Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wbk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-20T04:05:50.480Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An experimentally tested model of the cumulative mating frequency curve for Lucilia sericata (Mg.) (Dipt., Calliphoridae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

J. N. Pollock
J. N. Pollock
Affiliation:
Imperial College Field Station, Ashurst Lodge, Sunninghill, Ascot, Berkshire, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

When virgins of both sexes of the sheep blow-fly Lucilia sericata (Mg.) are placed together in cages, the cumulative mating frequency curve has a regular form: the shape of this curve is believed to be largely a consequence of the progressive decrease in the density of flies available for mating. A model based on this hypothesis is successfully tested against experimentally obtained data. A mating rate coefficient is proposed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 60 , Issue 4 , June 1971 , pp. 671 - 682
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bartlett, M. S., Brennan, J. & Pollock, J. N.Stochastic analysis of some experiments on the mating of blowflies.—Biometrics (in press).Google Scholar
Donnelly, J. (1965). Possible causes of failure in a field test of the ‘sterile males’ method of control.—Proc. 12th Int. Congr. Ent. London, 1964, 253–254.Google Scholar
Kessler, S. (1968). The genetics of Drosophila mating behaviour. I. Organization of mating speed in Drosophila pseudo-obscura.—Anim. Behav. 16, 485–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, S. (1969). The genetics of Drosophila mating behaviour. II. The genetic architecture of mating speed in Drosophila pseudoobscura.—Genetics, Princeton, 62, 421–433.Google Scholar
Manning, A. (1961). Effects of artificial selection for mating speed in Drosophila melanogaster.—Anim. Behav. 9, 82–92.Google Scholar
Manning, A. (1963). Selection for mating speed in Drosophila melanogaster based on the behaviour of one sex.—Anim. Behav. 11, 116–120.Google Scholar
Prakash, S. (1968). Chromosome interactions affecting mating speed in Drosophila robusta.—Genetics, Princeton 60, 589–600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, J. M. (1956). Fertility, mating behaviour and sexual selection in Drosophila subobscura.—J. Genet. 54, 261–279.Google Scholar
Spiess, E. B. & Langer, B. (1964). Mating speed control by gene arrangements in Drosophila pseudo-obscura homokaryotypes.—Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 51, 1015–1019.Google Scholar
Spiess, E. B., Langer, B. & Spiess, L. D. (1966). Mating control by gene arrangements in Drosophila pseudoobscura.—Genetics, Princeton 54, 1139–1149.Google Scholar
Spiess, E. B. & Spiess, L. D. (1969). Mating propensity, chromosomal polymorphism, and dependent conditions in Drosophila persimilis II. Factors between larvae and adults.—Evolution, Lancaster, Pa. 23, 225–236.Google Scholar