Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:57:25.609Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response of Aphidius colemani to aphid sex pheromone varies depending on plant synergy and prior experience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2015

G.M. Fernández-Grandon  and
G.M. Poppy
G.M. Fernández-Grandon*
Affiliation:
Centre for Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, UK, SO17 1BJ
G.M. Poppy
Affiliation:
Centre for Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, UK, SO17 1BJ
*
*Author for correspondence Phone: +44 (0)1634 88 3057 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A critical stage in the success of a parasitoid is the ability to locate a host within its habitat. It is hypothesized that a series of olfactory cues may be involved in altering the parasitoid's movement patterns at this stage of foraging. This paper focuses specifically on host habitat location and host location and the olfactory stimuli necessary to mediate the transition between these stages. Firstly, we confirm the ability of the parasitoid Aphidius colemani to detect the aphid sex pheromone at an electrophysiological level. Following this we investigate the effect of the sex pheromone component (4aS,7S,7aR)-nepetalactone on the movement patterns of A. colemani and its retention within an area. The key findings of this work are that A. colemani is able to detect the sex pheromone components, that parasitoid retention is increased by a synergy of nepetalactone and other host-associated cues and that foraging patterns are augmented by the presence of nepetalactone or experience associated with nepetalactone.

Type
Research Papers
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 105 , Issue 4 , August 2015 , pp. 507 - 514
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alphen, J.V. & Vet, L.E.M. (1986) An evolutionary approach to host finding and selection. in Waage, J., Greathead, D. (Eds) Insect Parasitoids. 13th Symposium of the Royal Entomological Society of London 18–19 September 1985, at the Department of Physics Lecture Theatre, Imperial College, London, Academic Press, 23–61.Google Scholar
Ameixa, O.M.C.C. & Kindlmann, P. (2012) Effect of synthetic and plant-extracted aphid pheromones on the behaviour of Aphidius colemani . Journal of Applied Entomology 136, 292–301.Google Scholar
Benelli, G., Carpita, A., Simoncini, S., Raspi, A. & Canale, A. (2014) For sex and more: attraction of the tephritid parasitoid Psyttalia concolor (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) to male sex pheromone of the olive fruit fly, Bactrocera oleae . Journal of Pest Science 87, 449–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackman, R.L. (1971) Variation in the photoperiodic response within natural populations of Myzus persicae (Sulz.). Bulletin of Entomological Research 60, 533–546.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Croze, H. (1970) Searching image in carrion crows: hunting strategy in a predator and some anti-predator devices in camouflaged prey. Parey Berlin 5, 1–85.Google Scholar
Dong, W.X., Zhang, F., Fang, Y.L. & Zhang, Z.N. (2008) Electroantennogram responses of aphid parasitoid Aphidius gifuensis to aphid pheromones and host–plant volatiles. Chinese Journal of Ecology 27, 591–595.Google Scholar
Du, Y.J., Poppy, G.M. & Powell, W. (1996) Relative importance of semiochemicals from first and second trophic levels in host foraging behavior of Aphidius ervi . Journal of Chemical Ecology 22, 1591–1605.Google Scholar
Fernández-Grandon, G.M., Woodcock, C.M. & Poppy, G.M. (2013) Do asexual morphs of the peach–potato aphid, Myzus persicae, utilise the aphid sex pheromone? Behavioural and electrophysiological responses of M. persicae virginoparae to (4aS, 7S, 7aR)-nepetalactone and its effect on aphid performance. Bulletin of Entomological Research 103, 466–472.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glinwood, R.T., Powell, W. & Tripathi, C.P.M. (1998) Increased parasitization of aphids on trap plants alongside vials releasing synthetic aphid sex pheromone and effective range of the pheromone. Biocontrol Science and Technology 8, 607–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glinwood, R.T., Du, Y.J. & Powell, W. (1999) Responses to aphid sex pheromones by the pea aphid parasitoids Aphidius ervi and Aphidius eadyi . Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 92, 227–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guerrieri, E., Pennacchio, F. & Tremblay, E. (1997) Effect of adult experience on in-flight orientation to plant and plant–host complex volatiles in Aphidius ervi Haliday (Hymenoptera, Braconidae). Biological Control 10, 159–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardie, J. & Minks, A.K. (1999) Pheromones of non-Lepidopteran Insects Associated with Agricultural Plants. Wallingford, CAB International.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardie, J., Holyoak, M., Nicholas, J., Nottingham, S.F., Pickett, J.A., Wadhams, L.J. & Woodcock, C.M. (1990) Aphid sex pheromone components: age-dependent release by females and species-specific male response. Chemoecology 1, 63–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardie, J., Nottingham, S.F., Powell, W. & Wadhams, L.J. (1991) Synthetic aphid sex pheromone lures female parasitoids. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 61, 97–99.Google Scholar
Hassell, M.P. & May, R.M. (1974) Aggregation of predators and insect parasites and its effect on stability. The Journal of Animal Ecology 43, 567–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassell, M. & Southwood, T.R.E. (1978) Foraging strategies of insects. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 9, 75–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoballah, M.E.F. & Turlings, T.C.J. (2001) Experimental evidence that plants under caterpillar attack may benefit from attracting parasitoids. Evolutionary Ecology Research 3, 553–565.Google Scholar
Leroy, P.D., Schillings, T., Farmakidis, J., Heuskin, S., Lognay, G., Verheggen, F.J., Brostaux, Y., Haubruge, E. & Francis, F. (2012) Testing semiochemicals from aphid, plant and conspecific: attraction of Harmonia axyridis . Insect Science 19, 372–382.Google Scholar
Loon, J.J.V., Boer, J.G. & Dicke, M. (2000) Parasitoid-plant mutualism: parasitoid attack of herbivore increases plant reproduction. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 97, 219–227.Google Scholar
Luck, R.F., van Lenteren, J.C., Twine, P.H., Juenen, L. & Unruh, T. (1979) Prey or host searching behavior that leads to a sigmoid functional response in invertebrate predators and parasitoids. Researches on Population Ecology 20, 257–264.Google Scholar
Maddrell, S.H.P. (1969) Secretion by the Malpighian tubules of Rhodnius. The movements of ions and water. Journal of Experimental Biology 51, 71–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandelbrot, B.B. (1983) The Fractal Geometry of Nature. Henry Holt and Company, New York City, USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, D. (1975) Responses of male aphids to the female sex pheromone in Megoura viciae Buckton. Journal of Entomology Series A, General Entomology 50, 43–64.Google Scholar
Micha, S.G. & Wyss, U. (1996) Aphid alarm pheromone (E)-β-farnesene: a host finding kairomone for the aphid primary parasitoid Aphidius uzbekistanicus (Hymenoptera: Aphidiinae). Chemoecology 7, 132–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, K.C., Zhu, J., Harris, J., Ochieng, S.A. & Baker, T.C. (2001) Electroantennogram responses of a parasitic wasp, Microplitis croceipes, to host-related volatile and anthropogenic compounds. Physiological Entomology 26, 69–77.Google Scholar
Pettersson, J. (1970) An aphid sex attractant. Insect Systematics and Evolution 1, 63–73.Google Scholar
Poppy, G.M., Powell, W. & Pennacchio, F. (1997) Aphid parasitoid responses to semiochemicals—genetic, conditioned or learnt? Entomophaga 42, 193–199.Google Scholar
Powell, W. & Pickett, J.A. (2003) Manipulation of parasitoids for aphid pest management: progress and prospects. Pest Management Science 59, 149–155.Google Scholar
Powell, W., A'Hara, S., Harling, R., Holl, J., Northing, P., Thomas, C.F.G. & Walters, K.F.A. (2004) Managing biodiversity in field margins to enhance integrated pest control in arable crops (3-D farming project). HGCA Project Report 356, 80–96.Google Scholar
Storeck, A., Poppy, G.M., Emden, H.V. & Powell, W. (2000) The role of plant chemical cues in determining host preference in the generalist aphid parasitoid Aphidius colemani . Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 97, 41–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turlings, T.C., Wäckers, F.L., Vet, L.E., Lewis, W.J. & Tumlinson, J.H. (1993) Learning of host-finding cues by hymenopterous parasitoids. pp. 51–78 in Papaj, D.R. & Lewis, A.C. (Eds) Insect Learning. USA, Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vet, L.E. & Dicke, M. (1992) Ecology of infochemical use by natural enemies in a tritrophic context. Annual Review of Entomology 37, 141–172.Google Scholar
Vinson, S.B. (1976) Host selection by insect parasitoids. Annual Review of Entomology 21, 109–133.Google Scholar
Viswanathan, G.M., Raposo, E.P. & Da Luz, M.G.E. (2008) Lévy flights and superdiffusion in the context of biological encounters and random searches. Physics of Life Reviews 5, 133–150.Google Scholar
Wadhams, L.J., Angst, M.E. & Blight, M.M. (1982) Responses of the olfactory receptors of Scolytus scolytus (F.)(Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to the stereoisomers of 4-methyl-3-heptanol. Journal of Chemical Ecology 8, 477–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wadhams, L.J., Birkett, M.A., Powell, W. & Woodcock, C.M. (1999) Aphids, predators, and parasitoids. pp. 60–67 in Chadwick, D. & Goode, J. (Eds) Insect–Plant Interactions and Induced Plant Defences. Novartis Foundation Symposium 223, Chichester, Wiley.Google Scholar
Wäschke, N., Hardge, K., Hancock, C., Hilker, M., Obermaier, E. & Meiners, T. (2014) Habitats as complex odour environments: how does plant diversity affect herbivore and parasitoid orientation? PLoS ONE 9, e85152.Google Scholar
Wellings, P.W. (1991) Host location and oviposition on animals. pp. 75–107 in Bailey, W.J. & Ridsdill-Smith, J. (Eds) Reproductive Behavior of Insects: Individuals and Populations. London, Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Zhang, Q.H., Sheng, M., Chen, G., Aldrich, J.R. & Chauhan, K.R. (2006) Iridodial: a powerful attractant for the green lacewing, Chrysopa septempunctata (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Naturwissenschaften 93, 461–465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed