Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:07:53.518Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Observations on the dispersal of larvae of the cattle tick Boophilus microplus (Can.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

I. J. Lewis
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, Cattle Tick Research Station, Wollongbar, New South Wales

Extract

Dispersal of the larvae of the cattle tick Boophilus microplus (Can.) was studied in connection with problems of controlling and eradicating this pest and bovine babesiosis in New South Wales. Larval ticks were recovered by pressing flannelette-covered boards on to the pasture or litter surface, or sampling with cattle. Many of these larvae were capable of completing parasitic development.

Strong winds were an important factor in determining the distance travelled, as the longest journeys in pasture were for the most part in the directions in which the larvae would have been carried by recorded strong winds. Much of the dispersal is accomplished when larvae are transferred from one grass blade to another moving in the wind, but a great number of airborne larvae were captured on tanglefoot-covered traps. Movement by wind was clearly demonstrated over short pasture, up to 100 ft and possibly as far as 260 ft from the point of hatching. In long grass one larva travelled 83 ft, but in scrub and forest the greatest distance travelled was 15 ft. Many larvae that travelled long distances were capable of completing development on cattle.

Tick larvae could be transported by casual hosts and then dropped in a viable condition. A horse carried larvae for 900 ft, a rat and cockerels 100 ft, a magpie in flight 600 ft, and a pigeon in flight half a mile. A horse dipped six days earlier in ethion dropped live and viable larvae after transporting them 150 ft.

Security has been improved against the movement of larvae from the Cattle Tick Research Station, Wollongbar, New South Wales, to neighbouring properties, and from Queensland into New South Wales, by widening existing buffer zones to 330 ft. Inspectoral staff are now required to spray themselves and their horses before re-entering New South Wales from the buffer zone.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Calaby, J. H. (1966). Mammals of the Upper Richmond and Clarence rivers, New South Wales.—Tech. Pap. Wildl. Serv. Sect. C.S.I.R.O. Aust. no. 10, 55 pp.Google Scholar
Evans, G. O. (1950). Studies on the bionomics of the sheep ked, Melophagus ovinus, L., in west Wales.—Bull. ent. Res. 40, 459478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hitchcock, L. F. (1955). Studies on the non-parasitic stages of the cattle tick, Boophilus microplus (Canestrini).—Aust. J. Zool. 3, 295311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Jesus, Z. (1934). The life history of the Australian cattle tick under Philippine conditions.—Philipp. J. Anim. Ind. 1, 355369.Google Scholar
McCulloch, R. N. & Lewis, I. J. (1970). Ecological studies of the cattle tick (Boophilus microplus (Can.)) in the North Coast District of New South Wales.—Aust. J. Agric. Res. 19, 698710.Google Scholar
Mackerras, I. M., Waterhouse, D. F., Maiden, A. C. B. & Edgar, G. (1961). The cattle tick problem in New South Wales.—Sci. Bull. Dep. Agric. N.S.W. no. 78, 100 pp.Google Scholar
Roulston, W. J. & Wharton, R. H. (1967). Acaricide tests on the Biarra strain of organophosphorus resistant cattle tick Boophilus microplus from southern Queensland.—Aust. vet. J. 43, 129134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seddon, H. R. (1952). Diseases of domestic animals in Australia. Part 3. Tick and mite infestations.—Serv. Publ. Dep. Hlth. Aust. vet. Hyg. no. 7, 200 pp.Google Scholar
Seddon, H. R. (1952). Diseases of domestic animals in Australia. Part 4. Protozoan and viral diseases.—Serv. Publ. Dep. Hlth. Aust. vet. Hyg. no. 8, 214 pp.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, P. R. (1953). Observations on the sensory physiology and behaviour of larvae of the cattle tick, Boophilus microplus (Can.) (Ixodidae).—Aust. J. Zool. 1, 345356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, P. R. (1957). The spelling of pastures in cattle tick control.—Aust. J. Agric. Res. 8, 414423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, P. R. (1961). The use of sampling methods in studies of the distribution of larvae of Boophilus microplus on pasture.—Aust. J. Zool. 9, 752783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, P. R. & Wilson, J. T. (1959). Survival of cattle ticks in central Queensland pastures.—Aust. J. agric. Res. 10, 129143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zumpt, F. (1958). A preliminary survey of the distribution and host-specificity of ticks (Ixodoidea) in the Bechuanaland Protectorate.—Bull. ent. Res. 49, 201223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar