth of wheat. Annals of Applied Biology 79, 27–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar