Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T04:08:09.113Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A revision of the north-western European species of the vitripennis, pallipes, octonarius, triangulator, fraternus, formosus, parasitellae, metacarpalis and circumscriptus-groups of Apanteles Förster (Hymenoptera, Braconidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

G. E. J. Nixon
G. E. J. Nixon
Affiliation:
c/o British Museum (Natural History), Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The north-western European species of the vitripennis, pallipes, octonarius, triangulator, fraternus, formosus, parasitellae, metacarpalis and circumscriptus-groups of Apanteles are revised. Sixty-five species are dealt with, of which twenty-four are described as new. One species, A. exiguus (Haliday), is lifted from synonymy. Brief notes are added on North American species of the circumscriptus-group in the British Museum (Nat. Hist.) to assist their eventual correlation with the European species. Reference is also made to two species of Hypomicrogaster.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 63 , Issue 2 , December 1973 , pp. 169 - 230
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashmead, W. H. (1898). Descriptions of new parasitic Hymenoptera. — Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 4, 155–171.Google Scholar
Bouché, P. F. (1934). Naturgeschichte der Insekten besonders in Hinsicht ihrer ersten Zustände als Larven und Puppen. Lief 1. — 216 pp. Berlin.Google Scholar
Čapek, M. (1972). Verzeichnis der aus Schädlingsinsekten erzogenen Parasiten. Teil IV. — Die Brackwespen (Braconidae, Hymenoptera). — Ent. Problémy 10, 125–140.Google Scholar
Čapek, M. & Zwölfer, H. (1957). Apanteles murinanae nov. spec. (Braconidae, Hym.), ein neuer Parasit des Tannentriebwicklers. — Mitt. schweiz. ent. Ges. 30, 119–126.Google Scholar
Curtis, J. (1830). British Entomology 7. — 321 pp. London.Google Scholar
Delucchi, V. L. (1958). Lithocolletis messaniella Zeller (Lep. Gracilariidae): Analysis of some mortality factors with particular reference to its parasite complex. — Entomophaga 3, 203–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, M. (1962). Neue Braconiden-Parasiten von schädlichen Insekten (Hymenoptera). — Z. angew. Ent. 49, 297–312.Google Scholar
Haliday, A. H. (1834). An essay on the classification of parasitic Hymenoptera. — Entomologist's Mag. 2, 225–259.Google Scholar
Jones, D. W. (1929). Imported parasites of the European corn borer in America. — Tech. Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric. no. 98, 28 pp.Google Scholar
Lyle, G. T. (1916). Contributions to our knowledge of the British Braconidae. — Entomologist 49, 268–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyle, G. T. (1917). Contributions to our knowledge of the British Braconidae. — Entomologist 50, 193–201.Google Scholar
Lyle, G. T. (1927). Two new species of Apanteles (Hym., Braconidae). — Bull. ent. Res. 17, 415–416.Google Scholar
Marshall, T. A. (1885). Monograph of the British Braconidae. I. — Trans. ent. Soc. Lond. 1885, 1–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, W. R. M. (1959). Some new Braconidae (Hymenoptera). — Can. ent. 91, 42–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morley, C. (1902). A new species of Microgaster. — Entomologist's Mag. 28, 4–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muesebeck, C. F. W. (1920). A revision of the North American species of ichneumon-flies belonging to the genus Apanteles. — Proc. U.S. natn. Mus. 58, 483–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muesebeck, C. F. W. (1928). A new European species of Apanteles parasitic on the gipsy moth. — Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 30, 8–9.Google Scholar
Nees Von Esenbeck, C. G. D. (1934). Hymenopterorum Ichneumonibus affinium monographiae, genera Europaea et species illustrantes, I. — 320 pp. Stuttgart and Tübingen.Google Scholar
Nixon, G. E. J. (1961). Two new European species of Apanteles (Hymenoptera, Braconidae). — Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (B) 30, 50–52.Google Scholar
Nixon, G. E. J. (1965). A reclassification of the tribe Microgasterini (Hymenoptera, Braconidae). — Bull. Br. Mus. nat. Hist. (Ent.) Suppl. 2, 1–284.Google Scholar
Nixon, G. E. J. (1972). A revision of the north-western European species of the laevigatus-group of Apanteles Förster (Hymenoptera, Braconidae). — Bull. ent. Res. 62, 701–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratzeburg, J. T. C. (1844–1852). Die Ichneumonen der Forstinsecten in forstlicher und entomologischer Beziehung, als Anhang zur Abbildung und Beschreibung der Forstinsecten 1–3. — 224; 238; 272 pp. Berlin.Google Scholar
Reinhard, H. (1880). Beiträge zur Kenntniss einiger Braconiden-Gattungen. — Dt. ent. Z. 24, 353–370.Google Scholar
Reinhard, H. (1881). Beiträge zur Kenntniss einiger Braconiden-Gattungen. — Dt. ent. Z. 25, 33–52.Google Scholar
Rohwer, S. W. (1913). Descriptions of new parasitic Hymenoptera. — Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 15, 180–188.Google Scholar
Roman, A. (1924). Rep. scient. Results Norw. Exped. Nova Zemlya 1921, no. 14, 11–25.Google Scholar
Szepligeti, G. V. (1904). Hymenoptera Fam. (Première Partie) Braconidae. — Genera insect. 22. 253 pp., 3 pls. Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Telenga, N. A. (1949). Faunal list of parasites of the family Braconidae (Hymenoptera). Tadzhikistan. — Ént. Obozr. 30, 381–388.Google Scholar
Telenga, N. A. (1955). Fam. Braconidae, subfamilies Microgasterninae, Agathinae. — Fauna Rossǐi (Hymenoptera) 5(4), 311 pp. Moscow & Leningrad.Google Scholar
Thomson, C. G. (1869–1897). Opuscula entomologica. — 2452 pp. Lund.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vance, A. M. (1931). Apanteles thompsoni Lyle, a Braconid parasite of the European corn borer. — Tech. Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric. no. 233, 28 pp.Google Scholar
Viereck, H. L. (1911). Descriptions of six new genera and thirty-one new species of ichneumon flies. — Proc. U.S. natn. Mus. 40, 170–196.Google Scholar
Weed, C. M. (1887). Notes on some Illinois Microgasters: with descriptions of new species. — Bull. Ill. St. Lab. nat. Hist. 3, 1–8.Google Scholar
Wesmael, C. (1837). Monographie des Braconides de Belgique. — Nouv. Mém. Acad. Sci. Bruxelles 10, 68 pp.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, D. S. (1932). A revision of the Ethiopian species of the genus Apanteles (Hym. Bracon.). — Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 80, 301–344.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, D. S. (1936). Microgasterinae: notes and new species (Hym. Brac.). — Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (B) 5, 81–88.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, D. S. (1938). On a further two new Palaearctic species of Apanteles (Hym. Brac.). — Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (B) 7, 222–227.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, D. S. (1939). On two species of Apanteles (Hym. Brac.) not previously recognized from the western Palaearctic region. — Bull. ent. Res. 30, 77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, D. S. (1941). New species of Apanteles (Hym. Brac.)—II. — Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (B) 10, 28–34.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, D. S. (1945). Description of Palaearctic species of Apanteles (Hymen. Braconidae). — Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 95, 35–226.Google Scholar