Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:56:35.723Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Multiple mating of Glossina morsitans Westw. and its potential effect on the sterile male technique

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

David A. Dame
Affiliation:
Entomology Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Salisbury, Rhodesia
Hugh R. Ford
Affiliation:
Entomology Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Salisbury, Rhodesia

Extract

Virgin females of Glossina morsitans Westw. derived from pupae collected on the field were exposed in the laboratory to virgin sterile males and later to virgin normal males; the resulting productivity was an indication of multiple mating by females. Females inseminated once with sterile sperm and then held for 0, 24 or 96 hr. before being allowed to mate with fertile males produced about equal numbers of progeny 29–56 days later; however, subequal numbers of progeny were produced the first 28 days after the initial mating because of the relationship between the time of the second insemination and ovulation. Females given the opportunity to mate repeatedly for 96 hours with their first mates also mated again with new groups of males, but the incidence of this second mating was lower. Thus, multiple mating of females in the laboratory is established, but its frequency in nature is unkown.

When groups of males were exposed to successive new groups of virgin females, the minimum mean number of females inseminated per male renged from 4.9 to 5.6. However, the later inseminations were progressively less effective, and once the complement of sperm of an individual male was depleted, fertility was not recovered. The multiple mating of male and female G. morsitans is not expected to affect the use of sterile males for population control.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Von Borstel, R. C. (1960). Population control by release of irradiated males.—Science 131 no. 3403 pp. 878, 880882.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dame, D. A. & Ford, H. R. (1966). Effect of the chemosterilant tepa on Glossina morsitans Westw.—Bull. ent. Res. 56 pp. 649658.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dame, D. A. & Schmidt, C. H. (1964). P32-labeled semen for mosquito mating studies.—J. econ. Ent. 57 pp. 669672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, A. M. (1958). The mating behaviour of females of Glossina palpalis (R.-D.) in captivity.—Bull. ent. Res. 49 pp. 3543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knipling, E. F. (1964). The potential role of the sterility method for insect population control with special reference to combining this method with conventional methods.—ARS-33–98, 54 pp. Washington, D.C., U.S. Dep. Agric.Google Scholar
Potts, W. H. (1958). Sterilization of tsetse-flies (Glossina) by gamma irradiation.—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 52 pp. 484499.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Southon, H. A. W. & Cockings, K. L. (1963). Fertilization of G. morsitans in the laboratory.—Rep. E. Afr. Trypanosomiasis Res. Org. 1962/1963, pp. 3337.Google Scholar
Steiner, L. F., Harris, E. J., Mitchell, W. C., Fujimoto, M. S. & Christenson, L. D. (1965). Melon fly eradication by overflooding with sterile flies.—J. econ Ent. 58 pp. 519522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanderplank, F. L. (1947). Experiments in the hybridisation of tsetse-flies (Glossina, Diptera) and the possibility of a new method of control.—Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 98 pp. 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar