Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T23:32:43.580Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Alteration in microbes changed the contents of oviposition-deterrent pheromones on the Spodoptera litura egg surface

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 November 2024

Liming Hu
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Green Prevention and Control on Fruits and Vegetables in South China, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou, China
Yirui Chen
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Green Prevention and Control on Fruits and Vegetables in South China, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou, China
Qingjun Wu
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Vegetable Biobreeding, Department of Plant Protection, Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
Qiumei Zeng
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Green Prevention and Control on Fruits and Vegetables in South China, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou, China
Taoli Zhang
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Green Prevention and Control on Fruits and Vegetables in South China, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou, China
Guohui Yu
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Green Prevention and Control on Fruits and Vegetables in South China, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou, China
Muyang He
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Green Prevention and Control on Fruits and Vegetables in South China, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou, China
Dasong Chen
Affiliation:
Guangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Conservation and Resource Utilization, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Wild Animal Conservation and Utilization, Institute of Zoology, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China
Xiangning Su
Affiliation:
Plant Protection Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences & Key Laboratory of Green Prevention and Control of Fruits and Vegetables in South China, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs & Key Laboratory of High Technology for Plant Protection of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, China
Yuping Zhang
Affiliation:
Plant Protection Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences & Key Laboratory of Green Prevention and Control of Fruits and Vegetables in South China, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs & Key Laboratory of High Technology for Plant Protection of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, China
Zhenfei Zhang
Affiliation:
Plant Protection Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences & Key Laboratory of Green Prevention and Control of Fruits and Vegetables in South China, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs & Key Laboratory of High Technology for Plant Protection of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, China
Jianmei Shen*
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Green Prevention and Control on Fruits and Vegetables in South China, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou, China
*
Corresponding author: Jianmei Shen; Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Microorganisms symbiotic with insects, whether permanently or temporarily, play a crucial role in the nutrition, development, reproduction, defence, and metamorphosis regulation. In some Lepidoptera, oviposition-deterrent pheromones (ODPs) on egg surface were used by pregnant females to modify the behaviour of conspecifics to avoid excessive competition for limited resources. In this study, we constructed four different Spodoptera litura groups, including, OH, OA, SH, and OA, which either feed on different hosts or grow in different environments. The 16S rDNA libraries of microbes from the egg surface of the four groups were constructed and sequenced. According to alpha and beta diversity indices, the microbes in environments and diets considerably influenced the richness, diversity, and community compositions of the microbiota on egg surfaces. The quantity of the main ODP components and the corresponding oviposition-deterrent activity among four groups were significantly differed among the four groups. The result of this study revealed that altering of microbes in environments or diets considerably changed the contents of ODP and oviposition-deterrent activity. As ODPs impart oviposition-deterrent activity towards closely related species, the findings of this study suggest that we should pay more attention to the role of symbiotic microorganisms in changing the ability of insects, especially sympatric species, to occupy the optimal niche when developing novel pest-control strategies.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Pregnant females use oviposition-deterrent pheromones (ODPs) to modify the behaviour of conspecifics to avoid excessive competition for limited resources (Thompson and Pellmyr, Reference Thompson and Pellmyr1991; Nufio and Papaj, Reference Nufio and Papaj2001; Honda, Reference Honda2010). Extracts from the egg masses of several Noctuid insects, including Spodoptera littoralis, Mamestra configurata, and Helicoverpa armigera, have been proved to have oviposition-deterrent effects on conspecific females (Ulmer et al., Reference Ulmer, Gillott and Erlandson2003; Liu et al., Reference Liu, Yu and Li2008; Gomaa, Reference Gomaa2010). Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) is a polyphagous pest that seriously threatens world agricultural production and food security (Ahmad et al., Reference Ahmad, Ghaffar and Rafiq2013), whose preference for good-quality plants is weaker than that of oligophagous insects (Gripenberg, et al., Reference Gripenberg, Mayhew, Parnell and Roslin2010). Pregnant S. litura presents a keen sensing ability to select optimal oviposition sites (Calumpang, Reference Calumpang2013). However, whether the microbes in the environment and diet influenced the main ODP components and corresponding deterrent activity remain unclear.

Microorganisms symbiotic with insects, whether permanently or temporarily, play a crucial role in the nutrition, development, reproduction, defence, metamorphosis regulation, and numerous other functions in insects (Douglas, Reference Douglas2009; Provorov and Onishchuk, Reference Provorov and Onishchuk2018; Malacrinò, Reference Malacrinò2022). Different insects require unique microbial populations in different environments, and sometimes even in different parts of the same insect, such as the salivary gland, midgut, and ovary, to perform unique physiological metabolism (Gimonneau et al., Reference Gimonneau, Tchioffo, Abate, Boissière, Awono-Ambene, Nsango, Christen and Morlais2014; Qiao et al., Reference Qiao, Keesey, Hansson and Knaden2019; Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Zhang and Xu2023). For example, symbiotic microbes present in the gut of termites are essential for digesting cellulose and nitrogen required for nutrition throughout their life (Zhou et al., Reference Zhou, Duan, Gao, Wang, Wang and Zhao2019). Female Costelytra zealandica use phenol as their sex pheromone, which is produced by symbiotic bacteria in the accessory or colleterial gland (Marshall et al., Reference Marshall, Jackson, Unelius, Wee, Young, Townsend and Suckling2016). The structure of insect bacterial communities is always shaped by various endogenous and exogenous factors, including parental transmission, environment, and host-associated bacteria (Wierz et al., Reference Wierz, Gaube, Klebsch, Kaltenpoth and Flórez2021).

Many insects use vertical transmission via the egg as a mechanism to ensure the transfer of microorganisms that are added to the egg surface by the females in secretions or faeces (Paniagua Voirol et al., Reference Paniagua Voirol, Frago, Kaltenpoth, Hilker and Fatouros2018). In particular, some neonate lepidopteran larvae bite through their egg shell while hatching and often fully ingest it after hatching, which will accelerate the spread of egg-surface microorganisms to the next generation (Brinkmann et al., Reference Brinkmann, Martens and Tebbe2008; Mason and Raffa, Reference Mason and Raffa2014).

Certain microorganisms associated with insects have been identified as the source of chemicals altering the behaviour of conspecifics or other organisms (Xu et al., Reference Xu, Lu, Xu, Chen and Sun2016; Engl and Kaltenpoth, Reference Engl and Kaltenpoth2018; Mazorra-Alonso et al., Reference Mazorra-Alonso, Tomás and Soler2021). Drosophila prefers to mate with conspecifics with a similar gut microbiota, which is probably linked to microbiota-dependent variation in the cuticle hydrocarbon profile (Sharon et al., Reference Sharon, Segal, Ringo, Hefetz, Zilber-Rosenberg and Rosenberg2011). Microorganisms play an important role in regulating metabolism, reproduction pheromone synthesis, and nutrition (Douglas, Reference Douglas2009; Provorov and Onishchuk, Reference Provorov and Onishchuk2018; Xu et al., Reference Xu, Deng, Zhou, Cheng, Zhang, Zhang and Lu2019). As an important kind of pheromone in insects, ODPs can avoid the fierce competition of offspring among the inter- or intra-specifics through altering the oviposition behaviour (Anderson and Löfqvist, Reference Anderson and Löfqvist1996; Růžička, Reference Růžička1996), and microorganisms play an important role in regulating pheromone synthesis (Engl and Kaltenpoth, Reference Engl and Kaltenpoth2018; Mazorra-Alonso et al., Reference Mazorra-Alonso, Tomás and Soler2021; Moyano et al., Reference Moyano, Croce and Scolari2023). Therefore, exploring whether microorganisms in the host and environment can cause substantial variations in ODP components would provide important insights into the function of microorganisms in the competition among sympatric insects for host and ecological niches.

Materials and methods

Insect rearing and sample processing

The pupae of S. litura were originally purchased from Ke Yun Biological Liability Co., Ltd. The larvae were reared with the leaves of sweet potato and artificial diet, and the adults were offered 10% honey water. Composition (g) of the artificial diet was as follows: agar (3), soybean flour (15), wheatgerm (15), yeast powder (6.5), casein (3) methyl sorbate (0.375), multivitamins (0.15), ascorbic acid (0.6), and sodium benzoate (0.375), mixed in 150 ml of distilled water. The insectarium was kept at 27°C ± 2°C under 60–70% RH and an L12 (1200 lux):D12 h photoperiod (Gupta et al., Reference Gupta, Rani, Birah and Raghuraman2005). To better understand the impact of the microbes on the host and environment in relation to the number of ODPs, the pupae were soaked in 75% alcohol for 55 s, 5–6 days after eclosion. The pupae were then rinsed three times with sterilised water in a super-clean environment. The water obtained from the third rinse was tested for sterility to ensure that the surface of the pupa was sterile. The surface-sterilised pupae were divided into four groups: OH, SH, SA, and OA. In the SH and SA groups, the surface-sterilised pupae, subsequent adults, eggs, and till to eggs of next generation were all continuously kept in sterile environment. In the SH and SA groups, the adults were both fed with sterilised honey water (10%), and the larval were reared with sterilised sweet potato leaves (75% alcohol 15 s, then 1% NaClO3 10 s, sterilised water three times) and sterilised artificial diet (103.4 kPa, 121.3°C, 15 min), respectively. Differently, the larvae in the OH group were kept in an open environment and fed with leaves of sweet potato collected directly from the outdoors; in the OA group, though the artificial diets were also sterilised, the whole insect breeding period was in an open environment.

Library construction and high-throughput sequencing

Five hundred eggs from at least three different egg masses were collected and washed using 1 ml (1×) sterile phosphate buffered saline per sample using a sterile centrifuge tube. Each treatment had three replicates. The total genome DNA was extracted from the samples using the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide/sodium dodecyl sulphate method. The 16S rDNA genes were amplified in the hypervariable region of the bacterial 16S rDNA gene V4 region using the universal primer (F341: 5-CCTAYGGGRBGCASCAG-3; 806 R: 5-GGACTACNNGGGTATCTAAT-3) with a special barcode for each sample. Libraries were generated using Illumina TruSeq DNA PCR-Free Library Preparation Kit (Illumina, USA) following purification with GeneJET Gel Extraction Kit (Thermo Scientific). The library quality was assessed using the Qubit@ 2.0 Fluorometer (Thermo Scientific) and Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 system. The library sequencing was supported by Novogene Co., Ltd, China, on the Illumina NovaSeq PE250 platform. Paired-end reads from the original DNA fragments are merged using FLASH (Magoc and Salzberg, Reference Magoc and Salzberg2011) and filtered via the FASTP software package (Caporaso et al., Reference Caporaso, Kuczynski, Stombaugh, Bittinger, Bushman, Costello, Fierer, Gonzalez Peña, Goodrich, Gordon, Huttley, Kelley, Knights, Koenig, Ley, Lozupone, McDonald, Muegge, Pirrung, Reeder, Sevinsky, Turnbaugh, Walters, Widmann, Yatsunenko, Zaneveld and Knight2010). The obtained effective tags, those with ≥97% similarity, were assigned to the same operational taxonomic units (OTUs) based on Uparse (Edgar, Reference Edgar2013). Then, a representative sequence was picked for each OTU, and RDP CLASSIfier was used to annotate taxonomic information based on the SILVA138 library via the Mothur method (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Garrity, Tiedje and Cole2007).

Statistical and bioinformatics analysis

Alpha diversity indices, including PD whole tree, Ace, Shannon, and Simpson, were estimated using QIIME software (Version 1.9.1) and compared using R software based on Wilcox test to explore group variations (Dixon, Reference Dixon2003). Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) based on weighted unifrac distance was conducted to illustrate the variability in the microbiota community composition between the groups. Furthermore, the significance of the four groups, including OH, SH, OA, and SH, was examined using the analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) method based on weighted unifrac distance (Roewer, Reference Roewer1996). Based on the taxonomic information, the relative abundance of the top ten bacterial compositions of S. litura egg surface of four groups, including OH, SH, OA, and SH, at the phylum and genus levels. Furthermore, biomarkers with significant differences among groups at different taxonomic levels were identified considering four as the threshold of the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) score (Segata et al., Reference Segata, Izard, Waldron, Gevers, Miropolsky, Garrett and Huttenhower2011).

Quantitative analysis of compounds eluted from the egg surface

Five hundred eggs of S. litura were collected 6–8 h after oviposition in a sterile environment. The eggs were subsequently placed in a 2 ml autosampler vial containing 0.5 ml n-hexane. After gentle shaking, the samples were stored at 4°C for 24 h. Next, 0.4 ml supernatant was collected into a new vial and stored at −20°C. Three biological replicates were performed. The extracts were analysed using Shimadzu GC-MS (QP2010 plus) equipped with a DB-WAXETR column (30 m × 0.25 mm ID, 0.25 μm film thickness). Helium was used as the carrier gas (1.0 ml min−1). The temperature programme maintained an initial temperature of 110°C for 4 min, which was increased to 160°C at 10°C min−1 and maintained for 1 min, and subsequently increased to 210°C at 4°C min−1 and maintained for 3 min, and then increased to 240°C and maintained for 8 min. Using ethyl myristate as an internal standard compound, the quantity of six compounds that have been proved as the main ODP components, including palmitic, palmitoleic, stearic, oleic, linoleic, and α-linolenic acids, among the four groups was examined via one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).

Comparison of oviposition-deterrent activity

Newly emerged adults are placed in a mating cage, allowed to mate freely, and transferred to a new cage after mating to ensure each female has mated, who was placed in a cylinder (diameter: 9 cm; axial length: 16 cm) composed of metal mesh covered with filter paper (diameter: 12 cm) at each end. Compounds were mixed according to the ratio of the quantitative test and diluted in 0.3 ml hexane. The mixture was used as the control and coated evenly on the filter paper on one side of the cylinder cage. As the control, the filter paper on the opposite side was treated only with the same volume of hexane. During the bioassay, ventilation of the room should be turned on to vent odour continuously. Both ends of the test cage maintain the same light intensity. Ten replicates were carried out, and the number of eggs in each side were counted after 48 h. Oviposition-deterrent effect was indicated with oviposition-deterrent indices (ODI) (Lundgren, Reference Lundgren1975). The ODI was calculated using the following equation: ODI = (C − T)/(C + T), where C is the number of eggs laid on the control, and T represents the number of eggs on the treatment. The ODI was compared between the four groups with ANOVA.

Results

rRNA gene sequencing and microbiota comparison of the egg surface among the four groups based on α-diversity index

We obtained effective tags from each sample after merging and filtering the raw tags. The average number of clean tags obtained from the OH, SH, OA, and SA groups were 82,348, 84,204, 79,031, and 81,793, which represented 98.51, 98.37, 98.07 and 98.45% of the total number of raw tags, respectively. The index goods coverage was used to measure sequencing integrity. The coverage ranged from 99.80 to 100%, revealing that the majority of species present in the samples were well sequenced. Detailed information regarding library sequencing is provided in table 1.

Table 1. Quality summary of libraries construction and sequencing

OH, group provided with host in open environment; SH, group provided with sterile host and environment; OA, group provided with artificial diets in open environment; SA, group provided with artificial diets in open environment.

The alpha diversity indices, including PD whole tree (fig. 1A), Ace (fig. 1B), Shannon (fig. 1C), and Simpson (fig. 1D) values, demonstrate the bacterial richness and diversity of the egg surface bacterial. Compared with the SH group, the OH group reveals higher PD whole tree, Shannon, and Simpson index values (Wilcox test, P < 0.05), which suggest that microorganisms in the environments considerably influence the richness and diversity of bacterial on the egg surface (fig. 1A, C, D). Although there is no significant difference in the Ace index between any two groups, group OH still shows higher bacterial diversity than the SH group (fig. 1B). The impact of environmental microorganisms on bacterial richness and diversity is also revealed by the extremely significant difference in the Simpson index between group OA and group SA (Wilcox test, P < 0.01) (fig. 1D).

Figure 1. Comparison of alpha diversity index, including (A) PD whole tree, (B) Ace (C) Shannon, and (D) Simpson values, of microbial communities on the egg surface of S. litura supplied with four diet or environment. Alpha diversity index of each group was compared with Wilcox test. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01.

When supplied with a sterile environment, the diet significantly influences the bacterial richness and diversity between the SH and SA groups, as per the Simpson index (Wilcox test, P < 0.05; fig. 1D). This suggests that the endophytic bacteria of the host play a decisive role in the structurally shaping egg surface microorganisms only in a sterile environment.

Microbial community comparison of the egg surface among the four groups based on β-diversity index

A scatter plot was used to show the variability of microbiota communities among different groups based on weighted unifrac distance (fig. 2). The first two principal coordinates of the plot, PCoA1 and PCoA2, accounted for 68.19 and 22.08% of the data variation, respectively. The AMOVA analysis revealed a significant difference among the four groups (P < 0.001).

Figure 2. PCoA for microbiota variability based on weighted unifrac distance. Each symbol represents a sample. The variance explained by the PCoA is indicated on the axes.

The taxonomic information of each OTU at different levels was obtained according to the annotation result in the SILVA138 library. Figure 3A, B show the relative abundance of the top ten bacterial compositions found on the surface of S. litura eggs of the OH, SH, OA, and SA groups at the phylum and genus levels, respectively. OTUs that were not assigned to known microbial phyla were designated as ‘Unidentified Bacteria’, which, on average, accounted for 0.69% of the total data (fig. 3A). Microbial phyla with low abundance were grouped together as ‘others’. The Proteobacteria (mean ± SD = 82.9649 ± 15.32%) was the main microbial phyla of all the samples. However, the relative abundance of Firmicutes phylum in the groups fed with artificial diet, i.e. OA (37.82 ± 5.33%) and SA (11.38 ± 1.32%), was significantly higher than that in the host-supplied groups OH (2.59 ± 0.66%) and SH (1.73 ± 1.02%; ANOVA, Duncan, P < 0.05; fig. 3A). At the genus level (fig. 3B), the major genera found in the samples changed significantly depending on the environment or diet. Acinetobacter (54.96 ± 13.48%) in the OH groups, Enterobacter (74.55 ± 1.97%) in the SH groups, Enterococcus (34.60 ± 5.24%) in the OA groups, and Providencia (58.56 ± 2.68%) in the SA groups were significantly higher than that in the other groups (ANOVA, Duncan, P < 0.05).

Figure 3. Relative abundance of top ten bacterial composition of S. litura egg surface supplied with four different diets, including OH, SH, OA, and SH at the phylum at (A) the phylum and (B) genus levels, respectively.

To identify the biomarker that revealed significant differences among the groups at different taxonomic levels, LDA was conducted using four as the threshold (fig. 4). At the genus level, some new genera were identified as the biomarker. For example, Enterococcus and Serratia genera were identified as the dominant genus and important biomarker of the OA group, respectively. Similarly, except for Providencia, Tazewell was also identified as the biomarker of the SA group.

Figure 4. Identification of the bacterial biomarker among the groups at different taxonomic levels; LDA was conducted using four as the threshold. The means of capital letter before the name of biomarkers is phylum (P), class (C), order (O), family (F), genus (G), and species (S).

Comparison of ODP components among the four groups

Figure 5 shows a decreasing trend in the average levels of six compounds from the OH, SH, and OA groups to the SA group. The OH and SH groups were fed on the host; however, the OH group exhibited significantly higher levels of palmitoleic, stearic, oleic, and linoleic acids compared with the SH group. When supplied with an artificial diet, the levels of palmitic and α-linolenic acids in the SA group were significantly lower than those in the OA group. The comparison between the OH and OA groups, both of which were supplied in open environments, also revealed significant differences in the levels of four components, including palmitoleic, stearic, oleic, and linoleic acids. In a sterile environment, replacing sweet potato leaves with an artificial diet significantly decreased the levels of stearic, oleic, and α-linolenic acids.

Figure 5. Comparison of ODP contents from the egg surface of S. litura provides different diet or environment. Different letters indicate a significant difference in the relative expression levels (one-way ANOVA, P < 0.05). OH: group provided with natural host in open environment; SH: group provided with sterile host and environment; OA: group provided with artificial diets in open environment; SA, group provided with artificial diets in open environment.

Oviposition-deterrent activity assay and comparison

Compounds were mixed according to the ratio of the quantitative test and the ODI among the four groups was compared, and the result revealed that the ODI of the OH group was significantly higher than that of the SH, OA, and SA groups. Comparably, the ODI of the SA group was significantly lower than that of other groups. There was no obvious difference between the SH and OA groups (fig. 6). These results suggest that changes in the microbial population in environments or diet considerably affect the levels of compounds on the S. litura egg surface.

Figure 6. Comparison of oviposition deterrent activity of ODPs composed of authentic compounds equivalent to 500 eggs among the OH, OA, SH, and SA groups. Different letters indicate a significant difference in the relative expression levels (one-way ANOVA, P < 0.01).

Discussion

Microorganisms supply the necessary assistance to insects in different habitats to complete their unique biology, development, fitness, and lifestyle processes (Kellner, Reference Kellner, Hilker and Meiners2003; Douglas, Reference Douglas2009; Colman et al., Reference Colman, Toolson and Takacs-Vesbach2012). Phytophagous insects harbour symbiotic bacteria that can be transmitted vertically from parents to offspring, in which the egg is a key link between stages of completely different morphologies.

The specialised structure of the terminal digestive tracts and genital ensures that symbionts are transmitted from the gut to the outside of the eggs (Kellner, Reference Kellner, Hilker and Meiners2003). A recent study using 4000 publicly available sequencing data found that besides taxonomy, the origin of the sample (whether from a laboratory or fields) (Shannon R 2 = 0.087; P < 0.001) and the diet (Shannon R 2 = 0.036; P < 0.001) were important factors that affected variation in the bacterial diversity of the gut lumen (Malacrinò, Reference Malacrinò2022). Herein, we compared the richness and diversity of microbiota at the egg surface of S. litura supplied with different environments and diets. Compared to diets, environmental factors had a greater influence on bacterial richness and diversity, which agrees with the results of large-scale data analysis of guts.

In the guts of insects from different orders, the dominant microbial phylum was identified as the Proteobacteria or/and Firmicutes phyla (Dillon and Charnley, Reference Dillon and Charnley2002; Haynes et al., Reference Haynes, Darby, Daniell, Webster, Van Veen, Godfray, Prosser and Douglas2003; Schloss et al., Reference Schloss, Delalibera, Handelsman and Raffa2006; Behar et al., Reference Behar, Yuval and Jurkevitch2008; Li et al., Reference Li, Li, Hu, Liu and Zhang2022). At the genus level, environment and diet greatly influenced the microbial structure of the S. litura guts (Xia et al., Reference Xia, Lan, Tao, Lin and You2020). Similar to that in the guts, the result of this study showed that the microbial structure of the egg surface could be influenced by microbes in the environments and diets.

Microorganisms associated with eggs may produce antibiotics that prevent the new hatching larvae from pathogen infection, implying that microbe variations on the egg surface may play an important role in environment adaptability. For example, bacteria on the egg surface of Holotrichia oblita inhibit the multiplication of the entomopathogens Bacillus thuringiensis and Beauveria bassiana (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Liu, Liu, Geng, Wang, Zhang and Shu2021). ODPs were used by pregnant females to avoid excessive competition for limited resources. The same ODP components shared among closely related species can produce oviposition-deterrent activity to closely related species. For example, a mixture of the five fatty acids found in Ostrinia zealis exhibited significant oviposition-deterrent effects on all the three other Ostrinia species (Li and Ishikawa, Reference Li and Ishikawa2004). Herein, S. litura ODPs were identified, and the main components were fatty acids, some of which were shared with other lepidopteran insects, such as Spodoptera frugiperda, H. armigera (Li et al., Reference Li, Han, Mu, Qin, Chen and Wang2001), Ostrinia furnacalis (Li and Ishikawa, Reference Li and Ishikawa2004), and Phthorimaea operculella (Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Li, Gao, Liu, Dong and Xiao2018). The relationship between the relative levels of unsaturated fatty acids in eggs and microorganisms was reported in an early study (Jackson et al., Reference Jackson, Baker and Henry1968). The results of this study revealed that the quantity of ODPs and the deterrent activity will be influenced by the microorganisms depending on environments and diets. ODP component changes may cause alteration in the abilities of intraspecific and interspecific insects to occupy the most suitable niches. Chemical substances present on the egg surface and egg-associated microorganisms could trigger downstream defence responses in the host (Hilfiker et al., Reference Hilfiker, Groux, Bruessow, Kiefer, Zeier and Reymond2014; Bertea et al., Reference Bertea, Casacci, Bonelli, Zampollo and Barbero2020; Li et al., Reference Li, Liu, He, Liu and Lu2023), and the induced plant volatiles could be used as synomones in attracting natural enemies (Fatouros et al., Reference Fatouros, Broekgaarden, Bukovinszkine-Kiss, van Loon, Mumm, Huigens, Dicke and Hilker2008, Reference Fatouros, Bukovinszkine-Kiss, Kalkers, Soler Gamborena, Dicke and Hilker2005; Conti et al., Reference Conti, Salerno, Leombruni, Frati and Bin2010). The findings of this study suggest that we should pay more attention to the role of microorganisms in changing the ability of insects, especially sympatric species, to occupy the optimal niche when developing novel pest-control strategies.

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the national key R&D programme of China (2022YFD1401200); The special projects in key areas of ordinary universities in Guangdong province (2021|ZDZX4020; 2023ZDZX4019); The Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangzhou, China (2023B03J1268); The Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering – Plant Protection Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences joint graduate training demonstration base; Guangdong teaching and research Letter (2021, No. 2); the Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering – Institute of Nanfan & Seed Industry, Guangdong Academy of Sciences joint graduate training demonstration base; Guangdong teaching and research letter (2022, No. 1).

Author contributions

Jianmei Shen and Zhenfei Zhang designed the study; Liming Hu wrote the manuscript; Yirui Chen mainly performed quantitative analysis of compounds; and all authors have equally important contributions in other instrument operation and data analysis.

Competing interests

None.

Footnotes

*

Joint corresponding authors.

References

Ahmad, M, Ghaffar, A and Rafiq, M (2013) Host plants of leaf worm, Spodoptera litura (Fabricius) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Pakistan. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Biology 2013, 2328.Google Scholar
Anderson, P and Löfqvist, J (1996) Asymmetric oviposition behaviour and the influence of larval competition in the two pyralid moths Ephestia kuehniella and Plodia interpunctella. Oikos 76, 4756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behar, A, Yuval, B and Jurkevitch, E (2008) Gut bacterial communities in the Mediterranean fruit fly (Ceratitis capitata) and their impact on host longevity. Journal of Insect Physiology 54, 13771383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bertea, CM, Casacci, LP, Bonelli, S, Zampollo, A and Barbero, F (2020) Chemical, physiological and molecular responses of host plants to lepidopteran egg-laying. Frontiers in Plant Science 10, 1768.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brinkmann, N, Martens, R and Tebbe, CC (2008) Origin and diversity of metabolically active gut bacteria from laboratory-bred larvae of Manduca sexta (Sphingidae, Lepidoptera, Insecta). Applied and Environmental Microbiology 74, 71897196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calumpang, SMF (2013) Behavioral response of Spodoptera litura (F) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to selected herbs and eggplant. Journal of the International Society for Southeast Asian Agricultural Sciences 19, 95103.Google Scholar
Caporaso, JG, Kuczynski, J, Stombaugh, J, Bittinger, K, Bushman, FD, Costello, EK, Fierer, N, Gonzalez Peña, A, Goodrich, JK, Gordon, JI, Huttley, GA, Kelley, ST, Knights, D, Koenig, JE, Ley, RE, Lozupone, CA, McDonald, D, Muegge, BD, Pirrung, M, Reeder, J, Sevinsky, JR, Turnbaugh, PJ, Walters, W, Widmann, J, Yatsunenko, T, Zaneveld, JR and Knight, R (2010) QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nature Methods 7, 335336.Google ScholarPubMed
Colman, DR, Toolson, EC and Takacs-Vesbach, CD (2012) Do diet and taxonomy influence insect gut bacterial communities? Molecular Ecology 21, 51245137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conti, E, Salerno, G, Leombruni, B, Frati, F and Bin, F (2010) Short-range allelochemicals from a plant–herbivore association: a singular case of oviposition-induced synomone for an egg parasitoid. Journal of Experimental Biology 213, 39113919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillon, R and Charnley, K (2002) Mutualism between the desert locust Schistocerca gregaria and its gut microbiota. Research in Microbiology 153, 503509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dixon, P (2003) A package of R functions for community ecology. Journal of Vegetation Science 14, 926937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, AE (2009) The microbial dimension in insect nutritional ecology. Functional Ecology 23, 3847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edgar, RC (2013) UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nature Methods 10, 996998.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Engl, T and Kaltenpoth, M (2018) Influence of microbial symbionts on insect pheromones. Natural Product Reports 35, 386397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fatouros, NE, Bukovinszkine-Kiss, G, Kalkers, LA, Soler Gamborena, R, Dicke, M and Hilker, M (2005) Oviposition-induced plant cues: do they arrest trichogramma wasps during host location? Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 115, 207215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fatouros, NE, Broekgaarden, C, Bukovinszkine-Kiss, G, van Loon, JJA, Mumm, R, Huigens, ME, Dicke, M and Hilker, M (2008) Male-derived butterfly anti-aphrodisiac mediates induced indirect plant defense. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105, 1003310038.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gimonneau, G, Tchioffo, MT, Abate, L, Boissière, A, Awono-Ambene, PH, Nsango, SE, Christen, R and Morlais, I (2014) Composition of Anopheles coluzzii and Anopheles gambiae microbiota from larval to adult stages. Infection Genetics and Evolution 28, 715724.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gomaa, HA (2010) Secretion of Spodoptera littoralis female reproductive system on deposited egg masses that possibly acts as oviposition deterring substance for conspecific females. Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection 43, 10811087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gripenberg, S, Mayhew, PJ, Parnell, M and Roslin, T (2010) A meta-analysis of preference-performance relationships in phytophagous insects. Ecology Letters 13, 383393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gupta, GP, Rani, S, Birah, A and Raghuraman, M (2005) Improved artificial diet for mass rearing of the tobacco caterpillar, Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). International Journal of Tropical Insect Science 25, 5558.Google Scholar
Haynes, S, Darby, AC, Daniell, TJ, Webster, G, Van Veen, FJF, Godfray, HCJ, Prosser, JI and Douglas, AE (2003) Diversity of bacteria associated with natural aphid populations. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 69, 72167223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hilfiker, O, Groux, R, Bruessow, F, Kiefer, K, Zeier, J and Reymond, P (2014) Insect eggs induce a systemic acquired resistance in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal: for Cell and Molecular Biology 80, 10851094.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Honda, K (2010) Chemical basis of differential oviposition by lepidopterous insects. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology 30, 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, LL, Baker, GL and Henry, JE (1968) Effect of malamoeba locustae infection on the egg lipids of the grasshopper Melanoplus bivittatus. Journal of Insect Physiology 14, 17731778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellner, RLL (2003) The role of microorganisms for eggs and progeny. In Hilker, M and Meiners, T (eds), Chemoecology of Insect Eggs and Egg Deposition. Berlin, Vienna: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 149164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, GQ and Ishikawa, Y (2004) Oviposition deterrents in larval frass of four Ostrinia species fed on an artificial diet. Journal of Chemical Ecology 30, 14451456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, GQ, Han, ZJ, Mu, LJ, Qin, XR, Chen, CK and Wang, YC (2001) Natural oviposition-deterring chemicals in female cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner). Journal of Insect Physiology 47, 951956.Google Scholar
Li, DD, Li, JY, Hu, ZQ, Liu, TX and Zhang, SZ (2022) Fall armyworm gut bacterial diversity associated with different developmental stages, environmental habitats, and diets. Insects 13, 762.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, B, Liu, FJ, He, X, Liu, XL and Lu, M (2023) Temporal transcriptomic changes in willow leaves oviposited by Plagiodera versicolora. Integrative Zoology 19, 784787.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, ML, Yu, HJ and Li, GQ (2008) Oviposition deterrents from eggs of the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): chemical identification and analysis by electroantennogram. Journal of Insect Physiology 54, 656662.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lundgren, LN (1975) Natural plant chemicals acting as oviposition deterrents on cabbage butterflies (Pieris btassicae (L.), P. Rapae (L.) and P. Napi (L.)). Zoologica Scripta 4, 253258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magoc, T and Salzberg, SL (2011) FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 27, 29572963.Google ScholarPubMed
Malacrinò, A (2022) Host species identity shapes the diversity and structure of insect microbiota. Molecular Ecology 31, 723735.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marshall, DG, Jackson, TA, Unelius, CR, Wee, SL, Young, SD, Townsend, RJ and Suckling, DM (2016) Morganella morganii bacteria produces phenol as the sex pheromone of the New Zealand grass grub from tyrosine in the colleterial gland. Die Naturwissenschaften 103, 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, CJ and Raffa, KF (2014) Acquisition and structuring of midgut bacterial communities in gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Erebidae) larvae. Environmental Entomology 43, 595604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mazorra-Alonso, M, Tomás, G and Soler, JJ (2021) Microbially mediated chemical ecology of animals: a review of its role in conspecific communication, parasitism and predation. Biology 10, 274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moyano, A, Croce, AC and Scolari, F (2023) Pathogen-mediated alterations of insect chemical communication: from pheromones to behavior. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) 12, 1350.Google ScholarPubMed
Nufio, CR and Papaj, DR (2001) Host marking behavior in phytophagous insect and parasitoids. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 99, 273293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paniagua Voirol, LR, Frago, E, Kaltenpoth, M, Hilker, M and Fatouros, NE (2018) Bacterial symbionts in Lepidoptera: their diversity, transmission, and impact on the host. Frontiers in Microbiology 9, 556.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Provorov, NA and Onishchuk, OP (2018) Microbial symbionts of insects: genetic organization, adaptive role, and evolution. Microbiology (Reading, England) 87, 151163.Google Scholar
Qiao, HL, Keesey, IW, Hansson, BS and Knaden, M (2019) Gut microbiota affects development and olfactory behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Experimental Biology 222, jeb192500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roewer, L (1996) Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) of Y-chromosome-specific microsatellites in two closely related human populations. Human Molecular Genetics 5, 10291033.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Růžička, Z (1996) Oviposition-deterring pheromone in Chrysopidae (Neuroptera): intra-and interspecific effects. European Journal of Entomology 93, 161166.Google Scholar
Schloss, PD, Delalibera, IT, Handelsman, J and Raffa, KF (2006) Bacteria associated with the guts of two wood-boring beetles: Anoplophora glabripennis and Saperda vestita (Cerambycidae). Environmental Entomology 35, 625629.Google Scholar
Segata, N, Izard, J, Waldron, L, Gevers, D, Miropolsky, L, Garrett, WS and Huttenhower, C (2011) Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biology 12, R60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sharon, G, Segal, D, Ringo, JM, Hefetz, A, Zilber-Rosenberg, I and Rosenberg, E (2011) Commensal bacteria play a role in mating preference of Drosophila melanogaster. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107, 2005120056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, JN and Pellmyr, O (1991) Evolution of oviposition behavior and host preference in Lepidoptera. Annual Review of Entomology 36, 6589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulmer, B, Gillott, C and Erlandson, M (2003) Conspecific eggs and bertha armyworm, Mamestra configurata (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), oviposition site selection. Environmental Entomology 32, 529534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Q, Garrity, GM, Tiedje, JM and Cole, JR (2007) Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 73, 52615267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, K, Liu, Q, Liu, CQ, Geng, LL, Wang, GR, Zhang, J and Shu, CL (2021) Dominant egg surface bacteria of Holotrichia oblita (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) inhibit the multiplication of Bacillus thuringiensis and Beauveria bassiana. Scientific Reports 11, 9499.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wierz, JC, Gaube, P, Klebsch, D, Kaltenpoth, M and Flórez, LV (2021) Transmission of bacterial symbionts with and without genome erosion between a beetle host and the plant environment. Frontiers in Microbiology 12, 715601.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xia, X, Lan, B, Tao, X, Lin, J and You, M (2020) Characterization of Spodoptera litura gut bacteria and their role in feeding and growth of the host. Frontiers in Microbiology 11, 1492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, L, Lu, M, Xu, D, Chen, L and Sun, J (2016) Sexual variation of bacterial microbiota of Dendroctonus valens guts and frass in relation to verbenone production. Journal of Insect Physiology 95, 110117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, L, Deng, J, Zhou, F, Cheng, C, Zhang, L, Zhang, J and Lu, M (2019) Gut microbiota in an invasive bark beetle infected by a pathogenic fungus accelerates beetle mortality. Journal of Pest Science 92, 343351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, XG, Li, X, Gao, YL, Liu, Y, Dong, WX and Xiao, C (2018) Oviposition deterrents in larval frass of potato tuber worm moth, Phthorimaea operculella (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Neotropical Entomology 48, 496502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, YX, Zhang, SK and Xu, LT (2023) The pivotal roles of gut microbiota in insect plant interactions for sustainable pest management. Npj Biofilms and Microbiomes 9, 66.Google ScholarPubMed
Zhou, J, Duan, J, Gao, M, Wang, Y, Wang, X and Zhao, K (2019) Diversity, roles, and biotechnological applications of symbiotic microorganisms in the gut of termite. Current Microbiology 76, 755761.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Quality summary of libraries construction and sequencing

Figure 1

Figure 1. Comparison of alpha diversity index, including (A) PD whole tree, (B) Ace (C) Shannon, and (D) Simpson values, of microbial communities on the egg surface of S. litura supplied with four diet or environment. Alpha diversity index of each group was compared with Wilcox test. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01.

Figure 2

Figure 2. PCoA for microbiota variability based on weighted unifrac distance. Each symbol represents a sample. The variance explained by the PCoA is indicated on the axes.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Relative abundance of top ten bacterial composition of S. litura egg surface supplied with four different diets, including OH, SH, OA, and SH at the phylum at (A) the phylum and (B) genus levels, respectively.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Identification of the bacterial biomarker among the groups at different taxonomic levels; LDA was conducted using four as the threshold. The means of capital letter before the name of biomarkers is phylum (P), class (C), order (O), family (F), genus (G), and species (S).

Figure 5

Figure 5. Comparison of ODP contents from the egg surface of S. litura provides different diet or environment. Different letters indicate a significant difference in the relative expression levels (one-way ANOVA, P < 0.05). OH: group provided with natural host in open environment; SH: group provided with sterile host and environment; OA: group provided with artificial diets in open environment; SA, group provided with artificial diets in open environment.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Comparison of oviposition deterrent activity of ODPs composed of authentic compounds equivalent to 500 eggs among the OH, OA, SH, and SA groups. Different letters indicate a significant difference in the relative expression levels (one-way ANOVA, P < 0.01).