Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:51:44.174Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reactions of Insects to the Olfactory Stimuli from the Components of an Insecticidal Spray

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

B. Hocking  and
I. S. Lindsay
B. Hocking
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Alberta
I. S. Lindsay
Affiliation:
Defence Research Board, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Two kinds of equipment for measuring the reactions of insects to the olfactory stimuli provided by some common components of insecticidal sprays are described. One of these, consisting of a T-tube carrying a current of odorous air across the top and admitting insects up the stem, is new, can be used in the field, and gives rapid and reproducible evaluations. Tests with several species of Diptera showed that technical DDT, diesel fuel oil, and an auxiliary solvent containing methylated naphthalenes are all strongly repellent or contain strongly repellent components. Related species gave similar results with the two kinds of equipment. House-flies (Musca domestica L.) resistant to DDT were less sensitive than normal house-flies. The implications of these findings are discussed.

Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 49 , Issue 4 , December 1958 , pp. 675 - 683
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon. (1954). How to spray the aircraft way.—Fmrs' Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric., no. 2062, 32 pp.Google Scholar
Brennan, J. M. & Harwood, R. F. (1953). A preliminary report on the laboratory colonization of the mosquito, Culex tarsalis Coquillett.—Mosq. News, 13, pp. 153–157.Google Scholar
Danzer, A. (1956). Die Duftorientierung von Geotrupes silvaticus im natürlichen Biotop.—Z. vergl. Physiol., 39, pp. 76–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dethier, V. G. (1947). Chemical insect attractants and repellents.—289 pp. Philadelphia, Pa., Blakiston.Google Scholar
Dethier, V. G. (1957). Chemoreception and the behavior of insects.—Surv. biol. Progr., 3, pp. 149–183.Google ScholarPubMed
Fisher, R. S. & Morrison, F. O. (1950). Methods of rearing and sexing Musca domestica L.—80th Rep. ent. Soc. Ont. 1949, pp. 41–45.Google Scholar
Flügge, C. (1934). Geruchliche Raumorientierung von Drosophila melanogaster.—Z. vergl. Physiol., 20, pp. 463–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gahan, J. B., Travis, B. V., Morton, F. A. & Lindquist, A. W. (1945). DDT as a residual-type treatment to control Anopheles quadrimaculatus: practical tests.—J. econ. Ent., 38, pp. 231–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, J. S. (1940). The visual responses of flying mosquitoes.—Proc. zool. Soc. Lond., (A) 109, pp. 221–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, J. S. (1947). The excitant and repellent effects on mosquitos of sublethal contacts with DDT.—Bull. ent. Res., 37, pp. 593–607.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwinck, I. (1954). Experimentelle Untersuchungen über Geruchssinn und Strömungswahrnehmung in der Orientierung bei Nachtschmetterlingen.—Z. vergl. Physiol., 37, pp. 19–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trembley, H. L. (1955). Mosquito culture techniques and experimental procedures.—Bull. Amer. Mosq. Contr. Ass., no. 3, 73 pp.Google Scholar
Warnke, G. (1931). Experimentelle Untersuchungen über den Geruchssinn von Geotrupes silvaticus Panz. und Geotrupes vernalis Lin.—Z. vergl. Physiol., 14, pp. 121–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wieting, J. O. G. & Hoskins, W. M. (1939). The olfactory responses of flies in a new type of insect olfactometer. II.—J. econ. Ent., 32, pp. 24–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar