Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:23:13.498Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A thermal preference method of bioassay of the toxicity of insecticidal films to house-flies.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

J. Ward ,
E. M. Gillham  and
C. Potter
J. Ward
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts.
E. M. Gillham
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts.
C. Potter
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Methods that have been used to confine insects to the test surface during exposure to insecticidal deposits are briefly reviewed, and their limitations are discussed. Some unsuccessful preliminary experiments on alternative methods are mentioned.

A temperature-preference method of inducing house-flies, Musca domestica L., to remain on a treated surface is described, and the apparatus is illustrated. The treated surface forms the floor of a chamber; it is maintained at a higher temperature than the walls and lid. The flies are introduced by means of a plunger device.

Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 51 , Issue 2 , July 1960 , pp. 379 - 387
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burt, P. E. & Ward, J. (1955). The persistence and fate of DDT on foliage. I. The influence of plant wax on the toxicity and persistence of deposits of DDT crystals.—Bull. ent. Res. 46 pp. 39–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busvine, J. R. (1957). A critical review of the techniques for testing insecticides.—208 pp. London, Commonw. Inst. Ent.Google Scholar
Derbenova-Ukhova, V. D. (1952). Flies of epidemiological importance. [In Russian.] Moscow.Google Scholar
Gratwick, M. (1957). The uptake of DDT and other lipophilic particles by blowflies walking over deposits.—Bull. ent. Res. 48 pp. 733–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadaway, A. B. & Barlow, F. (1951). Studies on aqueous suspensions of insecticides.—Bull. ent. Res. 41 pp. 603–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntosh, A. H. (1947). Relation between particle size and shape of insecticidal suspensions and their contact toxicity. I. DDT suspensions against Tribolium castaneum Hb.—Ann. appl. Biol. 34 pp. 586–610.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Potter, C. (1952). An improved laboratory apparatus for applying direct sprays and surface films, with data on the electrostatic charge on atomized spray fluids.—Ann. appl. Biol. 39 pp. 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar