Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T10:40:01.983Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Temporal coexistence of dung-dweller and soil-digger dung beetles (Coleoptera, Scarabaeoidea) in contrasting Mediterranean habitats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 February 2008

P. Jay-Robert ,
F. Errouissi  and
J.P. Lumaret
P. Jay-Robert*
Affiliation:
UMR 5175 Centre d'Écologie Fonctionnelle et Évolutive – Laboratoire de Zoogéographie, Université Montpellier IIIroute de Mende, F-34199 Montpellier cedex 5, France
F. Errouissi
Affiliation:
Institut Supérieur des Sciences Biologiques Appliquées de Tunis (ISSBAT), 9 avenue Zohaïr Essefi, TN-1007 Tunis, Tunisie
J.P. Lumaret
Affiliation:
UMR 5175 Centre d'Écologie Fonctionnelle et Évolutive – Laboratoire de Zoogéographie, Université Montpellier IIIroute de Mende, F-34199 Montpellier cedex 5, France
*
*Author for correspondence Fax: +33 467 142 459 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The western part of the Mediterranean basin is a transitional biogeographical region for the distribution of the representatives of the main guilds of dung beetles; towards the south, Aphodiinae (dung-dwellers) become scarce, whereas northwards Scarabaeinae (soil-diggers) progressively disappear. The number of species in local dung beetle assemblages is enhanced by this double faunistic contribution. Annual dung beetle assemblages were sampled in two sub-Mediterranean sites, which differed by 600 m in elevation, in order to determine the phenological dynamics related to the way of using dung (dung-dwellers/Aphodiinae vs. soil-diggers/Scarabaeinae and Geotrupinae). Aphodiids were active all year round, although they were affected by summer drought and, at high elevation, by the length of the cold season. This reduced activity was related to an impoverishment of Aphodiinae and to reduced temporal segregation between species. In contrast, soil-diggers were not active all year round and showed different species assemblages in the two sites. An extension of the activity period of these beetles was observed due to the occurrence of cold resistant species at high elevation. Our results suggested that the occurrence of soil-diggers seemingly did not affect the seasonality of dung-dwellers; their local abundance showed no negative correlation and, most importantly, phenological differences between dung-dwellers were always significantly higher than the seasonal differences between dwellers and diggers.

Keywords

Scarabaeoideaguildassemblagesouthern Europephenology
Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 98 , Issue 3 , June 2008 , pp. 303 - 316
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bagnouls, F. & Gaussen, H. (1953) Saison sèche et indice xérothermique. Bulletin de la Société d'Histoire Naturelle de Toulouse 88, 193–239.Google Scholar
Bordat, P. (1999) Aphodius (Bodilus) arvernicus Hoffmann, 1928, espèce fabuleuse de la Faune de France (Coleoptera, Aphodiidae). Bulletin de la Société Entomologique de France 104(4), 343–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cambefort, Y. (1991) From saprophagy to coprophagy. pp. 22–35in Hanski, I. & Cambefort, Y. (Eds) Dung Beetle Ecology. Princeton, NJ, USA, Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cambefort, Y. & Hanski, I. (1991) Dung beetle population biology. pp. 36–50in Hanski, I. & Cambefort, Y. (Eds) Dung Beetle Ecology. Princeton, NJ, USA, Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chessel, D., Lebreton, J.D. & Prodon, R. (1982) Mesures symétriques d'amplitude d'habitat et de diversité intra-échantillon dans un tableau espèce-relevé: cas d'un gradient simple. Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences de Paris, Série III 295, 83–88.Google Scholar
Dormont, L., Epinat, G. & Lumaret, J.P. (2004) Trophic preferences mediated by olfactory cues in dung beetles colonizing cattle and horse dung. Environmental Entomology 33(2), 370–377.Google Scholar
Doube, B.M. (1990) A functional classification for analysis of the structure of dung beetle assemblages. Ecological Entomology 15, 371–383.Google Scholar
Doube, B.M. (1991) Dung beetles of Southern Africa. pp. 133–155in Hanski, I. & Cambefort, Y.(Eds) Dung Beetle Ecology. Princeton, NJ, USA, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Errouissi, F., Haloti, S., Jay-Robert, P., Janati-Idrissi, A. & Lumaret, J.P. (2004) Effects of the attractiveness for dung beetles of dung pat origin and size along a climatic gradient. Environmental Entomology 33(1), 45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finn, J.A., Gittings, T. & Giller, P.S. (1998) Aphodius dung beetle assemblage stability at different spatial and temporal scales. Applied Soil Ecology 10, 27–36.Google Scholar
Finn, J.A., Gittings, T. & Giller, P.S. (1999) Spatial and temporal variation in species composition of dung beetle assemblages in southern Ireland. Ecological Entomology 24, 24–36.Google Scholar
Galante, E., Mena, J. & Lumbreras, C. (1995) Dung Beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae, Geotrupidae) Attracted to Fresh Cattle Dung in Wooded and Open Pasture. Environmental Entomology 24(5), 1063–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gittings, T. & Giller, P.S. (1997) Life history traits and resource utilisation in an assemblage of north temperate Aphodius dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Ecography 20, 55–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gittings, T. & Giller, P.S. (1999) Larval dynamics in an assemblage of Aphodius dung beetles. Pedobiologia 43, 439–452.Google Scholar
Halffter, G. (1991) Feeding, bisexual cooperation and subsocial behavior in three groups of Coleoptera. pp. 291–296in Zunino, M., Bellés, X. & Blas, M. (Eds) Advances in Coleopterology, Barcelona, Spain, AEC.Google Scholar
Halffter, G., Anduaga, S. & Huerta, C. (1982) Nidificacion en Nicrophorus (Coleoptera, Silphidae). Folia Entomologica Mexicana 54, 50–52.Google Scholar
Halffter, G., Anduaga, S. & Huerta, C. (1983) Nidification des Nicrophorus (Coleoptera, Silphidae). Bulletin de la Société Entomologique de France 88, 648–666.Google Scholar
Hanski, I. (1991) North temperate dung beetles. pp. 75–96in Hanski, I. & Cambefort, Y. (Eds) Dung Beetle Ecology. Princeton, NJ, USA, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hanski, I. & Cambefort, Y. (1991a) Competition in dung beetles. pp. 305–329in Hanski, I. & Cambefort, Y. (Eds) Dung Beetle Ecology. Princeton, NJ, USA, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hanski, I. & Cambefort, Y. (1991b) Species richness. pp. 350–365in Hanski, I. & Cambefort, Y. (Eds) Dung Beetle Ecology. Princeton, NJ, USA, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Holter, P. (1982) Resource utilization and local coexistence in a guild of scarabaeid dung beetles (Aphodius spp.). Oikos 39, 213–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holter, P. (2000) Particle feeding in Aphodius dung beetles (Scarabaeidae): old hypotheses and new experimental evidence. Functional Ecology 14, 631–637.Google Scholar
Krell, F.T., Krell-Westerwalbesloh, S., Weiss, I., Eggleton, P. & Lisenmair, K.E. (2003) Spatial separation of Afrotropical dung beetle guilds: a trade-off between competitive superiority and energetic constraints (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Ecography 26, 210–222.Google Scholar
Krell-Westerwalbesloh, S., Krell, F.T. & Lisenmair, K.E. (2004) Diel separation of Afrotropical dung beetle guilds-avoiding competition and neglecting resources (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea). Journal of Natural History 38, 2225–2249.Google Scholar
Landin, B.O. (1961) Ecological studies on dung beetles (Col. Scarabaeidae). Opuscula entomologica, Suppl. 19, 1–227.Google Scholar
Lobo, J.M. & Davis, A.L. (1999) An intercontinental comparison of dung beetle diversity between two mediterranean-climatic regions: local versus regional and historical influences. Diversity and Distributions 5, 91–103.Google Scholar
Lobo, J.M. & Favila, M.E. (1999) Different ways of constructing octaves and their consequences on the prevalence of the bimodal species abundance distribution. Oikos 87, 321–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lobo, J.M. & Martín-Piera, F. (1999) Between-group differences in the Iberian dung beetle species-area relationship (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Acta Oecologica 20(6), 587–597.Google Scholar
Lobo, J.M., Martín-Piera, F. & Veiga, C.M. (1988) Las trampas pitfall con cebo, sus posibilidades en el estudio de las communidades coprofagas de Scarabaeidae (Col.) I. Caracteristicas determinantes de su capacidad de captura. Revue d'Ecologie et de Biologie du Sol 25(1), 77–100.Google Scholar
Lobo, J.M., Sanmartín, I. & Martín-Piera, F. (1997) Diversity and spatial turnover of dung beetle (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea) communities in a protected area of south Europe (Doñana National Park, Huelva, Spain). Elytron 11, 71–88.Google Scholar
Lobo, J.M., Lumaret, J.P. & Jay-Robert, P. (1998) Sampling dung beetles in the French Mediterranean area: effects of abiotic factors and farm practices. Pedobiologia 42, 252–266.Google Scholar
Lobo, J.M., Lumaret, J.P. & Jay-Robert, P. (2002) Modelling the species richness distribution of French dung beetles and delimiting the predictive capacity of different groups of explanatory variables (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Global Ecology and Biogeography 11, 265–277.Google Scholar
Lobo, J.M., Jay-Robert, P. & Lumaret, J.P. (2004) Estimating the explanatory power of several variables and modelling the species richness distribution for French Aphodiidae (Coleoptera, Scarabaeoidea). Ecography 27, 145–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lomolino, N.J. (2000) Null model analysis of species co-occurrence patterns. Ecology 81(9), 2606–2621.Google Scholar
Lumaret, J.P. (1978–1979) Biogéographie et écologie des Scarabéides coprophages du sud de la France. II. Analyse synécologique des répartitions. Vie et Milieu C 28–29, 179–201.Google Scholar
Lumaret, J.P. (1983) La nidification des Trox (Col. Scarabaeoidea Trogidae). Bulletin de la Société entomologique de France 88(7–8), 594–596.Google Scholar
Lumaret, J.P. (1989) Sécheresse et stratégies comportementales chez les scarabéides coprophages (Insecta, Coleoptera). Bulletin d'Ecologie 20(1), 51–57.Google Scholar
Lumaret, J.P. (1990) Atlas des Scarabéides Laparosticti de France. 419 pp. Paris, France, Secrétariat Faune – Flore/MNHN.Google Scholar
Lumaret, J.P. (1995) Desiccation rate of excrement: a selective pressure on dung beetles (Coleoptera, Scarabaeoidea). pp. 105–118in Roy, J., Aronson, J. & di Castri, F. (Eds) Time Scales of Biological Responses to Water Constraints, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, SPB Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
Lumaret, J.P. & Kirk, A.A. (1987) Ecology of dung beetles in the French Mediterranean region (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Acta Zoologica Mexicana 24, 1–55.Google Scholar
Lumaret, J.P. & Kirk, A.A. (1991) South Temperate Dung Beetles. pp. 97–115in Hanski, I. & Cambefort, Y. (Eds) Dung Beetle Ecology. Princeton, NJ, USA, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lumaret, J.P. & Stiernet, N. (1991) Montane Dung Beetles. pp. 242–254in Hanski, I. & Cambefort, Y. (Eds) Dung Beetle Ecology. Princeton, NJ, USA, Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lumaret, J.P., Lobo, J.M. & Jay-Robert, P. (1996) Catalogue et Atlas des Scarabéides Laparosticti endémiques de France. vol. 26, 70 pp. Paris, France, Collection Patrimoines Naturels, Service du Patrimoine Naturel/I.E.G.B./M.N.H.N.-O.P.I.E.Google Scholar
Mena, J. (2001a) Endotermia y termorregulación en Geotrupes ibericus Baraud, 1958 (Coleoptera: Geotrupidae). Elytron 15, 145–155.Google Scholar
Mena, J. (2001b) Role of high body temperature in the endothermic dung beetle Geotrupes mutator (Coleoptera, Geotrupidae). Italian Journal of Zoology 68, 115–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, M. (1995) Testing for seasonal displacement in a dung beetle guild. Ecography 18, 173–177.Google Scholar
Preston, F.W. (1948) The commonness, and rarity, of species. Ecology 29, 254–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, F.W. (1962) The canonical distribution of commonness and rarity. Ecology 43, 185–215, 410–432.Google Scholar
Sowig, P. (1997) Niche separation in coprophagous beetles: a comparison of two multivariate approaches. Bulletin of Entomological Research 87, 625–631.Google Scholar
Stat Soft, Inc. (2001) Statistica 6. Tulsa, OK 74104, USA.Google Scholar
Veiga, C.M., Lobo, J.M. & Martín-Piera, F. (1989) Las trampas pitfall con cebo, sus posibilidades en el estudio de las communidades coprofagas de Scarabaeidae (Col.) II. Analisis de efectividad. Revue d'Ecologie et de Biologie du Sol 26(1), 91–109.Google Scholar
Wassmer, T. (1994) Seasonality of coprophagous beetles in the Kaiserstuhl area near Freiburg (SW-Germany) including the winter months. Acta Oecologica 15(5), 607–631.Google Scholar
Wassmer, T. (1995) Selection of the spatial habitat of coprophagous beetles in the Kaiserstuhl area near Freiburg (SW-Germany). Acta Oecologica 16(4), 461–478.Google Scholar
Zunino, M. (1991) Food relocation behaviour: a multivalent strategy of Coleoptera pp. 297–314in Zunino, M., Bellés, X. & Blas, M. (Eds) Advances in Coleopterology, Barcelona, Spain, AEC.Google Scholar