Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T05:04:53.492Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on the dispersion and survival of Anopheles gambiae Giles in East Africa, by means of marking and release experiments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

M. T. Gillies
M. T. Gillies
Affiliation:
East African Institute of Malaria and Vector-borne Diseases, Amani, Tanga, Tanganyika
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

An account is given of marking and release experiments with Anopheles gambiae Giles in a coastal area of Tanganyika. Laboratory-reared mosquitos were used, labelled either by the topical application of paint or by the introduction of radioisotopes into the larval breeding pans. Two different isotopes were used, 32P and 35S, and recaptures were recognised by autoradiography.

Routine catching stations were established within a circle of radius of 1¼ miles. Releases were made either in the centre or near the periphery of the experimental area, so that recaptures were possible up to a maximum of 2¼ miles.

The following results were obtained:

1. Of 132,000 mosquitos released, 1,019 were recaptured.

2. The mean flight range of females released in the centre was estimated to be 0·64 mile, and of males 0·52 mile. Of females released on the periphery, the mean range of dispersion was estimated to be 0·98 mile. Individuals of both sexes were caught at the maximum range of 2¼ miles.

3. The dispersion of recaptured mosquitos was shown to be non-random and to be related primarily to the distribution of human settlements.

4. In certain series of releases the direction of the prevailing wind had a definite effect on the dispersal of mosquitos. But in general this was a minor factor.

5. Dispersion during the first day or, in many instances, during the first two days after release was more restricted, compared with that of older mosquitos. But no difference in the distribution of catches was detected between those aged three-nine days and those more than nine days old.

6. Marked females were recaptured up to 23 days after release. Apart from the first two days, the regression of density on age amounted to a daily loss of 16 per cent, of mosquitos from the experimental area. The effect of emigration could not be assessed quantitatively, but it was held to be a minor component of the total daily loss. The relatively high level of mortality suggested by these figures is attributed to the use of laboratory-reared mosquitos.

7. The corrected sporozoite rate in marked females at the time of recapture was 0·8 per cent.

8. The survival of males was only slightly lower than that of females.

9. It is concluded from the survivorship curve that the mortality rate remained constant throughout the period in which marked females were recovered.

Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 52 , Issue 1 , April 1961 , pp. 99 - 127
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, P. C. G. (1940). Some observations on the flight of stained anophelines at N'Kana, Northern Rhodesia.—Ann. trap. Med. Parasit. 34 pp. 35–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, G. & Draper, C. C. (1953). Field studies of some of the basic factors concerned in the transmission of malaria.—Trans. R. Soc. trap. Med. Hyg. 47 pp. 522–535.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Meillon, B. (1937). Studies on insects of medical importance from southern Africa and adjacent territories. (Part IV.) Culicidae. 2. A note on Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles funestus in Northern Rhodesia.—Publ. S. Afr. Inst. med. Res. no. 40 pp. 306–312.Google Scholar
Detinova, T. S. (1953). The age composition and epidemiological significance of populations of Anopheles maculipennis under the conditions found in the Province of Moscow. [In Russian.] —Med. Parasit. 22 pp. 486–495.Google Scholar
Duncombe, W. G. (1959). An autoradiographic method for distinguishing samples labelled with phosphorus-32 and sulphur-35.—Nature, Lond. 183 p. 319.Google Scholar
Gillies, M. T. (1954). Studies of house leaving and outside resting of Anopheles gambiae Giles and Anopheles funestus Giles in East Africa. I. The outside resting population.—Bull. ent. Res. 45 pp. 361–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillies, M. T. (1955). The density of adult Anopheles in the neighbourhood of an East African village.—Amer. J. trop. Med. Hyg. 4 pp. 1103–1113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gillies, M. T. (1958a). A modified technique for the age-grading of populations of Anopheles gambiae.—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 52 pp. 261–273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gillies, M. T. (1958b). A simple autoradiographic method for distinguishing insects labelled with phosphorus-32 and sulphur-35.—Nature, Lond. 182 pp. 1683–1684.Google Scholar
Gillies, M. T. (1958c). A review of some recent Russian publications on the technique of age determination in Anopheles.—Trop. Dis. Bull. 55 pp. 713–721.Google ScholarPubMed
Jackson, C. H. N. (1940). The analysis of a tsetse-fly population.—Ann. Eugen. 10 pp. 332–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macdonald, G. (1952). The analysis of the sporozoite rate.—Trop. Dis. Bull. 49 pp. 569–586.Google ScholarPubMed
Russell, P. F., Knipe, F. W., Ramachandra, Rao T. & Putnam, P. (1944). Some experiments on flight range of Anopheles culicifacies.—J. exp. Zool. 97 pp. 135–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shute, G. T. (1956). A method of maintaining colonies of East African strains of Anopheles gambiae.—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 50 pp. 92–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zalutskaya, L. I. (1959). Comparative data on the biology of Anopheles minimus and Anopheles vagus in the vicinity of Tay-Nguen (Democratic Republic of Vietnam). [In Russian with English summary.]—Med. Parasit. 28 pp. 548–553.Google Scholar