Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:15:55.284Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Life-history and Growth of the Cockroach Blatta orientalis, Linn.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

M. A. H. Qadri
M. A. H. Qadri
Affiliation:
(From the Dept. of Entomology, Zoological Laboratory, Cambridge.)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The life-history of Blatta orientalis has been studied from the time of the deposition of the ootheca by the female till the nymphs of the third generation emerge, viz., through two embryonic and one post-embryonic lives.

The cockroach passes through one pronymphal and six nymphal stages and moults seven times after its exit from the ootheca.

The post-embryonic growth, including the increase of the antennal and cercal joints, and the modification of the external genitalia, is described. It has been shown that nymphs of various instars and their sexes can be distinguished, especially with the help of the genitalia, the number of cercal joints, and the growth of the wing-rudiments.

The average time taken by 27 nymphs to mature at 27·5C. is 279 days. The males mature earlier than the females and also die before the latter.

The formation and structure of the spermatophore are described and also the exact mode of copulation, including the use of various parts of the male genitalia.

The ootheca is deposited with special care by the female in that she digs a pit with the help of her mandibles and the fore legs and covers the ootheca afterwards. The nymphs emerge without the help of the female and the latter does not take any care of the ootheca after it has been safely deposited.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 29 , Issue 3 , October 1938 , pp. 263 - 276
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1938

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adair, E. W. (1923). Notes sur Periplaneta americana L. et Blatta orientalis L. (Orthop.).—Bull. Soc. Roy. Ent. d'Egypte, 6, pp. 18–38.Google Scholar
Beier, M. (1933). Biology of German Blattidae.—Biol. Tier. Dtschl., 26, pp. 1–116.Google Scholar
Brindley, H. H. (1897). On the regeneration of the legs in Blattidae.—Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 60, pp. 903–916.Google Scholar
Bugnion, E. (1921). The growth of the antennae and cerci of the cockroach Periplaneta americana L.—Bull. Soc. Entom. Egypte, 5, pp. 56–66.Google Scholar
Bugnion, E. (1921 a). The growth of the antenna of Empusa egena Charp. (Orthoptera).—Bull. Soc. Entom. Egypte, 6, pp. 118–132.Google Scholar
Du Porte, E. M. (1920). The muscular system of Gryllus assimilis Fab.—Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer., 13, pp. 16–52.Google Scholar
Fisher, O. (1927). Die Entwicklung im Periplaneta americana.—Mitt. d. Naturfor. Gesellsch. Sitzb., 5.Google Scholar
Fuller, C. (1920). On the post-embryonic development of the antennae of termites.—Ann. Natal Govt. Mus., 4, pp. 235–295.Google Scholar
Gunn, D. L. & Notely, F. B. (1936). The temperature and humidity relations of the cockroach, Blatta orientalis.—J. Exp. Biol., 13, pp. 28–34.Google Scholar
Haber, V. R. (1920). Oviposition by the cockroach Periplaneta americana L.—Ent. News, 31, pp. 190–193.Google Scholar
Hall, W. J. (1899). On the structure and life-history of the cockroach Periplaneta orientalis.—Trans. Leicester Lit. & Phil. Soc., 5, pp. 123–133.Google Scholar
Harrison, R. M. (1906). Preliminary account of a new organ in Periplaneta orientalis.—Quart. J. Micro. Sci. 50, pp. 377–382.Google Scholar
Henneguy, F. (1904). Les Insectes. Paris.Google Scholar
Illingworth, G. F. (1918). Notes on the mating of cockroaches.—Proc. Hawai. Ent. Soc., 3, pp. 374–375.Google Scholar
Imms, A. D. (1934). A General Text-book of Entomology. London.Google Scholar
Lucas, W. J. (1920). British Orthoptera. London.Google Scholar
Mellanby, R. M. & Maynard, L. A. (1937). Nutrition studies with the cockroach (Blattella germanica).—Physiol. Zool., 10, pp. 36–44.Google Scholar
Miall, & Denny, . (1886). The Cockroach. London.Google Scholar
Minchin, E. A. (1889). On a new organ and on the structure of the hypodermis in Periplaneta orientalis.—Quart. J. Micro. Sci. 29, pp. 229–233.Google Scholar
Oettinger, R. (1915). Uber die Drüsentaschen am Abdomen von Periplaneta orientalis und Phyllodromia germanica.—Zool. Anz., 30, pp. 338–349.Google Scholar
Rau, P. (1924). The biology of the roach (Blatta orientalis L.).—Trans. Acad. Sci. St. Louis, 25, pp. 57–79.Google Scholar
Roberts, R. A. (1937). Biology of the Bordered Mantid, Stagmomantis limbata Hahn (Orthoptera, Mantidae).—Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer., 30, pp. 96–110.Google Scholar
Roberts, R. A. (1937 a). Biology of the Minor Mantid, Litaneutria minor Scudder (Orthoptera, Mantidae).—Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer., 30, pp. 111–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, H. H. (1929). Trans. Illinois Acad. Sci., 21.Google Scholar
Scott, H. (1929). On some cases of maternal care displayed by the cockroaches and their significance.—Ent. Mon. Mag., 66, pp. 218–222.Google Scholar
Sikora, H. (1918). Zur Bedeutung der Ruckendrüse des Männchen bei der Kuchenschabe (Phyllodromia germanica).—Zeits. angew. Ent., 4, pp. 374–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snodgrass, R. E. (1937). The male genitalia of Orthopteroid Insects.—Smithsonian Misc. Coll., 96, (5).Google Scholar
Uvarov, B. P. (1928). Locusts and Grasshoppers. London.Google Scholar
Willie, J. (1920). Biologie und Bekämpfung der deutschen Schabe (Phyllodromia germanica L.).—Monogr. Zeits. angew. Entom., 5, 140 pp.Google Scholar
Williams, C. B. & Buxton, P. A. (1916). On the biology of Sphodromantis guttata.—Trans. Ent. Soc. London, pp. 86–100.Google Scholar
Zabinski, J. (1929). The growth of blackbeetles and of cockroaches on artificial and incomplete diets. Part I.—J. Exp. Biol., 6, pp. 360–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zabinski, J. (1933). Copulation extérieure chez les blattes.—C. R. Soc. Biol., 112, pp. 596–598.Google Scholar
Zabinski, J. (1933 a). Fonctionment des differentes parties des appareils copulateurs chitines màles et femelles de la blatte (Periplaneta orientalis L.).—C. R. Soc. Biol. pp. 598–602.Google Scholar