Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:22:48.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Attractiveness of Manitoba traps to the headfly, Hydrotaea irritans (Fallén) (Diptera: Muscidae): the effects of short-term weather fluctuations, carbon dioxide and target temperature and size

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

S. G. Ball  and
M. L. Luff
S. G. Ball
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Biology, The University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK
M. L. Luff
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Biology, The University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The numbers of adults of Hydrotaea irritans (Fall.) caught in Manitoba traps in north-eastern England varied greatly between successive 30-min periods. Weather variables accounted for 49·4% of this variation, but only wind speed and sunshine showed significant simple correlations with fly catch. Using principal component analysis of weather data, three principal components accounted for 67·3% of the variation in catch. The two components most highly correlated with catch were composed mainly of wind speed, sunshine, shade temperature and radiant temperature. These two principal components were used as covariates in an analysis of the effects of a heated target and carbon dioxide on trap effectiveness. Heating the target to blood temperature increased the catch of females 1·8-fold but had only a slight effect on the catch of males. The presence of CO2 increased the female catch nearly fivefold and the male catch more than fourfold. There was no interaction between the two stimuli of heat and CO2. A separate experiment showed no significant difference in catch between CO2-baited traps using spheres 0·6 or 0·3 m in diameter as the target.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 71 , Issue 4 , December 1981 , pp. 599 - 606
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berlyn, A. D. (1978 a). The flight activity of the sheep headfly, Hydrotaea irritans (Fallén) (Diptera: Muscidae).—Bull. ent. Res. 68, 219–228.Google Scholar
Berlyn, A. D. (1978 b). The field biology of the adult sheep headfly, Hydrotaea irritans (Fallén) (Diptera: Muscidae), in south-western Scotland.—Bull. ent. Res. 68, 431–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlyn, A. D. (1978 c). Factors attracting the sheep headfly, Hydrotaea irritans (Faltén) (Diptera: Muscidae), with a note on the evaluation of repellents.—Bull. ent. Res. 68, 583–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillies, M. T. (1980). The role of carbon dioxide in host-finding by mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae): a review.—Bull. ent. Res. 70, 525–532.Google Scholar
Perry, J. N., Wall, C. & Greenway, A. R. (1980). Latin square designs in field experiments involving insect sex attractants.—Ecol. Ent. 5, 385–396.Google Scholar
Raymond, H. L. (1977). Action de l'anhydride carbonique et de facteurs visuels sur les performances de pièges “ Manitoba ” modifiéd en millieu montagnard.—Entomologia exp. appl. 21, 121–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, J. (1978). The biology of the sheep headfly, Hydrotaea irritans Fall.: with reference to its control.—Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Newcastle upon Tyne.Google Scholar
Thorsteinson, A. J., Bracken, G. K. & Hanec, W. (1964). The Manitoba horse fly trap.—Can. Ent. 96, 166.Google Scholar
Vale, G. A. (1980). Field studies of the responses of tsetse flies (Glossinidae) and other Diptera to carbon dioxide, acetone and other chemicals.—Bull. ent. Res. 70, 563–570.Google Scholar