Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T02:03:10.426Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Researches on the ecology and biology of Eurygaster integriceps Put. (Hemiptera, Scutelleridae) in Middle East countries, with special reference to the overwintering period

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

E. S. Brown
E. S. Brown
Affiliation:
Commonwealth Institute of Entomology.*
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Three years of research on Eurygaster integriceps Put., and other Pentatomoids associated with cultivated cereals in Middle East countries, covered many aspects of the biology and control of these insects. This report is concerned especially with the overwintering or resting period and certain aspects of the annual life-cycle and physiology of E. integriceps.

Up to now these aspects have been studied mainly in the U.S.S.R., and frequent reference has been made to this work. The main objective in the author's own research has been not to explore fresh fields but rather to ascertain whether conclusions reached by workers in Russia are applicable also in countries of the Middle East.

Typically, E. integriceps spends a relatively short active period in the cereal fields in spring and early summer, and the young adults of the new generation migrate in mid-summer to higher altitudes in the mountains, where they spend a few autumn months in aestivation, followed by a hibernation period during the cold months of late winter; they descend to the fields again in spring. A number of different overwintering areas were visited in Turkey, Iraq and Iran, and two were selected for special long-term studies; one was Karacadag mountain, near Diyarbakir in south-east Turkey, and the other Ghara-agadj mountain, in the Varamine district near Tehran, in Iran.

Some of the ecological characters of these areas were studied, including the vegetation and certain climatic factors; the latter included maximum and minimum temperatures and relative humidity, and were studied more intensively on Ghara-agadj. Special attention was given to the microclimatic conditions under the plants where the insects are actually situated.

Population density has been studied at observation stations at different altitudes in the overwintering areas. Two methods are described for estimating population density in terms of the number of insects per square metre. Certain plants are more suitable for shelter than others, and there is some evidence that different types of plants tend to be used more extensively for shelter in the aestivation and hibernation periods. The distribution of these plants affects local variations in population density.

Monthly estimates of density at different altitudes confirmed that there is a partial downward autumn migration which takes place in October on both Ghara-agadj and Karacadağ. Mortality was also estimated during these counts and found to be highest after aestivation, and to affect males more than females. This differential mortality, and also a difference in migratory behaviour between the sexes, brings about differences in the proportions of males and females at different times and in different places; an account has been given of the changes, both local and over-all, in sex ratio throughout the year, and in most cases the reasons for them can be understood.

Research has been carried out on certain aspects of the physiology of Eurygaster, with particular reference to the fat content and the condition of the internal organs (‘ morphofunctional condition ’) and the seasonal changes which they undergo during the year. Fat content has been extensively estimated by chemical analysis, and morphofunctional condition by dissection. The Russian method of forecasting the strength of invasions by reference to physiological condition is discussed; analysis of population changes on Ghara-agadj (where numbers were increasing) and on Karacadağ (where numbers were decreasing) suggests that the present work supports this system of forecasting in principle, provided it is maintained for long periods and the condition of the population kept under regular observation. Fat analysis has proved a more reliable method than dissection for assessing the physiological condition of the population. This condition is not in itself an adequate criterion for making forecasts, and a summary is given of other factors determining the future population density which should be taken into account.

Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 53 , Issue 3 , October 1962 , pp. 445 - 514
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achard, E. & Adle, A. H. (1927). Le “ souné ” ou “ sen ” (Eurygaster integriceps) et ses dégâts en Syrie et en Perse.—Conf, int. Blé 1927 repr. 46 pp. Rome, Inst. int. Agric.Google Scholar
Alexandrov, N. (1947–49). Eurygaster integriceps Put. à Varamine et ses parasites. [In Persian with French summary.]—Ent. Phytop. appl. no. 5 pp. 11–14, 29–41; no. 6–7 pp. 8–17, 28–47; no. 8 pp. 13–20, 16–52.Google Scholar
Alkan, B. (1952). Biologie, Schaeden und Bekaempfung von Getreidewanzen (Eurygaster integriceps Put. und Aelia rostrata Boh.) in der Turkei.— Trans. 9th int. Congr. Ent. 1 pp. 623–626.Google Scholar
Andrejev, S. B., Vsevodin, A. V., Molchanova, C. A. & Khotjanovitch, (1958). Some results of the use of tracer technique in the study of plant protection.—2nd U.N. International Conference on the Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy (English translation) pp. 18–26.Google Scholar
Arnol'di, K. V. (1955). Hibernation of Eurygaster integriceps Put. in the mountains of Kuban in the light of investigations in 1949–53. [In Russian.]—In Fedotov, D. M. Ed. Eurygaster integriceps 3 pp. 171–237.Google Scholar
Ballard, E. & Evans, M. G. (1928). Dysdercus sidae, Montr., in Queensland.— Bull. ent. Res. 18 pp. 405–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biryukova, A. G. (1960). Variation in the morphofunctional state of the noxious Pentatomid (Eurygaster integriceps Put.) for 1954–57 in the Krasnodar region. [In Russian.]—In Fedotov, D. M. Ed. Eurygaster integriceps 4 pp. 142–156.Google Scholar
Brown, E. S. (1962). Laboratory experiments on certain aspects of the feeding of young adult Eurygaster integriceps Put. (Hemiptera, Scutelleridae) in Iran.—Ent. exp. appl. 5 pp. 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, E. S. & Eralp, M. (1962). The distribution of species of Eurygaster Lap. (Hemiptera, Scutelleridae) in Middle East countries.—Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (13) 5 pp. 65–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullmann, O. & Faber, W. (1958). Studien zum Getreidewanzenproblem.— Pflanzenschutzberichte 20 pp. 33–160.Google Scholar
Common, I. F. B. (1952). Migration and gregarious aestivation in the bogong moth, Agrotis infusa.—Nature, Lond. 170 pp. 981–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Defago, G. (1937). Observations sur les punaises des céréales en Suisse.—Bull. Murith. 54 pp. 94–136.Google Scholar
Fedotov, D. M. Ed. (1947–1960). The noxious Pentatomid, Eurygaster integriceps Put. Vols. I–IV. [In Russian.]—Vol. I, 272 pp., 1947; Vol. II, 271 pp., 1947; Vol. III, 278 pp., 1955; Vol. IV, 239 pp., 1960. Moscow, Akad. Nauk SSSR.Google Scholar
Fedotov, D. M. (1947a). Organic modification of the internal structure of the adult Eurygaster integriceps during the year. [In Russian.]—In Fedotov, D. M. Ed. Eurygaster integriceps 1 pp. 35–80.Google Scholar
Fedotov, D. M. (1947b). The state of Eurygaster integriceps in periods of reduced infestations. [In Russian.]—In Fedotov, D. M. Ed. Eurygaster integriceps 2 pp. 3–18.Google Scholar
Fedotov, D. M. (1949). The method of forecasting the abundance of the noxious Pentatomid by its internal condition. [In Russian.]—Dokl. vsesoyuz. Akad. sel.-khoz. Nauk Lenina 14 no. 9 pp. 8–15.Google Scholar
Fedotov, D. M. (1954). Forecasts of the abundance of the noxious Pentatomid. [In Russian.]—24 pp. Moscow, Inst. Morf. Zhiv. Severtsova, Akad. Nauk SSSR.Google Scholar
Fedotov, D. M. & Bocharova, O. M. (1955). The dependence of the morphofunctional condition of the noxious Pentatomid (Eurygaster integriceps Put.) on the conditions of life. [In Russian.]—In Fedotov, D. M. Ed. Eurygaster integriceps 3 pp. 7–67.Google Scholar
Hibraoui, M. (1930). Contribution à l'étude biologique et systématique de Eurygaster integriceps Put. en Syrie.—Rev. Path. vég. 17 pp. 97–160.Google Scholar
Janjua, N. A., Mustafa, A. M. & Nur-Ul-Hassan, Khan (1950). The biology and control of the wheat bug, Eurygaster maura Linn., in Baluchistan.— Indian J. Ent. 9 pp. 73–83.Google Scholar
Jourdan, M. L. (1955). Les punaises du blé.—Mémento Serv. Déf. Vég. Maroc no. 64, 18 pp.Google Scholar
Lodos, N. (1961). Türkiye, Irak, Iran ve Suriye'de süne (Eurygaster integriceps Put.) problemi üzerinde incelemeler.—Ege Üniv. Zir. Fak. Yayin. no. 51, 115 pp.Google Scholar
Manninger, G. A. (1950). A rovarprognozis jelentösege és lehetöségei a gabonapoloskák (Eurygaster, Aelia fajok) példáján szemléltetve.—Ann. Fac. Agron. Univ. Agric. Budapest 1 pp. 117–129.Google Scholar
Nizamlioğlu, K. (1955a). Süne'nin salgn yapma sebepleri üzerine yeni açlklamalar ve Diyarbakir-Urfa bölgesinde süne.…—Koruma Tarim Ilâçlan A.Ş. Neşr. no. 4, 26 pp.Google Scholar
Nizamlioğlu, K. (1955b). Recent details on the epidemiology of Eurygaster integriceps Put. and on the epidemiology, ecology of Eurygaster integriceps as well as on its control in 1955 in the districts of Diyarbakir/Urfa. (Abstract.)—Tomurcuk 4 no. 46 p. 6.Google Scholar
Peredel'skiĭ, A. A. (1947). Biological foundations of the theory and practice of the control of Eurygaster integriceps Put. [In Russian.]—In Fedotov, D. M. Ed. Eurygaster integriceps 2 pp. 89–270.Google Scholar
Pruthi, H. S. (1943). A new important pest of wheat crop in India.—Indian J. agric. Sci. 13 pp. 232–234.Google Scholar
Samuel, C. K. (1949). Notes on Eurygaster maura Linn. (Pentatomidae), pest of wheat crop in India, with keys to its varieties and to the species of Eurygaster Linn.—Indian J. Ent. 8 pp. 174–177.Google Scholar
Shumakov, E. M. & Vinogradova, N. M. (1958). The ecology of E. integriceps. [In Russian.]—Trud. vsesoyuz. Inst. Zashch. Rast. 9 pp. 19–71.Google Scholar
Strogaya, G. M. (1955). The significance of some biochemical components in the individual development of Eurygaster integriceps Put. [In Russian.]— In Fedotov, D. M. Ed. Eurygaster integriceps 3 pp. 68–133.Google Scholar
Strogaya, G. M. (1960). The physiological state of the noxious Pentatomid (Eurygaster integriceps Put.) in various overwintering sites in the Krasnodar region. [In Russian.]—In Fedotov, D. M. Ed. Eurygaster integriceps 4 pp. 125–141.Google Scholar
Tischler, W. (1937). Untersuchungen über Wanzen an Getreide.—Arb. physiol. angew. Ent. Berl. 4 pp. 193–231.Google Scholar
Tischler, W. (1938). Zur Oekologie der wichtigsten in Deutschland an Getreide schädlichen Pentatomiden. I.—Z. Morph. Ökol. Tiere 34 pp. 317–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tischler, W. (1939a). Zur Oekologie der wichtigsten in Deutschland an Getreide schädlichen Pentatomiden. II.— Z. Morph. Ökol. Tiere 35 pp. 251–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tischler, W. (1939b). Schaden und Bekämpfung der Getreideschädlichen Blattwanzen.—Arb. physiol. angew. Ent. Berl. 6 pp. 14–32.Google Scholar
Ushatinskaya, R. S. (1955). The physiological peculiarities of Eurygaster integriceps Put., in the quiescent period under conditions of hibernation in the mountains and on flat ground. [In Russian.]—In Fedotov, D. M. Ed. Eurygaster integriceps 3 pp. 134–170.Google Scholar
Viktorov, G. A. (1960). Factors in the dynamics of numbers of the noxious Pentatomid Eurygaster integriceps Put. in the Kuban in 1956–58. [In Russian.]—In Fedotov, D. M. Ed. Eurygaster integriceps 4 pp. 222–236.Google Scholar
Vinogradova, N. M. & Shumakov, E. M. (1958). Methods of investigation and forecasting of Eurygaster integriceps. [In Russian.]—In Kosov, V. V. & Polyakov, I. Ya. Ed. Forecasting the appearance and abundance of pests and diseases of agricultural crops, pp. 256–265. Moscow, Minist. sel.-khoz. Soyuza SSR.Google Scholar
Vodjdani, S. (1954). Contribution à l'étude des punaises des céréales et en particulier d'Eurygaster integriceps Put. (Hemiptera, Pentatomidae, Scutellerinae).—Ann. Êpiphyt. 5 pp. 105–160.Google Scholar
Voegelé, J. (1960). Inventaire des espèces de punaises des genres Aelia et Eurygaster existant au Maroc, basé sur l'étude du squelette génital.— Cah. Rech. agron. no. 10 pp. 5–26.Google Scholar
Webster, J. F. & Dutt, A. [1926]. Sunn pest (Ergaija) on cereals in Iraq.— Agric. Leafl. Dep. Agric. Iraq no. 13, 8 pp.Google Scholar
Williams, C. B. (1958). Insect migration.—235 pp. London, Collins.Google Scholar
Yüksel, M. (1958). Biology, ecology and control of senn pest, Eurygaster integriceps, in Turkey (1955/56).—Höfchen-Briefe 11 no. 1 pp. 25–36.Google Scholar
Zwölfer, W. (1930). Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Schädlingsfauna Kleinasiens. I. Untersuchungen zur Epidemiologie der Getreidewanze Eurygaster integriceps Put. (Hemipt. Het.).—Z. angew. Ent. 17 pp. 227–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwölfer, W. (1932). Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Schädlingsfauna Kleinasiens. II. Über die Beziehungen der Getreidewanze Eurygaster integriceps Put. zu biotischen Umweltfaktoren. (Nebst Bemerkungen über deren praktische Verwertbarkeit.)—Z. angew. Ent. 19 pp. 161–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar