Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:40:35.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An artificial diet with improved acceptability to three strains of Myzus Persicae (Sulz.) (Hemiptera, Aphididae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

D. C. Griffiths ,
A. R. Greenway  and
Susan L. Lloyd
D. C. Griffiths
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts, U.K.
A. R. Greenway
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts, U.K.
Susan L. Lloyd
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts, U.K.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A laboratory-reared British strain of Myzus persicae (Sulz.) did not readily accept the artificial diet that has been used to maintain North American strains. All components of this diet were re-tested in factorial tests and a modified diet was developed which contained increased amounts of alanine, leucine, phenylalanine, serine, folic acid, calcium pantothenate and pyridoxine, while omitting arginine, glutamic acid, histidine, tryptophan, valine, ascorbic acid, choline chloride, nicotinic acid and riboflavin. This diet, although less adequate nutritionally than the original diet, could maintain M. persicae for several weeks and more than two generations. It was readily accepted by aphids with few deaths in the first generation, so that it should be more suitable than the Californian diet for bioassay of systemic insecticides and for studies on substances that might influence aphid behaviour.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 65 , Issue 2 , June 1975 , pp. 349 - 358
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akey, D. H. & Beck, S. D. (1971). Continuous rearing of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum, on a holidic diet—Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 64, 353–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auclair, J. L. (1967). Effects of pH and sucrose on rearing the cotton aphid, Aphis gossypii, on a germ-free and holidic diet.—J. Insect Physiol. 13, 431–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banks, C. J. & Macaulay, E. D. M. (1964). The feeding, growth and reproduction of Aphis fabae Scop. on Vicia faba under experimental conditions.—Ann. appl. Biol. 53, 229–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, S. D. & Hanec, W. (1958). Effect of amino acids on feeding behaviour of the European corn borer, Pyrausta nubilalis (Hübn.).—J. Insect Physiol. 2, 85–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartier, J. J. & Morin, St. G. (1965). L'élevage du puceron de la pomme de terre, Macro-siphum euphorbiae (Thos.) (Homoptera: Aphididae), sur diète synthetique.—Ann. ent. Soc. Queb. 10, 69–79.Google Scholar
Dadd, R. H. & Krieger, D. L. (1968). Dietary amino acid requirements of the aphid, Myzus persicae.—J. Insect Physiol. 14, 741–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dadd, R. H., Krieger, D. L. & Mittler, T. E. (1967). Studies on the artificial feeding of the aphid Myzus persicae (Sulzer)—IV. Requirements for water-soluble vitamins and ascorbic acid.—J. Insect Physiol. 13, 249–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dadd, R. H. & Mittler, T. E. (1966). Permanent culture of an aphid on a totally synthetic diet.—Experientia 22, 832–833.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friend, W. G., Salkeld, E. H. & Stevenson, I. L. (1959). Acceleration of development of larvae of the onion maggot, Hylemya antiqua (Meig.), by micro-organisms.—Can. J. Zool. 37, 721–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenway, A. R. & Griffiths, D. C (1972). Artificial feeding of aphids.—Rep. Rothamsted exp. Stn 1971, Part 1, 193–194.Google Scholar
McLean, D. L. (1971). Probing behavior of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum. V. Comparison of Vicia faba, Pisum sativum, and a chemically defined diet as food sources.—Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 64, 499–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mittler, T. E. (1967). Gustation of dietary amino acids by the aphid Myzus persicae.—Entomologia exp. appl. 10, 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mittler, T. E. (1970). Effects of dietary amino acids on the feeding rate of the aphid Myzus persicae.—Entomologia exp. appl. 13, 432–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mittler, T. E. & Dadd, R. H. (1963). Studies on the artificial feeding of the aphid Myzus persicae (Sulzer)—I. Relative uptake of water and sucrose solutions.—J. Insect Physiol. 9, 623–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mittler, T. E. & Dadd, R. H. (1964 a). An improved method for feeding aphids on artificial diets.—Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 57, 139–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mittler, T. E. & Dadd, R. H. (1964 b). Gustatory discrimination between liquids by the aphid Myzus persicae (Sulzer).—Entomologia exp. appl. 7, 315–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mittler, T. E., Tsitsipis, J. A. & Kleinjan, J. E. (1970). Utilization of dehydroascorbic acid and some related compounds by the aphid Myzus persicae feeding on an improved diet.—J. Insect Physiol. 16, 2315–2326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parry, W. H. & Ford, J. B. (1967). The artificial feeding of phosphamidon to Myzus persicae: I. Intraspecific differences exhibited by this aphid on feeding through a parafilm membrane.—Entomologia exp. appl. 10, 437–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parry, W. H. & Ford, J. B. (1969). The artificial feeding of phosphamidon to Myzus persicae: II. The effects of phosphamidon on liquid uptake through a parafilm membrane.—Entomologia exp. appl. 12, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parry, W. H. & Ford, J. B. (1971). The artificial feeding of phosphamidon to Myzus persicae: III. Effects of phosphamidon on the longevity, fecundity and liquid uptake.—Entomologia exp. appl. 14, 389–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheel, C. A., Beck, S. D. & Medler, J. T. (1957). Nutrition of plant-sucking Hemiptera.—Science, N.Y. 125, 444–445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsitsipis, J. A. & Mittler, T. E. (1970). Convenient lighting system for inducing the production of sexual forms of aphids feeding on artificial diets.—Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 63, 1665–1667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar