Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:12:41.393Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Male wing fanning by the aphid parasitoid Aphidius ervi (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) produces a courtship song

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2011

C.A. Villagra ,
C.F. Pinto ,
M. Penna  and
H.M. Niemeyer
C.A. Villagra*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ciencias Ecológicas, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Casilla 653, Santiago, Chile
C.F. Pinto
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ciencias Ecológicas, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Casilla 653, Santiago, Chile
M. Penna
Affiliation:
Programa de Fisiología y Biofísica, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile
H.M. Niemeyer*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ciencias Ecológicas, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Casilla 653, Santiago, Chile
*
*Authors for correspondence Fax: 562 9787445 E-mail: [email protected], [email protected]
*Authors for correspondence Fax: 562 9787445 E-mail: [email protected], [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We, herein, report evidence that wing fanning by the aphid parasitoid Aphidius ervi Haliday (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) constitutes a courtship song. Complete removal of the forewings or only the distal half of them reduced male copulation success in comparison to intact males. Males that achieved copulation within the observation period produced wing fanning at a higher rate than males that did not copulate. Playback of wing fanning sound altered the behaviour of virgin females, increasing the time they devoted to grooming, as compared with subjects that were exposed to silence or white noise. Our findings contribute to the understanding of the acoustic dimension of the sensory modalities employed by this aphid parasitoid in sexual signalling.

Keywords

wing fanningcourtship songaphid parasitoidcopulation behaviour
Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 101 , Issue 5 , October 2011 , pp. 573 - 579
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ayasse, M., Paxton, R.J. & Tengö, J. (2001) Mating behaviour and chemical communication in the order hymenoptera. Annual Review of Entomology 46, 31–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bailey, W.J. (1991) Acoustic Behavior of Insects. London and New York, Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Battaglia, D., Isidoro, N., Romani, R., Bin, F. & Pennacchio, F. (2002) Mating behaviour of Aphidius ervi (Hymenoptera: Braconidae): the role of antennae. European Journal of Entomology 99, 451–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennet-Clark, H.C. (1971) Acoustics of insect song. Nature 234, 255–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennet-Clark, H.C. (1998) Size and scale effects as constraints in insect sound communication. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London 353, 407–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumstein, D.T., Evans, C.S. & Daniel, J.C. (2000) JWatcher 0.9. An introductory user´s guide. Animal Behaviour Laboratory, Macquarie University, Australia: Available online at http://galliform.psy.mq.edu.au/jwatcher/ (accessed 26 march 2011).Google Scholar
Casas, J. & Magal, C. (2006) Mutual eavesdropping through vibration in a host-parasitoid interaction: from plant biomechanics to behavioral ecology. pp. 263–274in Drosopoulos, S.A. & Claridge, M.F. (Eds) Insect Sounds and Communication: Physiology, Behaviour, Ecology and Evolution. Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press.Google Scholar
Chittka, L. & Thompson, J.D. (2001) Cognitive Ecology of Pollination. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Čokl, A. & Virant-Doberlet, M. (2003) Communication with substrate-borne signals in small plant-dwelling insects. Annual Review of Entomology 48, 29–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crossley, S.A., Bennet-Clark, H.C. & Evert, H.T. (1995) Courtship song components affect male and female Drosophila differently. Animal Behavior 50, 827–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danci, A.T., Takács, S., Schaefer, P.W. & Gries, G. (2010) Evidence for acoustic communication in the parasitoid wasp Glyptapanteles flavicoxis. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 136, 142–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreller, C. & Kirchner, W.H. (1993) Hearing in honeybees: localization of the auditory sense organ. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 173, 275–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drosopoulos, S.A. & Claridge, M.F. (Eds) (2006) Insect Sounds and Communication: Physiology, Behaviour, Ecology and Evolution. Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press.Google Scholar
Eberl, D.F., Duyk, G.M. & Perrimon, N. (1997) A genetic screen for mutations that disrupt an auditory response in Drosophila melanogaster. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 94, 14837–14842.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ewing, A.W. & Bennet-Clark, H.C. (1968) The courtship songs of Drosophila. Behaviour 31, 288–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farish, D.J. (1972) The evolutionary implications of qualitative variation in the grooming behaviour of the Hymenoptera (Insecta). Animal Behavior 20, 662–676.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frings, H. & Frings, M. (1958) Uses of sounds by insects. Annual Review of Entomology 3, 87–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glinwood, R.T., Du, Y.J. & Powell, W. (1999) Responses to aphid sex pheromones by the pea aphid parasitoids Aphidius ervi and Aphidius eadyi. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 92, 227–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenfield, M.D. (2002) Signalers and Receivers: Mechanisms and Evolution of Arthropod Communication. New York, USA, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoikkala, A., Kaneshiro, K.Y. & Hoy, R.R. (1994) Courtship songs of the picture-winged Drosophila planitibia subgroup species. Animal Behaviour 47, 1363–1374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, R.W. & Blomquist, G.J. (1982) Chemical ecology and biochemistry of insect hydrocarbons. Annual Review of Entomology 27, 149–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarman, A.P. (2002) Studies of mechanosensation using the fly. Human Molecular Genetics 11, 1215–1218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnston, C. (1855) Auditory apparatus of the Culex mosquito. Quarterly Journal of Microscopy Science 3, 97–102.Google Scholar
Joyce, A.L., Hunt, R.E., Bernal, J.S. & Vinson, S.B. (2008) Substrate influences mating success and transmission of courtship vibrations for the parasitoid Cotesia marginiventris. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 127, 39–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackauer, M. (1969) Sexual behaviour of and hybridization between three species of Aphidius Nees parasitic on the pea aphid. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 71, 339–351.Google Scholar
Marchand, D. & McNeil, J.N. (2000) Effects of wind speed and atmospheric pressure on mate searching behaviour in the aphid parasitoid Aphidius nigripes (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae). Journal of Insect Behavior 13, 187–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markl, H. (1983) Vibrational communication. pp. 332–353in Huber, F. & Markl, H. (Eds) Neuroethology and Behavioral Physiology. Berlin, Germany, Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClure, M., Wisthlecraft, J. & McNeil, J.N. (2007) Courtship behaviour in relation to the female sex pheromone in the parasitoid, Aphidius ervi (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology 33, 1946–1959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeil, J.N. & Brodeur, J. (1995) Pheromone mediated mating in the aphid parasitoid Aphidius nigripes (Hymenoptera: Aphididae). Journal of Chemical Ecology 21, 959–972.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, M.C. & Tsao, C.H. (1974) Significance of wing vibration in male Nasonia vitripennis (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) during courtship. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 67, 772–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quicke, D.L.J. (1997) Parasitic Wasps. London, UK, Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Ritchie, M.G., Halsey, E.J. & Gleason, J.M. (1999) Drosophila song as a species-specific mating signal and the behavioural importance of Kyriacou & Hall cycles in D. melanogaster song. Animal Behaviour 58, 649–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rybak, F., Aubin, T., Moulin, B. & Jallon, J.M. (2002) Acoustic communication in Drosophila melanogaster court ship: Are pulse -and sine- song frequencies important for courtship success? Canadian Journal of Zoology 80, 987–996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sivinski, J. (1988) What do fruit fly songs mean? Florida Entomologist 71, 462–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sivinski, J. & Webb, J.C. (1989) Acoustic signals produced during courtship in Diachasmimorpha (=Biosteres) longicaudata (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) and other Braconidae. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 82, 116–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skals, N., Anderson, P., Kanneworff, M., Löfstedt, C. & Surlykke, A. (2005) Her odours make him deaf: crossmodal modulation of olfaction and hearing in a male moth. Journal of Experimental Biology 208, 595–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swedenborg, P.D., Jones, R.L., Liu, H.W. & Krick, T.P. (1993) (3R*, 5S*, 6R*)-3,5-Dimethyl-6- (methylethyl)-3,4,5,6-tetrahydropyran-2-one, a 3rd sex pheromone component for Macrocentrus grandii (Goidanich) (Hymenoptera-Braconidae) and evidence for its utility at eclosion. Journal of Chemical Ecology 19, 485–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Syvertsen, T.C., Jackson, L.L., Blomquist, G.J. & Vinson, S.B. (1995) Alkadienes mediating courtship in the parasitoid Cardiochiles nigriceps (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology 21, 1971–1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van den Assem, J. & Putters, F.A. (1980) Patterns of sound produced by courting chalcidoid males and its biological significance. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 27, 293–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villagra, C.A., Vásquez, R.A. & Niemeyer, H.M. (2005) Associative odour learning affects mating behaviour in Aphidius ervi males. European Journal of Entomology 102, 557–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Schilcher, F. (1976a) The role of auditory stimuli in the courtship of Drosophila melanogaster. Animal Behaviour 24, 18–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Schilcher, F. (1976b) The function of pulse song and sine song in the courtship of Drosophila melanogaster. Animal Behaviour 24, 622–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, B., Gibson, G. & Russell, I.J. (2009) Sex recognition through mid-flight mating duets in Culex mosquitoes is mediated by acoustic distortion. Current Biology 19, 485–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yager, D.D. (1999) Structure, development and evolution of insect auditory systems. Microscope Research and Technique 47, 380–400.3.0.CO;2-P>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zefa, E. de P., Martins, L. & Szinwelski, N. (2008) Complex mating behavior in Adelosgryllus rubricephalus (Orthoptera, Phalangopsidae, Grylloidea). Iheringia, Série Zoologique 98, 325–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar