Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T00:16:30.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The management of acaricide resistance in the cattle tick, Boophilus microplus (Canestrini) (Acari: Ixodidae), in Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

R. W. Sutherst  and
H. N. Comins
R. W. Sutherst
Affiliation:
CS1RO Division of Entomology, Private Bag 3, Indooroopilly, Queensland 4068, Australia.
H. N. Comins
Affiliation:
Environmental Management Unit, Department of Zoology and Applied Entomology, Imperial College, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An analysis, using mathematical models, is presented of the ecological, genetic and economic factors that determine the optimal strategies for the long-term use of chemical control of Boophilus microplus (Can.) on cattle. As an illustration, the control of the tick in south-eastern Queensland is considered, but the approach is readily applicable in any other geographical area. It is suggested that optimal strategies take into account the need to delay the development of resistance to acaricides. The suggested strategies involve the use of tick-resistant Zebu-type cattle as a basis for tick control. High concentrations of acaricides are recommended to reduce seleotion of resistant ticks. Careful timing and moderation in the use of acaricides is also recommended to minimise the number of occasions on which resistant ticks are subjected to selection at times when they can successfully reproduce. As the spread of resistance is thought to occur primarily on moving cattle and before resistance is evident, stringent quarantine measures may slow down the spread.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 69 , Issue 3 , September 1979 , pp. 519 - 537
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon. (1975). Cattle tick in Australia. Inquiry by the Cattle Tick Control Commission, Report, November 1973.—108 pp. Canberra, Australian Government Publishing Service.Google Scholar
Brown, A. W. A. (1974). Development of resistance to insecticides, pp. 73–81 in Proceedings of the F.A.O. Conference on Ecology in relation to Plant Pest Control, Rome, 11–15 December, 1972. 326 pp. [AGP: 1973/M/14].Google Scholar
Comins, H. N. (1977). The management of pesticide resistance. — J. theor. Biol. 65, 399–420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Comins, H. N. (1979). Analytic methods for the management of pesticide resistance. — J. theor. Biol. 77, 171–188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crow, J. F. (1957). Genetics of insect resistance to chemicals. — A. Rev. Ent. 2, 227–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crow, J. F.. & Kimura, M. (1970). An introduction to population genetics theory.—591 pp. New York, Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. (1930). The genetical theory of natural selection. — 272 pp. Oxford, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georghiou, G. P. (1971). Resistance of insects and mites to insecticides and acaricides and the future of pesticide chemicals, pp. 112–124in Swift, J. E. (Ed.). Agricultural chemicals—harmonyordiscordforfood, peopleandtheenvironment. — 151 pp. Berkeley, University of California.Google Scholar
Georghiou, G. P.. & Taylor, C. E. (1977). Operational influences in the evolution of insecticide resistance. — J. econ. Ent. 70, 653–658.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harley, K. L. S.. &Wilkinson, P. R. (1964). A comparison of cattle tick control by [conventional] acarioidal treatment, planned dipping and pasture spelling. — Aust.J. agric. Res. 15, 841–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huete, D.. & Regev, U. (1974). Optimal agricultural pest management with increasing pest resistance. — Am. J. agric. Econ. 56, 543–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keiding, J. (1974). The development of resistance to pyrethroids in field populations of Danish houseflies. — Abstr. 3rd Int. Congr. Pestic. Chem., Helsinki,1974, abstract no. 361.Google Scholar
Li, C. C. (1968). Population genetics. — 366 pp. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
May, R. M., Conway, G. R., Hassell, M. P.. & Southwood, T. R. E. (1974). Time delays, density-dependence and single species oscillations. — J. Anim. Ecol. 43, 747–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, K. R. (1957). Strategic dipping for control of the cattle tick, Boophilus microplus (Canestrini), in South Queensland. — Aust. J. agric. Res. 8, 768–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roulston, W. J., Wharton, R. H., Schnitzerling, H. J., Sutherst, R. W. & Sullivan, N. D. (1971). Mixtures of chlorphenamidine with other acaricides for the control of organophosphorus-resistant strains of cattle tick Boophilus microplus. — Aust. vet. J. 47, 521–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seifert, G. W. (1971). Ecto- and endoparasdtic effects on the growth rates of Zebu crossbred and British cattle in the field. — Aust. J. agric. Res. 22, 839–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, B. F. (1962 a). The inheritance of DDT-resistance in the cattle tick, Boophilus microplus. — Aust. J. agric. Res. 13, 984–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, B. F. (1962 b). The inheritance of dieldrin-resistance in the cattle tick, Boophilus microplus. — Aust. J. agric. Res. 13, 1008–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, B. F. (1968). Inheritance of resistance to organophosphorus caricides in the cattle tick, Boophilus microplus. — Aust. J. biol. Sci. 21, 309–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, B. F. (1972). The genetics of resistance by ticks to acaricides. — Aust. vet. J. 48, 345–350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stone, B. F., Wilson, J. T.. & Youlton, N. J. (1973). Inheritance of dimethoate resistance in the Mackay strain of the cattle tick (Boophilus microplus) in Australia. — Aust. J.biol. Sci. 26, 445–451.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stone, B. F., Wilson, J. T.. & Youlton, N. J. (1976). Linkage and dominance characteristics of genes for resistance to organophosphorus acaricides and allelic inheritance of decreased brain cholinesterase activity in three strains of the cattle tick, Boophilus microplus. — Aust. J. biol. Sci. 29, 251–263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sutherst, R. W., Norton, G. A., Conway, G. R., Birley, M. H.. & Comins, H. N. (in press). Analysis of management strategies for the cattle tick (Boophilus microplus) in Australia. — J. appl. Ecol.Google Scholar
Sutherst, R. W.. & Utech, K. B. W. (in press). Controlling livestock parasites with host animal resistance, in Pimental, D. (Ed.). Handbook of Agriculture. Pest Control. — CRC Press, Florida.Google Scholar
Sutherst, R. W., Utech, K. B. W., Dallwitz, M. J.. & Kerr, J. D. (1973). Intra-specific competition of Boophilus microplus (Canestrini) on cattle. — J. appl. Ecol. 10, 855–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutherst, R. W., Utech, K. B. W., Kerr, J. D. & Wharton, R. H. (in press). Density-dependent mortality of the tick Boophilus microplus on cattle—further observations. — J. appl. Ecol..Google Scholar
Wharton, R. H.. Harley, K. L. S.. Wilkinson, P. R.. Utech, K. B. W.. &Kelley, B. M. (1969). A comparison of cattle tick control by pasture spelling, planned dipping and tick resistant cattle. — Aust. J. agric. Res.. 20, 783–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wharton, R. H.. & Roulston, W. J. (1970). Resistance of ticks to chemicals. — A. Rev. Ent. 15, 381–404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilkinson, P. R. (1957). The spelling of pasture in cattle tick control. — Aust. J. agric. Res. 8, 414–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J. T., Stone, B. F. & Wharton, R. H. (1971). Inheritance of diazinon resistance in the Biarra strain of the cattle tick (Boophilus microplus) in Australia. — Aust. J. agric. Res. 22, 169–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar