Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T10:08:29.071Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A simple Method for breeding the House-fly, Musca domestica, L., in the Laboratory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

M. Hafez
M. Hafez
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Faculty of Science, Fouad I University, Cairo.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Various substances have been used by different workers as substrata for breeding the house-fly under laboratory conditions. Horse manure was recommended by Hutchison (1916), Glaser (1924), Grady (1928), Derbeneva (1935) and Kusina (1936). A mixture of horse manure and hog manure was used by Hockenyos (1931). Feldman-Muhsam (1944) obtained the best breeding results by using cow dung. Pig dung was preferred by Lörincz & Makara (1935). Lodge (1918) reared house-flies on a mixture of casein, bread, water and banana. Richardson (1932) used another mixture of wheat bran, alfalfa meal, diamalt, yeast and water. Kobayashi (1935) used a by-product of soya beans. Basden (1947) in his large scale experiments, necessitating about 2,500 flies daily, used a mixture of middlings, grass meal, tap water, dry malt extract and dried yeast.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 39 , Issue 3 , December 1948 , pp. 385 - 386
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1948

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Basden, E. B. (1947). Breeding of the house fly (Musca domestica) in the Laboratory.—Bull. ent Res., 37, p. 381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derbeneva, P. V. (1935). On the number of generations of Musca domestica.— Med. Parasitol., Moscow, 4, p. 404.Google Scholar
Feldman-Muhsam, B. (1944). Studies on the ecology of the Levant house fly (Musca domestica vicini Macq.).—Bull. ent. Res., 35, p. 53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaser, R. W. (1924). Rearing flies for experimental purposes, with biological notes.—J. econ. Ent., 17, p. 486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grady, A. G. (1928). Studies in breeding insects throughout the year for insecticide tests. 1. Houseflies (Musca domestica).—J. econ. Ent., 21, p. 598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hockenyos, G. L. (1931). Rearing house flies for testing contact insecticides.—J. econ. Ent., 24, p. 717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchison, R. H. (1916). Notes on the preoviposition period of the house fly, Musca domestica L.—Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric., no. 345.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, H. (1935). The influence of temperature upon the development of larvae of Musca domestica.—Trans. Dynam. Develop., 10, p. 385.Google Scholar
Kusina, O. S. (1936). Fecundity and preadult mortality in Musca domestica L.—Med. Parasitol., Moscow, 5, p. 329.Google Scholar
Lodge, O. C. (1918). An examination of the sense reactions of flies.—Bull. ent. Res., 9, p. 141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lörincz, F. & Makara, G. (1935). Observations and experiments on fly control and the biology of the house fly.—L. O. N. Hlth Org., C. H. Hyg. rur. E. H.5.Google Scholar
Richardson, H. H. (1932). An efficient medium for rearing house flies throughout the year.—Science, 76, p. 350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar