Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:46:28.571Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Parasites of the Moth-Borers of Sugar-cane in Mauritius

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

L. Andre Moutia  and
Claude. M. Courtois
L. Andre Moutia
Affiliation:
Associate Entomologist
Claude. M. Courtois
Affiliation:
Technical Assistant, Department of Agriculture, Mauritius.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There are three moth-borers of sugar-cane in Mauritius, Proceras sacchariphagus Boj. (Crambid.), Sesamia vuteria (Stoll) (Agrotid.) and Olethreutes schistaceana (Snell.) (Olethreutid.).

The eggs of all three are parasitised by Trichogramma sp. ? australicum Gir., while a second undetermined species of Trichogramma parasitises the eggs of Sesamia and Olethreutes. Sesamia eggs are also parasitised by a Scelionid, Platytelenomus sp. ? hylas Nixon.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 43 , Issue 2 , July 1952 , pp. 325 - 359
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1952

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon. (1928). Insects injurious to sugar–cane in Formosa. —Abstracts Works Sugar Expt. Station, Formosa, pp. 272–294. Taihoku, Dept. Agric. Govt. Res. Inst. Formosa. (R.A.E. (A) 16, p. 481).Google Scholar
Allman, S. L.. (1927). The Codling Moth(Cydia pomonella, L.). — Agric.Gaz.N.S.W. 38, pp. 51–556, 624–631, 699–706, 861–872. (R.A.E. (A) 16, p.101).Google Scholar
Bedford, H. W.. (1935). Entomological Section Agricultural Research Serivce. Report on work 1934–35. Rep. agric. Res. Serv. Sudan, 1935, pp. 63–96. (R.A.E. (A) 25, p. 215).Google Scholar
Bell, A. F..(1934). Report of the Division of Entomology and Pathology. — Rep. Bur. Sug. Exp. Stas Qd.. 34, pp. 50–72. (R.A.E. (A) 23, P. 265).Google Scholar
Bhatnagar, S. P.. (1950). Studies on Apanteles Förster (Vipionidae: parasitic Hymenoptera) from India. —Indian J. Ent. 10, pp. 133–+203.Google Scholar
Bordage, E.. (1898). Les Ichneumonides destructeurs des borers de la canne à sucre. — Rev.Agric.. Réunion, 2, pp. 521–527.Google Scholar
Bradley, W. G., & Burgess, E. D.. (1934). The biology of cremastus flavoorbitalis, Cameron, and chneumonid parasite of the European Corn Borer. — Tech. Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric. no. 441, 15 pp.Google Scholar
Cameron, P.. (1891). Hymenopterological notices. I. On some Hymenoptera parasitic on Indian injurious insects. — Mem. Manchr phil. Soc.. (4) 4, pp. 182–186.Google Scholar
Cartwright, W. B.. (1933). Observations on the European Corn Borer and its major parasites in the Orient. — Circ. U.S. Dep. Agric. no. 289, 13 pp.Google Scholar
Corbett, G. H.. & Miller, N. C. E.. (1933). A list of insects with their parasites and predators in Malaya. — Sci. Ser. Dep. Agric. S.S. & F.M.S.. no. 13. 15 pp. (R.A.E. (A) 21, p. 676).Google Scholar
d'EmmerezdeCharmoy, D.. (1917). Moth–borers affecting sugar–cane in Mauritius. — Bull.Dep. Agric. Mauritius, Sci. Ser.. no. 5, 27 pp.(R.A.E. (a) 5, P. 440).Google Scholar
d'EmmerezdeCharmoy, A.. (1921). Insect pests of various minor crops and fruit trees in Mauritius.— Bull. ent. Res. 12, pp. 181–190. (R.A.E. (A) 9, p. 559).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diakonoff, A.. (1948). Enkele algemeene problemen in verband met het vraagstuk van stengelboorders van het suikerriet op Java en hun parasieten. — Chron. Nat.. 104, pp. 230–236. (Biol. Abstr. 24, p. 731).Google Scholar
FerriËre, C.. (1933). Chalcidoid and Proctotrupoid parasites of pests of the coconut palm.— Stylops, 2, pp. 97–108.Google Scholar
Frappa, C.. (1935). Les insectes nuisibles à la canne à sucre à Madagascar. — Bull.écon. Madagascar, N.S.. no. 3, pp. 221–230 (R.A.E. (A) 26, pp. 66).Google Scholar
Fullaway, D. T.. (1930). Report of the Entomologist. 1929. — Hawaii. For. Agric. 27, pp. 45–50. (R.A.E. (A) 19, p. 11.)Google Scholar
Girault, A. A.. (1912). Australian Hymenoptera Chalcidoidea I. The family Trichogrammatidae with descriptions of new genera and species. — Mem.Qd Mus.. 1, pp. 66–116.Google Scholar
Girault, A. A.. (1914). Notes on the Hymenoptera, Trichogrammatidae and Mymaridae. — Canad. Ent.. 46, pp. 327–330. (R.A.E. (A) 3, P. 26).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaac, P. V.. (1940). Report of the Second Entomologist (Dipterist) in charge of Scheme for Research on Insect Pests of Sugar Cane. — Sci. Rep. agric. Res. Inst. New Delhi, 1938–39, pp. 134–135. Delhi, 1940. (R.A.E. (A) 29, p. 184.)Google Scholar
Ishii, T.. (1938). On the Japanese species and the biology of Trichogramma. In Japanese. —Oyo-Dobuts. Zasshi, 10, pp. 139–141. (R.A.E. (A) 26, p. 671).Google Scholar
Jardine, N. K.. (1918). Special investigation into Tea Tortrix. — Ceylon Adm.Rep. Agric.. 1917, pp. C13–C15. (R.A.E. (A) 6, p. 540).Google Scholar
Jepson, W. F.. (1939). Entomological Division. — Rep. Dep. Agric Mauritius, 1938, pp. 40–51.Google Scholar
Jepson, W. F.. (1941). Entomologicla Division. — Rep. Dep. Agric. Mauritius, 1939, pp. 16–19.Google Scholar
Jepson, W. F.. & Moutia, L. A.. (1939). The progress of applied entomology in Mauritius during the years 1933 to 1938, with reference to insects of the sugarcane. — Proc. int. Soc. Sug. Cane Tech.. 6, pp. 337–382.Google Scholar
Moutia, L.A.. (1934). The Sugar–cane Moth Borers in Mauritius. — Bull ent. Res.. 25, pp. 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moutia, A.. (1948). Entomological Division. — Rep. Dep. Agric. Mauritius, 1947, pp. 43–50.Google Scholar
Moutia, A.. & Mamet, R.. (1945). A review of twenty–five years of economic entomology in the Island of Mauritius. — Bull. ent. Res.. 36, pp. 439–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moutia, L. A.. & Mamet, R.. (1947). An annotated list of insects and Acarina of economic importance in Mauritius. — Bull. Dep. Agric. Mauritius, Sci. Ser. no. 29, 43 pp.Google Scholar
Nixon, G.E.. (1935). A revision of the African telenominae (Proctotrupoidea, fam. Scelionidae). — Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond., 83, pp. 73–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagden, H.T.. (1930). A preliminary account of three Rice Stem borers. — Sci.Ser. Dep. Agric. S.S. &F.M.S. no. 1, 30 pp.(R.A.E. (A) 18, p. 655.)Google Scholar
Seyrig, A.. (1932). Les Ichneumonides de Madagascar. I. Ichneumonidae. Pimplinae. — Mém. Acad. malgache, 11, 183 pp.Google Scholar
Sonan, J.. (1929). A few host–known Ichneumonidae found in Formosa. —Trans. nat. Hist. Soc. Formosa, 19, pp. 415–425. (R.A.E. (A) 18, p. 8.)Google Scholar
Takano, S.. (1933). On the methods of artificial multiplication and liberation of Trichogramma spp. In Japanese.— Dobuts. Zasshi, 45, pp. 132–134. (R.A.E. (A) 21, P. 359).Google Scholar
Takano, S.. (1934). Hymenopterous parasites of Lepidopterous pests of sugarcane in Formosa and their bibliography. — J.Formosan Sur. PL. Ass. 11, pp. 454–466. (R.A.E. (A) 22, p. 521).Google Scholar
Takano, S.. & Yanagihara, M.. (1939). Researches on injurious and beneficial insects and other injurious animals of sugar–cane. In Japanese.—Sur.Exp.Sta. extra Rep. no. 2, 311 pp. Tainan, Formosa. (R.A.E. (A) 27, p. 363).Google Scholar
Van der Goot, P.. (1915). Over boorderparasieten en boorderbestrijding. — Meded. Proefst. Java–Suikerind. Landb.Ser.. 5, pp. 125–176. (R.A.E. (A) 3, p. 382.)Google Scholar
Van der Goot, P.. (1925). Levenswijze en bestrijiding van den witten rijstboorder op Java. — Meded. Inst. Plziekt. no. 66, 308pp. (R.A.E. (A) 13, P. 466).Google Scholar
Van Dine, D.L.. (1929). Parasites of Sugar Cane moth Borers. — J. econ. Ent.. 22, pp. 248–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinson, J.. (1942). Biological control of Diatraea mauriciella, Wlk. in Mauritius. I. Investigations in Ceylon in 1939. — Bull. ent. Res. 33, pp. 39–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, C.. (1932). A revision of Braconid species parasitic in the injurious insects of rice–plant and sugar–cane in Japan and Formosa. — Trans. Sapporo nat. Hist. Soc. 12, pp. 63–72. (R.A.E. (A) 20, p. 606).Google Scholar
Waterston, J.. (1915). Notes on African Chalcidoidea (III). — Bull. ent. Res.. 6, pp. 231–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, D. S.. (1928). A revision of the Indo–Australian species of the genus Apanteles (Hym. Bracon.) Part I. — Bull. ent. Res. 19, pp. 79–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, D. S.. (1930). New species and host records of Ichneumonidae and Braconidae. — Bull. ent. Res. 21, pp. 147–158. (R.A.E. (A) 18, P. 635).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. R.. (1949). Entomological Division. — Rep. Dep. Agric. Mauritius, 1948, pp. 63–69.Google Scholar
Williams, J. R.. (1951a). Entomological Division. —Rep. Dep. Agric. Mauritius, 1949, pp. 59–66.Google Scholar
Williams, J. R.. (1951b). The bionomics and morphology of Brentia leptocosma Meyrick (Lep. Glyhipterygidae). — Bull. ent. Res. 41, pp. 629–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar