Hostname: page-component-669899f699-rg895 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-30T00:21:35.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Moonlight and the biting activity of Culex (Melanoconion) portesi Senevet & Abonnenc and C. (M.) taeniopus D. & K. (Diptera, Culicidae) in Trinidad forests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

John B. Davies
John B. Davies
Affiliation:
External Scientific Staff, United Kingdom Medical Research Council, Trinidad Regional Virus Laboratory, University of the West Indies, P.O. Box 164, Port of Spain, Trinidad, West Indies
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The biting activity of Culex (Melanoconion) portesi Senevet & Abonnenc and C. (M.) taeniopus D. & K. in a secondary seasonal marsh forest in Trinidad was studied by means of catches by six mouse-baited suction traps, and a single light-trap. The traps were cleared at hourly intervals between 17.00 h and 07.00 h on nights which approximated to the new, first quarter, full and last quarter phases of the moon. The catches were compared with illumination at canopy and ground level which was estimated by selenium photocells whose output was recorded on the continuous chart of a servo-potentiometer. Humidity, rainfall, temperature and cloud cover were also recorded. In the suction traps both species showed peaks of activity at evening and dawn twilight at new moon, although the dawn peak was not very pronounced with C. taeniopus, but this pattern was modified on other nights in a manner which was consistent with moon age. At full moon the evening and dawn peaks were replaced by increased activity during moonrise and the middle of the night. The light-traps failed to show the evening and dawn activity and did not always duplicate the baited traps during darkness. Two hypotheses based on either a permissive range of illumination or an underlying circadian rhythm are discussed; neither fully explains the observed biting activity. Although an association between moonlight and biting activity does exist, an understanding of its nature will require more experimental data.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 65 , Issue 1 , March 1975 , pp. 81 - 96
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aitken, T. H. G., Spence, L., Jonkers, A. H. & Downs, W. G. (1969). A 10-year survey of Trinidadian Arthropods for natural virus infections (1953–1963).—J. Med. Entomol. 6, 207–215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aitken, T. H. G., Worth, C. B. & Tikasingh, E. S. (1968). Arbovirus studies in Bush Bush Forest, Trinidad, W.I., September 1959-December 1964. III. Entomological studies. —Am. J. trop. Med. Hyg. 17, 253–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aschoff, J. (1966). Circadian activity with two peaks.—Ecology 47, 657–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beard, J. S. (1946). The natural vegetation of Trinidad.—Oxf. For. Mem. no. 20, 152 pp.Google Scholar
Bidlingmayer, W. L. (1964). The effect of moonlight on the flight activity of mosquitoes.—Ecology 45, 87–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bidlingmayer, W. L. (1967). A comparison of trapping methods for adult mosquitoes: species response and environmental influence.—J. Med. Entomol. 4, 200–220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowden, J. (1973 a). The significance of moonlight in photoperiodic responses of insects.—Bull. ent. Res. 62, 605–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowden, J. (1973 b). The influence of moonlight on catches of insects in light-traps in Africa. Part I. The moon and moonlight.—Bull. ent. Res. 63, 113–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callahan, P. S. (1964). An inexpensive actinometer for continuous field recording of moonlight, daylight or low-intensity evening light.—J. econ. Ent. 57, 758–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbet, P. S. (1964). Nocturnal flight activity of sylvan Culicidae and Tabanidae (Diptera) as indicated by light-traps: a further study.—Proc. R. ent. soc. Lond. (A) 39, 53–67.Google Scholar
Davies, J. B. (1969). Field preservation and storage of mosquitoes for laboratory studies.—Mosquito News 29, 259.Google Scholar
Davies, J. B. (1973). A simple battery operated suction trap for insects attracted to animal, light or chemical bait.—Mosquito News 33, 102–104.Google Scholar
de Kruijf, H. A. M. (1970). Aspects of the ecology of mosquitoes in relation to the transmission of arboviruses in Surinam.—100 pp. Thesis, University of Lyden Faculty of Medicine.Google Scholar
Detinova, T. S. (1962). Age-grouping methods in Diptera of medical importance with special reference to some vectors of malaria.—Monograph Ser. W.H.O. no. 47, 216 pp.Google ScholarPubMed
Haddow, A. J. (1960). Studies on the biting habits and medical importance of East African mosquitoes in the genus Aedes. I.—Subgenera Aedomorphus, Banksinella and Dunnius.—Bull. ent. Res. 50, 759–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, M. D. R. (1973). Delayed effect of light on the mosquito ‘clock’.—Nature, Lond. 245, 384–385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, M. D. R., Hill, M. & Hope, A. M. (1967). The circadian flight activity of the mosquito Anopheles gambiae: phase setting by the light regime.—J. exp. Biol. 47, 503–511.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lumsden, W. H. R. (1966). Light, forest insects, arboviruses and trypanosomes. In Bainbridge, R., Evans, G. C. & Rackham, O. (Eds) Light as an ecological factor.—Symp. Br. Ecol. Soc. no. 6, 209–233.Google Scholar
Miller, T. A., Stryker, R. G., Wilkinson, R. N. & Esah, S. (1970). The influence of moonlight and other environmental factors on the abundance of certain mosquito species in light-trap collections in Thailand.—J. med. Entomol. 7, 555–561.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Minnaert, M. (1954). The nature of light and colour in the open air.—362 pp. New York, Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Nayar, J. K. & Sauerman, D. M. Jr (1971). The effect of light regimes on the circadian rhythm of flight activity in the mosquito Aedes taeniorhynchus.—J. exp. Biol. 54, 745–756.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Provost, M. W. (1958). Mating and male swarming in Psorophora mosquitoes.—Int. Congr. Ent. X, 2, 553–561.Google Scholar
Provost, M. W. (1959). The influence of moonlight on light-trap catches of mosquitoes.—Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 52, 261–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribbands, C. R. (1946). Moonlight and house-haunting habits of female Anophelines in West Africa.—Bull. ent. Res. 36, 395–417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Srihongse, S. & Galindo, P. (1967). The isolation of eastern equine encephalitis virus from Culex (Melanoconion) taeniopus Dyar and Knab in Panama.—Mosquito News 27, 74–76.Google Scholar
Sudia, W. D. & Chamberlin, R. W. (1962). Battery-operated light trap, an improved model. Mosquito News 22, 126–129.Google Scholar
Szeicz, G. (1968). Measurement of radiant energy. In Wadsworth, R. M.(Ed.) The measurement of environmental factors in terrestrial ecology.—Symp. Br. Ecol. Soc. no. 8, 109–130.Google Scholar
Tikasingh, E. S. (1973). Rainfall-temperature-humidity relationships in Bush Bush Forest, Trinidad.—J. Trin. Fld Nat. Club 1973, 7–12.Google Scholar
Tikasingh, E. S. & Davies, J. B. (1972). Comparative tests of four mosquito traps.—Mosquito News. 32, 623–627.Google Scholar
Wang, H. & Chang, C. (1957). The outdoor nocturnal biting activity of Anopheles hyrcanus var. sinensis in relation to the factors of temperature, humidity, light and rain.—Acta ent. sin. 7, 473–480.Google Scholar
Whitmore, T. C. (1966). A study of light conditions in forests in Ecuador with some suggestions for further studies in tropical forests. In Bainbridge, R., Evans, G. C. & Rackham, O. (Eds) Light as an ecological factor.—Symp. Br. Ecol. Soc. no. 6, 235–247.Google Scholar
Williams, C. B., Singh, B. P. & El-Ziaidy, S. (1956). An investigation into the possible effects of moonlight on the activity of insects in the field.—Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (A) 31, 135–144.Google Scholar
Worth, C. B. & Jonkers, A. H. (1962). Two traps for mosquitoes attracted to small vertebrate animals.—Mosquito News 22, 18–21.Google Scholar