Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:20:24.994Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sampling Anopheles arabiensis, A. gambiae sensu lato and A. funestus (Diptera: Culicidae) with CDC light-traps near a rice irrigation area and a sugarcane belt in western Kenya

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

A.K. Githeko*
Affiliation:
Kenya Medical Research Institute, Vector Biology and Control Research Centre, Kisumu, Kenya
M.W. Service
Affiliation:
Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
C.M. Mbogo
Affiliation:
Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kilifi Research Unit, Kilifi, Kenya
F.A. Atieli
Affiliation:
Kenya Medical Research Institute, Vector Biology and Control Research Centre, Kisumu, Kenya
F.O. Juma
Affiliation:
Kenya Medical Research Institute, Vector Biology and Control Research Centre, Kisumu, Kenya
*
Correspondence. A.K. Githeko, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Vector Biology and Control Research Centre, P.O. Box 1578, Kisumu, Kenya.

Abstract

CDC (Communicable Disease Center) light-traps were compared with human-bait collections as an alternative method for sampling malaria vectors in two villages of western Kenya. The numbers of Anopheles funestus Giles and Anopheles gambiae sensu lato Giles in CDC light-trap collections were significantly correlated to the numbers caught in human-bait collections, but in Anopheles arabiensis Patton the two collections were not significantly correlated. Most of the female vectors collected in the traps were unfed. Parity of A. arabiensis collected in CDC light-traps (44.3%) was significantly lower than the rate obtained from females caught on human-bait (54.5%). Although CDC light-traps provide a cheap and convenient method for collecting vectors, further studies should nevertheless be undertaken to determine the influence of species-specific variation in the sizes and age-structure of collections because such variations can affect the epidemiological interpretation of the data.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Carnavale, P. & Le Pont, F. (1973) Epidemiologie du paludisme humain en Republique Populaire de Congo. II–Utilisation des pièges lumineux ‘CDC’ comme moyen d'échantillonnage des populations anopheliennes. Cahiers O.R.S.T.O.M. Série Entomologie Médicale et Parasitologie 11, 263270.Google Scholar
Chandler, J.A., Highton, R.B., & Hill, M.N. (1975) Mosquitoes of the Kano Plain, Kenya I. Results of indoor collections in irrigated and non-irrigated areas using human-bait and light-traps. Journal of Medical Entomology 5, 501510.Google Scholar
Coluzzi, M. & Collins, F.H. (1986) Vector biology. pp. 273276 in A.A, Buck (Ed.) Practical considerations on malaria vaccines and clinical trials. Proceedings of the Conference on Malaria in Africa. Washington D.C.Google Scholar
Coz, J., Hamon, H., Vervent, G., & Sales, S. (1971) Contribution à I'étude du piége lumineux ‘CDC miniature light-traps’ comme moyen d'échantillonnage de populations anophéliennes dans le Sud-Ouest de la Haute-Volta. Cahiers O.R.S.T.O.M. Série Entomologie Médicale Parasitologie 9, 417430.Google Scholar
Garrett-Jones, C. & Magayuka, S.A. (1975) Studies on the natural incidence of Plasmodium and Wuchereria infections in Anopheles in rural East Africa I—Assessment of densities by trapping hungry female Anopheles gambiae Giles species. World Health Organization (mimeographed document) WHO/MAL/75:851, WHO/VBC/75:541.Google Scholar
Gillies, M.T. (1970) Assessment of control: some problems in the measurement of anopheline population. Miscellaneous Publications of the Entomological Society of America 7, 156167.Google Scholar
Gillies, M.T. (1988) Anopheline mosquitoes: vector behaviour and bionomics. pp. 139179 in Wemsdorfer, W.H. & McGregor, I. (Eds) volume II. Malaria: principles and practice of malariology. London, Churchill Livingstone.Google Scholar
Gillies, M.T. & Wilkes, T.J. (1972) The range of attractions of animal and carbon dioxide for mosquitoes. Studies in a freshwater area of West Africa. Bulletin of Entomological Research 61, 389404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Githeko, A.K. (1992) The behaviour and ecology of malaria vectors and malaria transmission in Kisumu district of western Kenya. PhD Thesis, University of Liverpool.Google Scholar
Lines, J.D., Curtis, C.F., Wilkes, T.J. & Njunwa, K.J. (1991) Monitoring human-biting mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in Tanzania with light-traps hung besides mosquito nets. Bulletin of Entomological Research 81, 7784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxwell, C.A., Curtis, C.F., Haji, H., Kisumku, S., Thalib, A.T. & Yahya, A.S. (1990) Control of bancroftian filanasis by integrating therapy with vector control using polystyrene beads in wet latrines. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 84, 709714CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mukiama, T.K. & Mwangi, R.W. (1990) Population and cytogenetic observations on Anopheles arabiensis Patton of Mwea irrigation scheme. Insect Science and its Application 11, 119130.Google Scholar
Odetoyinbo, J.A. (1969) Preliminary investigations on the use of light-traps for sampling malaria vectors in The Gambia. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 40, 547560Google ScholarPubMed
Rubio-Palis, Y. & Curtis, C.F. (1992) Evaluation of different methods of catching anopheline mosquitoes in western Venezuela. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association 8, 261267.Google ScholarPubMed
Service, M.W. (1970) A battery-operated light-trap for sampling mosquito populations. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 43, 635641.Google ScholarPubMed
Service, M.W. (1977) A critical review of procedures for sampling populations of adult mosquitoes. Bulletin of Entomological Research 67, 343382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Service, M.W. (1993) Mosquitoes ecology. Field sampling methods. 2nd ed.London, Elsevier and Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar