Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:53:48.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Recent changes in reproductive phenology of a K-selected aquatic insect predator, Belostoma flumineum Say (Heteroptera, Belostomatidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 April 2018

S.L. Kight ,
G.L. Coffey ,
A.W. Tanner ,
M.P. Dmytriw ,
S.L. Tedesco ,
J. Hoang  and
A.K. Aboagye
S.L. Kight*
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Montclair State University, Montclair, NJ 07043, USA
G.L. Coffey
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Montclair State University, Montclair, NJ 07043, USA
A.W. Tanner
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Montclair State University, Montclair, NJ 07043, USA
M.P. Dmytriw
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Montclair State University, Montclair, NJ 07043, USA
S.L. Tedesco
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Montclair State University, Montclair, NJ 07043, USA
J. Hoang
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Montclair State University, Montclair, NJ 07043, USA
A.K. Aboagye
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Montclair State University, Montclair, NJ 07043, USA
*
*Author for correspondence Phone: +1 973 655 5426 Fax: +1 973 655 7047 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The timing of critical events like mating, migration, and development has noticeably and recently shifted in many populations of diverse organisms. Here, we report a change in the breeding phenology of giant waterbugs, Belostoma flumineum Say (Heteroptera, Belostomatidae), in the northeastern United States. Waterbugs collected in 2005 and 2006 exhibited previously typical patterns of mating and reproduction: two annual reproductive peaks in which overwintered adults mated in the spring and young adults from a new generation mated in the fall. In 2012 and 2015, despite similar sampling effort, we detected no fall breeding activity in the study area. Reproductive behaviour under controlled laboratory conditions was also different between the earlier (2005 and 2006) and recent (2012 and 2015) years: waterbugs collected in recent years exhibited significant delays in reproduction (>30 days) under similar photoperiod and thermal conditions. We discuss potential causes of this dramatic change in reproductive behaviour, such as climate change, as well as possible negative impacts of the absence of fall reproduction on populations of B. flumineum in the study region.

Keywords

Belostoma flumineumBelostomatidaephenologyreproduction
Type
Research Papers
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 109 , Issue 1 , February 2019 , pp. 84 - 89
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boggs, C.L. (2016) The fingerprints of global climate change on insect populations. Current Opinion in Insect Science 17, 69–73.Google Scholar
Both, C., Van Asch, M., Bijlsma, R.G., Van Den Burg, A.B. & Visser, M.E. (2009) Climate change and unequal phenological changes across four trophic levels: constraints or adaptations? Journal of Animal Ecology 78, 73–83.Google Scholar
Bradley, N.L., Leopold, A.C., Ross, J. & Huffaker, W. (1999) Phenological changes reflect climate change in Wisconsin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 96, 9701–9704.Google Scholar
Brown, C.J., O'Connor, M.I., Poloczanska, E.S., Schoeman, D.S., Buckley, L.B., Burrows, M.T., Duarte, C.M., Halpern, B.S., Pandolfi, J.M., Parmesan, C. & Richardson, A.J. (2016) Ecological and methodological drivers of species’ distribution and phenology responses to climate change. Global Change Biology 22, 1548–1560.Google Scholar
Buckley, L.B., Nufio, C.R., Kirk, E.M. & Kingsolver, J.G. (2015) Elevational differences in developmental plasticity determine phenological responses of grasshoppers to recent climate warming. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 282, 20150441.Google Scholar
Canziani, O.F., Palutikof, J.P., van der Linden, P.J. & Hanson, C.E. (2007) Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (Vol. 4). in Parry, M.L., Canziani, O.F., Palutikof, J.P., van der Linden, P.J. & Hanson, C.E. (Eds). Assessment of observed changes and responses in natural and managed systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 79–132.Google Scholar
Cotton, P.A. (2003) Avian migration phenology and global climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100, 12219–12222.Google Scholar
Faccoli, M. (2009) Effect of weather on Ips typographus (Coleoptera Curculionidae) phenology, voltinism, and associated spruce mortality in the southeastern Alps. Environmental Entomology 38, 307–316.Google Scholar
Flenner, I. & Sahlén, G. (2008) Dragonfly community re-organisation in boreal forest lakes: rapid species turnover driven by climate change? Insect Conservation and Diversity 1, 169–179.Google Scholar
Flosi, J.W. (1980) The population biology of the giant water bug Belostoma flumineum Say (Hemiptera: Belostomatidae). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. Paper 7326. Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.Google Scholar
Gilg, M.R. (1996) The relationship of catalase activity to the trade-off between reproduction and lifespan in the giant waterbug, Belostoma flumineum. Master's thesis, Eastern Illinois University, Charleston, Illinois, USA.Google Scholar
Gilg, M.R. & Kruse, K.C. (2003) Reproduction decreases life span in the giant waterbug (Belostoma flumineum). The American Midland Naturalist 149, 306–319.Google Scholar
Gill, J.A., Alves, J.A., Sutherland, W.J., Appleton, G.F., Potts, P.M. & Gunnarsson, T.G. (2014) Why is timing of bird migration advancing when individuals are not? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 281, 20132161.Google Scholar
Gordo, O. & Sanz, J.J. (2005) Phenology and climate change: a long-term study in a Mediterranean locality. Oecologia 146, 484–495.Google Scholar
Harrington, R., Clark, S.J., Weltham, S.J., Virrier, P.J., Denhol, C.H., Hullé, M., Maurice, D., Rounsevell, M.D. & Cocu, N. (2007) Environmental change and the phenology of European aphids. Global Change Biology 13, 1556–1565.Google Scholar
Hassall, C., Thompson, D.J., French, G.C. & Harvey, I.F. (2007) Historical changes in the phenology of British Odonata are related to climate. Global Change Biology 13, 1556–1565.Google Scholar
Hughes, L. (2000) Biological consequences of global warming: is the signal already apparent? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15, 56–61.Google Scholar
Kight, S.L. & Kruse, K.C. (1992) Factors affecting the allocation of paternal care in waterbugs (Belostoma flumineum Say). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 30, 409–414.Google Scholar
Kight, S.L., Sprague, J., Kruse, K.C. & Johnson, L. (1995) Are egg-bearing male water bugs, Belostoma flumineum Say (Hemiptera: Belostomatidae), impaired swimmers? Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 68, 468–470.Google Scholar
Kight, S.L., Batino, M. & Zhang, Z. (2000) Temperature-dependent parental investment in the giant waterbug Belostoma flumineum (Heteroptera: Belostomatidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 93, 340–342.Google Scholar
Kight, S.L., Steelman, L., Coffey, G., Lucente, J. & Castillo, M. (2008) Evidence of population-level lateralized behaviour in giant waterbugs, Belostoma flumineum Say (Heteroptera: Belostomatidae): T-maze turning is left biased. Behavioural Processes 79, 66–69.Google Scholar
Kight, S.L., Tanner, A.W. & Coffey, G.L. (2011) Termination of brooding in male giant waterbugs is associated with season, egg pad size, and presence of females. Invertebrate Reproduction and Development 55, 197–204.Google Scholar
Kruse, K.C. (1990) Male backspace availability in the male giant waterbug Belostoma flumineum Say. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 26, 281–289.Google Scholar
Lauck, D.R. & Menke, A.S. (1961) The higher classification of the Belostomatidae (Hemiptera). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 54, 644–657.Google Scholar
Menzel, A., Sparks, T.H., Estrella, N., Kochz, E., Aasa, A., Ahas, R., Alm-Kubler, K., Bissollik, P., Braslavska, O., Briede, A., Chmielewskizz, F.M., Crepinsek, Z., Curnel, Y., Dahl, A., Defila, C., Donnelly, A., Filella, Y., Jatczak, K., Mage, F., Mestre, A., Nordli, O., Penuelas, J., Pirinen, P., Remisova, V., Scheifingerz, H., Striz, M., Susnik, A., Van Vliet, A.J.H., Wielgolaski, F., Zach, S. & Zust, A. (2006) European phenological response to climate change matches the warming pattern. Global Change Biology 12, 1969–1976.Google Scholar
Moyes, K., Nussey, D.H., Clements, M.N., Guinness, F.E., Morris, A., Morris, S, Pemberton, J.M., Kruuk, L.E.B. & Clutton-Brock, T.H. (2011) Advancing breeding phenology in response to environmental change in a wild red deer population. Global Change Biology 17, 2455–2469.Google Scholar
Musolin, D.L. (2007) Insects in a warmer world: ecological, physiological and life-history responses of true bugs (Heteroptera) to climate change. Global Change Biology 13, 1565–1585.Google Scholar
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (2017) Climate Change in New Jersey: Temperature, Precipitation, Extreme Events and sea Level. Environmental Trends Report. NJDEP, Division of Science, Research, and Environmental Health, Trenton, New Jersey, USA, pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
Ohba, S., Miyasaka, H. & Nakasuji, F. (2008) The role of amphibian prey in the diet and growth of giant water bug nymphs in Japanese rice fields. Population Ecology 50, 9–16.Google Scholar
Ovaskainen, O., Skorokhodova, S., Yakovleva, M., Sukhov, A., Kutenkov, A., Kutenkova, N., Shcherbakov, A., Meyke, E. & del Mar Delgado, M. (2013) Community-level phenological response to climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110, 13434–13439.Google Scholar
Primack, R.B., Ibáñez, I., Higuchi, H., Lee, S.D., Miller-Rushing, A.J., Wilson, A.M. & Silander, J.A. Jr. (2009) Spatial and interspecific variability in phenological responses to warming temperatures. Biological Conservation 142, 2569–2577.Google Scholar
Qu, J., Yang, M., Li, W., Chen, Q., Mi, Z., Xu, W. & Zhang, Y. (2016) Effects of climate change on the reproduction and offspring sex ratio of plateau pika (Ochotona curzoniae) on the Tibetan Plateau. Journal of Arid Environments 134, 66–72.Google Scholar
Richardson, A.D., Keenan, T.F., Migliavacca, M., Ryu, Y., Sonnentag, O. & Toomey, M. (2013) Climate change, phenology, and phenological control of vegetation feedbacks to the climate system. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 169, 156–173.Google Scholar
Rosenzweig, C., Karoly, D., Vicarelli, M., Neofotis, P., Wu, Q., Casassa, G., Menzel, A., Root, T.L., Estrella, N., Seguin, B. & Tryjanowski, P. (2008) Attributing physical and biological impacts to anthropogenic climate change. Nature 453, 353–357.Google Scholar
Roy, D.B. & Sparks, T.H. (2000) Phenology of British butterflies and climate change. Global Change Biology 6, 407–416.Google Scholar
Schmitz, O.J. & Barton, B.T. (2014) Climate change effects on behavioral and physiological ecology of predator–prey interactions: implications for conservation biological control. Biological Control 75, 87–96.Google Scholar
Schwartz, M.D., Ahas, R. & Aasa, A. (2006) Onset of spring starting earlier across the Northern Hemisphere. Global Change Biology 12, 343–351.Google Scholar
Sgrò, C.M., Terblanche, J.S. & Hoffmann, A.A. (2016) What can plasticity contribute to insect responses to climate change? Annual Review of Entomology 61, 433–451.Google Scholar
Smith, R.L. (1980) Evolution of exclusive postcopulatory paternal care in the insects. The Florida Entomologist 63, 65–78.Google Scholar
Thackeray, S.J., Henrys, P.A., Hemming, D., Bell, J.R., Botham, M.S., Burthe, S., Helaouet, P., Johns, D.G., Jones, I.D., Leech, D.I. & Mackay, E.B. (2016) Phenological sensitivity to climate across taxa and trophic levels. Nature 535, 241–245.Google Scholar
Torre Bueno, J.R.D.L. (1906) Life-histories of North American water-bugs. The Canadian Entomologist 38, 242–252.Google Scholar
Tulp, I. & Schekkerman, H. (2008) Has prey availability for arctic birds advanced with climate change? Hindcasting the abundance of tundra arthropods using weather and seasonal variation. Arctic 61, 48–60.Google Scholar
Visser, M.E. & Holleman, L.J.M. (2001) Warmer springs disrupt the synchrony of oak and winter moth phenology. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B – Biological Sciences 268, 289–294.Google Scholar
Voigt, W., Perner, J., Davis, A., Eggers, T., Schumacher, J., Bahrmann, R., Fabian, B., Heinrich, W., Kohler, G., Lichter, D., Marstaller, R. & Sander, F. (2003) Trophic levels are differentially sensitive to climate. Ecology 84, 2444–2453.Google Scholar
Walther, G.R., Post, E., Convey, P., Menzel, A., Parmesan, C., Beebee, T.J.C., Fromentin, J.M., Hoegh-Guldberg, O. & Bairlein, F. (2002) Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 416, 389–395.Google Scholar